getting hard not to notice that most of president Bush's major speeches
are being delivered in military forums -- at bases, war colleges, naval
academies, and the like.
It makes sense. A rising
percentage of the U.S. citizenry -- 62 percent in a
November AP-Ipsos poll
-- disapproves of Bush's Iraq policy.
Thanks largely to that policy, the president's approval ratings are at an
all-time low. He's being openly mocked on dominant entertainment media and
challenged in the halls of Congress.
Earlier this week, General Electric Television (NBC) gave the New
Yorker's Seymour Hersh a couple minutes on the happy morning Today
Show to pitch an article that starkly depicts the militaristic madness
of boy-king George. Hersh quotes a number of current and former military,
intelligence, and administration officials to reveal an increasingly
detached and messianic president who is "impervious to political pressure
even from fellow Republicans." According to insiders, Bush believes "God
put me here" to occupy Iraq. A "Pentagon adviser" told Hersh that Bush is
"not going to back off" the occupation" because the president sees his
illegal and immoral Iraq policy as "bigger than domestic politics." By
Hersh's informants' account, "bigger" means "divinely inspired."
It's also hard not to observe that Bush justifies his defiance of
democratic mass opinion by claiming a special, direct, and higher
relationship between the president as Commander-In-Chief and the
supposedly loyal soldiers of his curiously terrorist "war on terror."
Most U.S. citizens want a quick exit from Mesopotamia. A rising number of
the nation's Congresspersons are calling for a timetable for the pullout
of troops. And, for what it's worth to U.S. policymakers, more than 70
percent of the Iraq's lawmakers and more than 80 percent of that nation's
populace want U.S. and British forces out.
So what?, says Bush, appealing above the heads of the mere citizenry (the
supposed masters of policy in a democratic society) to the noble and
virtuous mercenaries and gendarmes of U.S. empire.
"To all who wear the uniform," Bush told the Naval Academy's junior cadets
Wednesday, "I make you this pledge: America will not run in the face of
car bombers and assassins as long as I am your commander in chief."
Is "Bring'Em On" Bush still trying to make up for his flight from
"service" in an earlier imperial and racist war (the War on Vietnam) that
Whatever, the president appears to think that his most solemn pledge
of allegiance is to his mercenary ("volunteer" and therefore non-citizen)
military, not the populace.
"We the People" may have decided that its time for U.S. policymakers
to show the courage to reverse the criminal "mistake" that is the
occupation of Iraq. But Bush has "bigger" duties to fulfill than honoring
public opinion. His obligation to God and "all who wear the uniform"
trumps his secondary responsibility to the citizenry.
Barely acknowledging and severely downplaying antiwar sentiment at home,
Bush told the Naval Academy's recruits that "the many [Americans]
advocating an artificial timetable for withdrawal are sincere. But I
believe they're sincerely wrong. Pulling our troops out before they
achieve their purpose," Bush insisted, "is not a plan for victory."
Withdrawal will only make things worse, the president argued, for the
Iraqis, the Middle East, the U.S., and the world.
Troop levels in Iraq, Bush proclaimed, will be determined by "the good
judgment of our commanders" and "not by artificial timetables sent by
politicians in Washington."
Someone should inform the citizens' elected (however imperfectly)
officials that they only seek fake ("artificial") schedules for
And someone might remind the Commander-in-Chief that Congresspersons are
sent to Washington as representatives of the people from the far-flung
geographic corners and districts of the entire nation.
Bush is incorrect in his claim that American withdrawal would worsen the
situation for Iraqis and others. Still, the president should be reminded
that democracy is not contingent on the people being correct in its policy
views. As Thomas Jefferson once observed, the democratic ideal elevates
popular government as in and of itself, not merely a cover for the wishes
of the supposedly smarter and superior "elite".
With his miserable Iraq policy revealed as an historic and
monumental crime and fiasco, the "messianic militarist" (Ralph Nader's
description of Bush in 2004) president is assaulting the most valuable
strands of the American political tradition. He is wrapping his terrible
war crimes in the falsely patriotic and inverted flag of militarism as an
end in itself. In his rhetoric and that of others on the right (e.g. Fox
News), militarism as such is the rising rallying cry.
The call for militarism qua militarism is buttressed by treacherous
charges of cowardice. It relies on Mafia-like appeals to credibility in
the threat to use violence and on chilling calls to "honor the dead" with
It's a curious approach, perhaps, for a former draft-dodger like Bush II,
but the deeper issue goes beyond "Dubya's" character. It even eclipses the
near-term direction of U.S. policy in Iraq.
Beneath it all lurks the fateful question of whether the world's most
powerful nation is going to follow the enlightened path of popular
government and democracy or the authoritarian trail of imperial militarism
and divine right.
is a Visiting Professor of American History at Northern Illinois
University. His latest book is
Empire and Inequality: America and the World Since 9/11 (Boulder,
CO: Paradigm Publishers, October 2004). He
can be reached at: email@example.com.
Other Recent Articles by Paul Street
"Cowardice" Card: Militarism's Last and Self-Fulfilling Refuge
Clinton Was No Champion of the Poor
Media and Damage Control in the Wake of a Not-So Natural Disaster
All-Too American Tragedy of New Orleans: Empire, Inequality, Race and Oil
Separate, Unequal: Race, Place, Policy & Racism Avoidance in and Around
China, Two Deficits, and the Ongoing Decline of US Hegemony
Was a Minor Crime
* The Nuclear
Option” and the One Party State
Schiavo, 84,000 Black Men, and Dominant Media's Selective Morality
* “Because We
Luther King. Jr. and “The Triple Evils That Are Interrelated”
Motivates Us to Kill the Enemy
to Troops in Iraq: “Fight Naked...Life’s a Bitch and Then YOU Die”
Apology for Dissent: Truth and Cowardice
Love, Hates, Kills, Dies
on Tape and the Broader War Criminality
United States: “As Menacing to Itself and the World As Ever”
* The Fabric
of Deception and Liberal Complicity
Reflections: Resentment Abhors a Vaccum
* The 9/11
Commission Report: Bush's Negligence Didn't Happen
* Notes on
Race, Gender, and Mass Infantilization
Descending Spiral Ending in Destruction for All-Too Many”
Democratic Empire and Atrocity Denial
Predictable Failure to Make Bush Pay for Rising US Poverty
Control, Costas, the Olympics and Imperial Occupations Past and Present
* JF Kerry:
“I am Not a [Redistribution] Democrat”
White Men and Why Segregation Matters
"Vile Maxim" Versus the Common Good: Different Approaches to November
* We Need
a New Media Relationship
States” at Home and Abroad
* Be “Part
of Something”: Sign Up With The American Empire Project
Congratulations, Mr. Bush: You Have Not Presided Over the Final Collapse
Had Jobs Too"
v. Board Fifty Years Out: Still Separate and Unequal
* Let Them
England, America, Empire, and Inequality
Ferguson Speaks on the Need for Imperial Ruthlessness
A. Clarke, Rwanda, and “Narcissistic Compassion”
Honest Mistakes? The New York Times on "The Failure to Find Iraqi Weapons"
Urban Race Relations: "Everything Changed" After 9/11?
Forbidden Connections: Class, Cowardice, and War
The "Repair" of "Broken Societies" Begins at Home
Deep Poverty, Deep Deception: Facts That Matter Beneath The Imperial