“Do you understand, gentlemen,
that the horror is just this -- that there is no horror?”
-- Alexandre Kuprin
A New “First” For Bush
Sometimes you've got to wonder if newspaper managers are deliberately trying
to numb readers with Orwellian madness.
Look, for example, at the top page of last Tuesday's USA Today,
the "national newspaper" that has done so much to blur the line between
print journalism and bad television. On the rightmost column of that page
you can read about "a first" for the Bush administration. During a recent
speech in Philadelphia, the paper reports, Bush acknowledged that a specific
and specific number -- "about 30,000" in the president's words -- of Iraqi
deaths have resulted from his imperial invasion and occupation (Coren Dorell,
"Bush Puts Deaths of Iraqis at 30,000," USA Today, 13 December,
The White House "offered no details," USA Today observed, "about how
the 30,000 died, or who killed them."
"Bush's number," USA Today reporter Coren Dorell notes, "roughly
matches an estimate by Iraq Body Count, a research group that uses
media accounts to measure civilian deaths. On Monday, that count numbered
between 27,383 and 30,892. That is far lower," Dorell acknowledged, "than
the count in a 2004 study published in the medical journal The Lancet,
which used a survey of Iraqi households to estimate that about 100,000
Iraqis had died."
On "How The 30,000 Died and Who Killed Them"
USA Today neglected to mention it, but Bush and the rest of us can
easily learn a great deal about "how the 30,000 died and who killed them."
Iraq Body Count (IBC)'s recently published "Dossier
of Civilian Casualties in Iraq, 2003-2005"
reports that 1 in every 1,000 Iraqis was violently killed between March 20,
2003 (the day after the beginning of the U.S. invasion) and March 19, 2005.
Of the 13,181 victims of violent death for which IBC has age and
gender data, 10 percent were infants or children, 9 percent were adult
females, and 82 percent were adult males.
By projecting from readily available data on Iraqi marriage and childbirth
rates, IBC infers that "tens of thousands of Iraqi women and children
have lost a husband or father to violence since March 2003, a loss which
will have long lasting psychological and economic consequences for the
Iraqi families are also dealing with crippling injuries resulting
from wartime violence. By IBC's careful tabulation, 42,500 Iraqis
have been wounded during the occupation.
Who has done the killing and wounding? By IBC's meticulous
account, based on multiple verifiable media reports, anti-occupation forces
have killed less than 10 percent of the total number of the nearly
25,000 dead for whom the killers can be identified. "Criminal elements,"
who have thrived in the lawless environment created by the destruction
of Iraqi civil authority, killed 8,935 or 36 percent.
The biggest killers have been the U.S.-led armed forces, which
violently ended the lives of 9,270 Iraqis or 37.3 percent.
"Under Fire by U.S. Snipers"
In separate databases that include real-time accounts from reporters
in Iraq, IBC presents a number of accounts of Iraqis killed by
American "liberators." IBC's "Falluja Archive" contains (to give one
among many examples) an April 2004 Associated Press (AP) story relating how
more than 600 Iraqis, "mostly women, children, and the elderly," were
butchered during Uncle Sam's massive "retaliatory" (after the resistance
killed U.S.-funded Blackwell Security mercenaries) campaign in Falluja.
"Iraqis in Falluja," the AP noted, "complained that civilians were coming
under fire by U.S. snipers."
One such civilian was mentioned in an especially chilling account quoted in
the Falluja Archive. "One of the bodies brought to the clinic," wrote
Nation correspondent Dahr Jamail in The Nation, "was that of a 55-year old
man shot in the back by a [U.S.] sniper outside his home, while his wife and
children huddled wailing inside. The family could not retrieve his body for
fear of being shot themselves. His stiff corpse was carried into the clinic,
flies swarming above it. One of his arms was half raised by rigor mortis."
"If We Don't Care For Our Families, Soldiers are Not Going to Stay"
Yet even with USA Today's repetition of Bush's refusal to comment on
"how the 30,000 died and who killed them," I still found it jarring to move
from the story on Bush's acknowledgement of mass Iraqi death to the other
main item on page one of the paper's Tuesday edition.
This second story is titled "War's Trauma Wears on the Children Left
Behind." It highlights a major Pentagon program to soothe the anxieties of
the children of the people sent to "liberate" "about 30,000" Iraqis from the
burden of living.
Young schoolchildren on and around major U.S. military bases, USA Today reports,
are being treated to a Pentagon-sponsored puppet show called "Nothing to
Worry About." In one "Nothing to Worry About" show, "Mr. Grumpy" tells
assembled young children: "Maybe this will get you worried! Maybe your dad's
[military] company will get attacked like we see on the news."
At this point, a soothing maternal figure steps in to say, "OK, Mr. Grumpy,
you know what? If that happens they have big airplanes and big helicopters
and a lot of soldiers who are extremely well trained. They know exactly what
"Nothing to Worry About" is just one part of what USA Today reporter
Gregg Zorroya calls "a sweeping Pentagon effort to emotionally safeguard
children when parents are at war."
According to Zorroya, "an estimated 1.9 million kids have a mom or dad in
uniform, and since 2001, a third of all U.S. forces have served or are
serving in [the official ‘war zones’ of] Iraq or Afghanistan."
So far, Zorroya reports, one thousand and thirty six (1,036)
American children have lost parent-soldiers to the "war in Iraq."
Due to real and feared parent death and maiming in George "Bring 'em
On" Bush's illegal occupation of Iraq, military children across the
imperial "homeland" are experiencing chronic anxiety, loneliness, fear, and
In one elementary school adjacent to North Carolina's Fort Bragg, Zorroya
reports, "kindergarteners barely able to write their names have lined up to
fill out slips for counseling. As they did last year, guidance counselors
will soon form group sessions with children around a small table; on the
walls, the counselors will hang a National Geographic map with
construction-paper hearts framing two countries: Iraq and Afghanistan."
The survivors of Iraq's "about 30,000" war dead would be touched, doubt, to
learn that counselors of the children of some of their loved one's immediate
executioners have lovingly circled occupied Iraq in a paper heart.
According to USA Today, these and other such military
child-"safeguarding" efforts are "unprecedented" in "number and scope,"
revealing "a new willingness of the military to promote counseling and
family assistance, especially as the war in Iraq approaches its fourth
year." By helping out families on the emotional "home front," the Pentagon
hopes "to encourage soldiers to re-enlist."
Here Zorroya gives an especially touching quote from Lt. Col. Mary
Dooley-Bernhard, who manages the U.S. Army's Family Advocacy Program. "We
realize that if we don't care for our families," Dooley-Bernhard told USA
Today, "soldiers are not going to stay."
Yes, it's getting harder and harder to send America's beleaguered
working-class troops back for third and fourth tours in the vicious, deadly,
and brazenly imperialist war of occupation that has been ordered by George
In a particularly moving expression of its deep commitment to families and
children, the U.S. military will soon release an activity book giving "tips
to [military] children living with a parent who's an amputee."
There are a few things missing from USA Today's second article. The
most relevant deletions include any sense of the spectacularly immoral,
illegal, and unnecessary nature of the war that is causing so much pain for
American military children and families.
Another thing missing is any sense of concern for Iraqi children, who are
being victimized by this imperialist war in larger numbers and to a greater
degree. Iraqi children need even more emotional safeguarding, living as they
do in a nation with so little basic protection from massive imperial
Equally absent is any sense of connection between children's pain at home
and abroad -- this even as a directly adjacent story tells us that even the
president has been compelled to acknowledge higher Iraqi casualties.
How are the children of U.S.-butchered Iraqis supposed to feel about
the Pentagon's effort to sustain the American imperial-familial "home
front's" ability to support Bush's murderous assault on Mesopotamia? Will
military child counselors keep putting paper hearts around Iraq as U.S
troops are increasingly replaced by deadly and indiscriminate bombs as the
primary enforcers of imperial rule?
Another thing missing is any sense of a key issue that many U.S. military
children are already dealing with: the deep emotional scars carried by
fathers and mothers who have acted on orders to murder, maim, and torture
Iraqi civilians. Is the military working up an activity book to give
children tips on how to live with a parent who has been emotionally
shattered by his or her role in the killing of innocent Iraqis?
The main thing missing, it
seems to me, is any appropriate sense of horror at the viciously circular
militarist madness of Bush's miserable, messianic war of aggression.
But then, last Tuesday's USA Today is just another example of
dominant ("mainstream") media's mandatory inability to acknowledge the
awful criminality of U.S. foreign policy. Dedicated at heart to making
authoritarian evil seem normal and even banal, that corporate war media
perfectly expresses the timeless moral idiocy that led Alexandre Kuprin to
write his famous line.
is a Visiting Professor of American History at Northern Illinois
University. His latest book is
Empire and Inequality: America and the World Since 9/11 (Boulder,
CO: Paradigm Publishers, October 2004). He
can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Other Recent Articles by Paul Street
Militarism Versus Democracy in Imperial America
"Cowardice" Card: Militarism's Last and Self-Fulfilling Refuge
Clinton Was No Champion of the Poor
Media and Damage Control in the Wake of a Not-So Natural Disaster
All-Too American Tragedy of New Orleans: Empire, Inequality, Race and Oil
Separate, Unequal: Race, Place, Policy & Racism Avoidance in and Around
China, Two Deficits, and the Ongoing Decline of US Hegemony
Was a Minor Crime
* The Nuclear
Option” and the One Party State
Schiavo, 84,000 Black Men, and Dominant Media's Selective Morality
* “Because We
Luther King. Jr. and “The Triple Evils That Are Interrelated”
Motivates Us to Kill the Enemy
to Troops in Iraq: “Fight Naked...Life’s a Bitch and Then YOU Die”
Apology for Dissent: Truth and Cowardice
Love, Hates, Kills, Dies
on Tape and the Broader War Criminality
United States: “As Menacing to Itself and the World As Ever”
* The Fabric
of Deception and Liberal Complicity
Reflections: Resentment Abhors a Vaccum
* The 9/11
Commission Report: Bush's Negligence Didn't Happen
* Notes on
Race, Gender, and Mass Infantilization
Descending Spiral Ending in Destruction for All-Too Many”
Democratic Empire and Atrocity Denial
Predictable Failure to Make Bush Pay for Rising US Poverty
Control, Costas, the Olympics and Imperial Occupations Past and Present
* JF Kerry:
“I am Not a [Redistribution] Democrat”
White Men and Why Segregation Matters
"Vile Maxim" Versus the Common Good: Different Approaches to November
* We Need
a New Media Relationship
States” at Home and Abroad
* Be “Part
of Something”: Sign Up With The American Empire Project
Congratulations, Mr. Bush: You Have Not Presided Over the Final Collapse
Had Jobs Too"
v. Board Fifty Years Out: Still Separate and Unequal
* Let Them
England, America, Empire, and Inequality
Ferguson Speaks on the Need for Imperial Ruthlessness
A. Clarke, Rwanda, and “Narcissistic Compassion”
Honest Mistakes? The New York Times on "The Failure to Find Iraqi Weapons"
Urban Race Relations: "Everything Changed" After 9/11?
Forbidden Connections: Class, Cowardice, and War
The "Repair" of "Broken Societies" Begins at Home
Deep Poverty, Deep Deception: Facts That Matter Beneath The Imperial