|
September 2005 Articles
|
||
|
DV Articles
November 2003
|
Our perception of Lori Berenson has been clouded by a bewildering recent series of rulings and counter-findings surrounding her case. Lori Berenson has been imprisoned in Peru for almost ten years for allegedly conspiring with terrorists. (The grim anniversary of her imprisonment is upcoming in November). New challenges and complications in the Andean region and its neighbors have only exacerbated the situation. In his Second Inaugural Address, President Bush strongly endorsed liberal-humanitarian interventionism, saying: “The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.” Yet the reach of this rhetorical vision of freedom is not meant to stretch to every corner of the globe. In spite of this shortcoming, we must reanimate our awareness of the Berenson case, placing it in the new context of the Bush administration’s worldwide proactive democratic aspirations. This article will illuminate why this case is so important to any reexamination of the values of American foreign policy....(full article)
It's interesting to see former Democratic President William Jefferson Clinton speaking for the poor and against those who would distribute wealth yet further upward in America. Two Saturdays ago, Clinton told ABC News that "you can't have an emergency plan that works if it only affects middle-class people and up and when you tell people to do something they don't have the means to do you're going to leave the poor out." Clinton added that Tropical Storm Katrina pointed up steep "class division[s] that often play out along racial lines" in America. Before making these comments, Clinton reminded ABC that poverty fell in the United States (U.S.) during his presidency. As Clinton knows, American poverty has risen during every single year of the George W. Bush presidency -- the first time that the nation's official deprivation gauge has gone up for five consecutive years. . . . Fair enough on Reagan and the two Bushes. But how "different" and more socio-economically and therefore (by Clinton's analysis) racially democratic was administration policy under Bill Clinton, the self-appointed post-Katrina champion of the poor? By Clinton's account, McClellan's "deep history of injustice" was under egalitarian federal assault during the years of the Clinton regime. The record suggests otherwise....(full article)
Malcolm X once said, “Any person who claims to have deep feeling for other human beings should think a long, long time before he votes to have other men kept behind bars -- caged. I am not saying there shouldn’t be prisons, but there shouldn’t be bars. Behind bars, a man never reforms.” On Friday, September 9th I became one of the roughly 25,000 people released from an Illinois prison this year -- 600,000 nationally -- after completing only 10 weeks of a one-year sentence due to extreme overcrowding. My crime was victimless, simple possession of a controlled substance, specifically a small amount of marijuana and MDMA. But as the rare upper-middle class educated White American in prison, I found myself in a truly alien, self-perpetuating world of crushing poverty and ignorance, violent dehumanization, institutionalized racism, and an entire sub-culture of recidivists, some of whom had done nine and ten stints, many dating back to the Seventies. Most used prison as a form of criminal networking knowing full well they would be left to fend for themselves when released. We were told on many occasions that an inmate was worth more inside prison than back in society. Considering it costs an average of $37,000 a year to incarcerate offenders, and the average income for Black Americans is $24,000, and only $8,000-12,000 for poor Blacks, one can easily see their point....(full article)
Michael Brown’s
B-rated performance before a congressional investigative committee
provided some welcome relief from an otherwise depressing week of bad
news. It was like watching Suzanne Sommers play Lady Macbeth; poor Brownie
was in way over his head. The ex-FEMA chief stuck close to his Karl Rove
script and didn’t give an inch to the blustery congressmen. He growled and
snapped at the questions, bristling with indignation one minute and then
faking compassion the next. All the while, he kept passing the buck to
everyone within a 200-mile radius. It was a pitiable presentation with
Brown refusing to answer even the easiest questions without first
consulting his army of lawyers. While Brown was testifying, the new
casualty figures from Hurricane Katrina were pouring into the various news
outlets, pushing the death toll upwards towards the 1,000 mark....
Since right-wingers have successfully co-opted supposedly left-wing political parties (examples are rife: Clinton’s neoliberalism under the sponsorship of the Democratic Party in the United States; Blair and the Labour Party in Britain; Chrétien and Martin with the Liberal Party in Canada; and most glaringly, Deng Xiao Peng’s obliteration of the people’s revolution led by the Communist Party in China), it would hardly be surprising that right-wingers have masterly encroached into progressive media. Indeed right-wing sources fund many progressive media. Having said that, a serious problem of method and principle arise when decidedly progressive writers and keen observers of the American Empire adopt the analytical methodology and vocabulary of imperialist decision makers and their think tanks. In addressing such a phenomenon, I must emphasize that it seems rather odd that at a moment such as this when reactionary, criminal forces control the West and when all progressive elements of society must harness their energy to confront the enemies of civilization sitting in Washington, London, Paris, Ottawa, and Moscow, I have to take on progressive writers....(full article)
In the three years that Jose Padilla has been locked away in solitary confinement, the government has been unable to cobble together enough evidence to even charge him with a crime. They have nothing on him, just the ever-changing claims of a Justice Department that shows less respect for justice than it does for personal liberty. Originally, Attorney General John Ashcroft claimed that Padilla was a “dirty bomber” who intended to detonate nuclear material within the US. Two years later, Ashcroft reversed his claims saying that Padilla was planning to blow up apartment buildings with natural gas pipelines. Just recently, the government changed its story for a third time, saying that Padilla was “on the battlefield” in Afghanistan which made him an enemy combatant. This last twist to the story came in response to the ruling in Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld which allows the government to indefinitely detain any American citizen “picked up off the battlefield” while fighting the US. It’s a fabrication, of course, but the DOJ doesn’t mind the sloppiness of the deception as long as their goals are achieved; in this case, the permanent imprisonment of an American Muslim. The Padilla case is of particular interest now that we have a genuine case of domestic terrorism we can use for comparison....(full article)
On September 12, KTLA reported that in New Orleans “federal public safety officials said that a military C-130 cargo plane was to begin spraying clouds of insecticide . . . to kill a growing population of disease-bearing mosquitoes.” The authorities noted that this spraying “would not pose a health threat.” Really? (full article)
It's one
thing to lie in politics. It's another to be caught in a lie. Bill Frist
has been caught in a lie. His political future is over. The immediate
question is, can he survive as Majority Leader? The Tennessee Republican
claims he wasn’t privy to any inside information leading up to the sale of
his stock in Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), the country’s largest
for-profit hospital chain founded by Frist’s father, Thomas, and brother,
Thomas Jr., weeks before the company reported lower than expected earnings
July 13 that sent the stock south. Now the Securities and Exchange
Commission is investigating the matter, a spokesman for the senator said
last week, to determine if Frist broke any laws....(full
article)
Revenge of the Shift
Worker “A dull people all work and no play can make.” That is what Yoda would say about Americans if he were to travel from that galaxy far, far away to Planet Earth and, more specifically, the United States. While the U.S. is blessed with a wealth of leisure and entertainment facilities, many Americans have insufficient time to utilize them....(full article)
Here are questions that are not being asked about the latest twist of a cynical war. Were explosives and a remote-control detonator found in the car of the two British SAS special forces men “rescued” from prison in Basra on 19 September? If true, what were they planning to do with them? Why did the British military authorities in Iraq put out an unbelievable version of the circumstances that led up to armoured vehicles smashing down the wall of a prison? According to the head of Basra’s Governing Council, which has co-operated with the British, five civilians were killed by British soldiers. A judge says nine. How much is an Iraqi life worth? Is there to be no honest accounting in Britain for this sinister event, or do we simply accept Defence Secretary John Reid’s customary arrogance? “Iraqi law is very clear,” he said. “British personnel are immune from Iraqi legal process.” He omitted to say that this fake immunity was invented by Iraq’s occupiers....(full article)
The UN’s nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, officially signed Iran’s death warrant yesterday. By passing a US-backed resolution that refers Iran’s nuclear program to the Security Council, the member states have endorsed America’s genocidal Middle East policy and paved the way for another war. Even though Tal Afar, Samara and other civilian enclaves are still under a withering attack from American forces, and even though reports of rampant prisoner abuse and torture continue to surface around Falluja, and even though increasing numbers of young Sunni men, who’ve been beaten and shot in the back of the head, are being fished from the Euphrates River every day, the sycophantic Euro-allies have thrown their support behind a resolution that will unavoidably lead to another war. Everyone who signed on to this treacherous pact is equally culpable of the misery it will inevitably produce....(full article)
I have been thinking for a while now that the Democrats really should sit down and consider changing their mascot from a donkey to a marmot. A rodent really is more emblematic or their provincial habits than a donkey could ever be. Think about it. Just this past weekend antiwar rallies were held across the country and the Democratic leadership was nowhere in sight. They had hightailed it out there. They hid in their holes and were afraid to be seen....(full article)
This is Part Two of the explosive five-part interview series Joshua Frank, author of Left Out!, did with University of Colorado Professor Ward Churchill this summer....(full interview)
Reviewing the last few weeks is like backing up a scream on TV. This “President” not only delayed aid to dying people, he actively blocked and prevented access to aid from around the world. He sealed off the exits and drowned an excess, unwanted, poor population like rats. Those who survived and made it out to shelters around the country find that their poverty has been, in effect, criminalized. They are no longer free to come and go. And the Democrats act like this is normal. Their lack of proportionate response to disaster engineering and disaster profiteering is a key element in normalizing the increasingly militarized takeover we are witnessing. Their silence, especially on the war, has become positively eerie. Not one major Democrat attended the September 24 anti-war mobilization. If they know something we don’t know, it ain’t good....(full article)
We will never fully
comprehend the complexities of our planet. For centuries, we have labored
to overcome and alter the course of nature. We have redirected the path of
great rivers, destroyed vital ecological systems, pumped toxic waste into
our waterways, oceans and atmosphere, and buried massive stockpiles of
deadly chemicals and radioactive waste deep in the bowels of the earth. We
may not fully comprehend the role of human interaction with the forces of
nature but we are all born with an innate understanding that if we poison
our own living space, there will be a price to pay. When we witness
melting glaciers, warming oceans, altered climates and shifting oceanic
currents, followed by a chain of catastrophes, we do not require a panel
of experts or an executive commission to inform us that something is
radically astray. It is increasingly clear that we have entered an age of
unprecedented catastrophe and we are woefully unprepared to cope with it.
In the wake of 911, we have invested hundreds of billions in Homeland
Security but in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, we are hard
pressed to know what that means. Apparently, Homeland Security does not
include the fundamentals of civil defense: communications, evacuation,
emergency shelters, food, water, fuel, generators and medical
facilities....
At the 2005 Annual National Meeting in Tulsa, Oklahoma, the Green Party arrived at a fork in the road. The delegates voted down resolutions offered by Greens for Democracy and Independence (GDI) designed to ensure proportional representation inside the party, national delegates accountable to the expressed will of the membership, and political independence from the two corporate parties. These votes fly in the face of everything that the Green Party’s platform and membership stand for. As Maryland senatorial candidate and Green Party member Kevin Zeese rightly points out, “the overwhelming majority of Greens support real democracy -- based on the principle of one person-one vote -- and want the Green Party to stand for something different than the Democrats or Republicans.” “The Tulsa decisions exacerbate the already growing rift in the party. The ramifications of these decisions must be reversed if the Greens are to truly challenge the corporate parties. This can only happen if Greens across the country are willing to fight to take back their party. Only an uprising by the membership will reinvigorate the Green Party,” added Zeese. At Tulsa, two currents came into conflict over the future of the Party -- an assertive, radical wing embodied by the Greens for Democracy and Independence (GDI) and a passive, liberal wing led by David Cobb and others closely tied to the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA)....(full article)
It’s reasonable to estimate that more than a quarter of a million people demonstrated against the Iraq war on Saturday in Washington, Los Angeles, San Francisco and other U.S. cities. The next day, the Washington Post front-paged a decent story that described “the largest show of antiwar sentiment in the nation’s capital since the conflict in Iraq began.” But more perfunctory back-page articles were typical in daily papers across the country. And over the weekend, many TV news watchers saw little or nothing about the protests. Hurricane Rita was clearly a factor. But even without dramatic natural disasters, the news media are ready, willing and able to downplay news about war -- and the antiwar movement -- for any number of reasons. Conventional wisdom on Capitol Hill or in newsrooms can tamp down media coverage of a surging movement. What’s crucial is that the movement not allow its momentum to be interrupted by media treatment....(full article)
Why is there a “war” for salmon instead of co-operation to share in the harvesting of what should be a sustainable resource? In his book Salmon Wars: The Battle for the West Coast Salmon Fishery, Dennis Brown examines and chronicles the battles for sharing the salmon catch between corporations and fishermen, the US and Canada, as well as First Nations fishermen and commercial fishermen. Brown expresses concern for the working fisherman. This progressive tendency is expected as Brown has a varied background in salmon fishing, coming from a long line of fishermen and having worked as a union representative and government advisor. Much of his book details attempts to renegotiate a Canada-US Pacific Salmon Treaty on how to share the anadromous fish that refuse to confine themselves to national waters. The treaty negotiations were marked by strident disagreements between neighbors. Canadian fishermen are upset that US fishermen are allegedly taking Canadian salmon. The notion of Canadian salmon versus American salmon is intriguing. From another viewpoint, the fact that people were living on the Pacific coast and harvesting the salmon before Canadians and Americans throws into doubt this notion of state-ownership of salmon....(full article)
The leadership of the Democratic Party never tires of their role as doormat to their Republican overlords. Fresh off their stunning defeat in the John Roberts appointment to the Supreme Court, the main players -- Clinton, Dodd, Kennedy, Biden, Kerry and Feingold -- have announced they will forgo attending the massive antiwar rallies in New York, Washington and across the nation. Even now, when the “anti-Iraq” mood of the nation has shifted as dramatically as two plates in the San Andreas Fault, the foremost sentinels of the party are too timid to budge. What a useless collection of stuffed shirts and pompous windbags. Even the moniker “Democratic leadership” is a contradiction in terms. Their solitary interest is perpetuating their own miserable careers and reveling in the incipient narcissi of their office. They’d rather see the nation bullied and plundered by autocrats and sadists then jeopardize their precious tenure in Congress and their lofty aspirations for higher office. After all, standing on principle might torpedo that lucrative deal as lobbyist with the defense industry when retirement roles around. Where’s Hillary Clinton when her loyal supporters need her? (full article)
Does anyone actually watch the TV shows they watch? Medical Investigation for example. On the surface this drama looks like just another mildly entertaining medical show. But watch closely and you begin to see the creepy undertones of neoconservative ideology, with its concomitant fundamentalist Christianity, embedded in the storylines and characters. In each episode the illnesses are caused (not necessarily in a direct way) by an anti-social behavior or as a consequence of some un-American activity. We see the lead character enter a church, cross himself and pray for guidance. A complex man, a top scientist, grappling with issues of faith and science? Not likely. The good doctor is not conflicted at all and there is no competition between his science and his faith. But perhaps more disturbing than the mainstreaming of fundamentalist religion is the way in which a conservative political agenda is implanted in the show. For example, a disease outbreak appears to be coming from an American factory known to be polluting water. Eventually the real culprit is revealed to be across the border in unhygienic Mexico where people don't wash their hands. The overarching sense of this show is that conservative orthodoxy is the only position to take. There is no dissent, no doubting Thomases, and no rebel bucking the system (unless they are on the path to realizing their mistakes). Instead Medical Investigation is a bunch of committed believers: in God, their government and the essential rightness of those beliefs....(full article)
The poor of New Orleans -- especially poor African Americans -- suffered the brunt of Hurricane Katrina’s devastation in the city, thanks to the criminal neglect of authorities at every level of government. Now, the wealthy elite wants to rebuild on its terms -- and prevent large numbers of Katrina’s victims from ever returning. But the politicians and business interests will face a fight -- in a city with a rich tradition of resistance. Mike Davis is an author and activist whose books include City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, The Ecology of Fear and the forthcoming The Monster at Our Door: The Global Threat of Avian Flu. He spoke to Socialist Worker’s Lee Sustar about the political impact of Hurricane Katrina....(full article)
We are only interested in one thing regarding the melee that broke out in Basra following the arrest of two British commandoes on September 20: whether or not the car they were driving contained explosives? The answer to that question could decide the future of Iraq as well as the fate of Bush’s war on terror. Nothing should deter us from getting to the bottom of this crucial question and no extraneous fact or fiction should divert our attention from uncovering the answer....(full article)
You have to hand it to the Bush administration. No matter how bad things might be in Iraq, and no matter how dim the prospects are for Iraq's future, Bush & Co. still manage to look the public straight in the eye, smirk, and insist that the decision to invade Iraq was a good one. Call them determined, even stubborn. Call them dishonest, perhaps delusional. Regardless, the fact is that by invading Iraq, the Bush administration opened a Pandora's Box with global consequences. Bush and his apologists have frequently promised that the invasion of Iraq will spread democracy and stability throughout the entire Middle East. That naive declaration could not be farther from the truth. Not only is Iraq itself in the clutches of a civil war, the U.S.-led invasion threatens to destabilize the whole of the Middle East, if not the world. It may have irrevocably done so already. By most definitions and standards, Iraq is already in the throes of civil war. Whether defined as an internal conflict resulting in at least 1,000 combat-related fatalities, five percent of which are sustained by government and rebel forces; or as organized violence designed to change the governance of a country; or as a systematic and coordinated sectarian-based conflict; the requirements of civil war have long since been satisfied in Iraq....(full article)
It's not every day Amnesty International asks me to go see a Nic Cage movie. So, when I got their e-mail about "Lord of War," I promptly caught a bargain matinee at my local multiplex. This is not a movie review but, by Hollywood standards, "Lord of War" rates R for radical...and I was pleased to witness a film about the governments and freelancers supplying the weapons that kill men, women, and children every minute of every day....(full article)
If Washington wants a war with Iran, then there’ll be a war with Iran. That’s the great lesson of the Iraq war: once the decision is made, there’s no turning back. So, why are the main players -- England, France and Germany -- stumbling over themselves trying to placate Bush as though the conflict can be avoided? Threatening to bring Iran before the Security Council won’t alter the administrations plans one bit. In fact, it will probably only strengthen their case. Bush will use the flimsiest of reasons for initiating hostilities, so the EU-3 should skip the frantic diplomacy and stop doing Washington’s bidding. Like the Downing Street memo stated, “The facts and intelligence are being fit to meet the policy.” It’s the same here. No amount of groveling from the EU-3 will appease Bush once Tehran is in its crosshairs. The Big-3 would be better off sending arms and ammo to Iran so the people can defend themselves once the bombs start dropping. The implications of a preemptive war against Iran are appalling. The Islamic state has no nuclear weapons, no nuclear weapons program, and there’s no proof that it plans to develop nuclear weapons in the future. In other words, the US is planning an attack against a nation that does not even meet its minimal requirements for preemptive war. Iran is no threat to anyone. It does, however, sit on vast reserves of oil and natural gas, a consideration that may have factored heavily into the battle strategy....(full article)
In Central America
the relentless upward trend in oil prices is provoking crisis in the parts
of the region's electrical energy system dependent on oil. Panama,
Nicaragua and Honduras are the countries in the region most dependent on
oil imports. Overall Central America sources over 70% of its energy
requirements from oil, imported mostly from Mexico and Venezuela. Only
Costa Rica has made determined efforts to avoid energy dependence on oil.
Its State power company generates over 80% of its electricity from
hydroelectric sources. The neoliberal privatization craze of the 1990s
resulted predictably in little long-term investment in renewable energy
from geo-thermal or wind generation. Opportunist foreign companies
invested in quick and dirty oil powered generating plants to get a cut of
the region's wide open energy market. The same short-term approach to the
region's transport needs has emphasized road infrastructure to the virtual
exclusion of all other options . . . . With oil prices trending
consistently higher, the failure of the "free market" to meet the majority
of people's fundamental energy and transport needs becomes plainer almost
week by week. But longer-term implications of this crucial fundamental
economic reality have yet to sink in to governments hopelessly trying to
follow faith-based "free market" ideology. Belatedly they may have started
to flirt with renewable energy initiatives like wind-power for electricity
generation or sugar cane derived ethanol for transport fuel, but the
budget arithmetic of oil imports has already overtaken most of the region
with a vengeance....(full article)
Dodging the Costs of the Warfare State
The
New York Times began a new week with an editorial that typifies the
media mind-set of the warfare state. The Sept. 19 editorial warns of dire
consequences from a growing deficit that has been boosted by tax cuts --
in combination with “the pre-Katrina priorities laid down by Mr. Bush.”
Those priorities include a U.S. military budget that has reached half a
trillion dollars per year. But the Times editorial does not devote
a single word to military spending or the Iraq war. Why not mention the
option of an American pullout from Iraq, where the U.S. war effort has
already drained $200 billion from taxpayers? Well, those who determine
editorial positions at the New York Times -- and the other major
newspapers in the country -- cannot bring themselves to call for a quick
end to the U.S. military role in Iraq....
A Prescription for
Exclusion: Bush Administration
Adopts a Chunk of Heritage Foundation's All-Encompassing Agenda to Rebuild
Gulf Coast
While Karl Rove, the White House deputy chief of staff and President Bush's chief political adviser -- some call him "Bush's Brain" -- is waiting to see if he will be indicted for his role in the Valerie Plame Affair, he has been named by Bush to lead the reconstruction effort in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. And, based on President Bush's address to the nation on Thursday, September 16, the blueprint for rebuilding will be less "New Deal" and more "New Steal" -- another opportunity for Team Bush's corporate donors and cronies to cash in on the misery of hundreds of thousands of Americans. There is little doubt that the Rove-guided rebuilding effort will be paying close attention to a recent Special Report issued by the Heritage Foundation on September 12, spelling out a series of guidelines and recommendations for Gulf Coast's recovery....(full article)
A key motivation for the Iraq War must
certainly be the desire of American policy planners to secure petroleum
reserves with which to fuel the American military in the 21st Century.
American armed forces are all about mobility and global reach, and they
require a tremendous quantity of fuel for all that high-speed,
long-distant and low miles-per-gallon mobility. Without liquid hydrocarbon
fuels, there is no "superpower" military, and without that there is no
American empire. Petroleum is the lifeblood of the American war machine.
The American consumer, as well, has an unquenchable thirst for petroleum,
using it in large inefficient automobiles, luxury trucks, and recreational
vehicles of many kinds. Reducing America's desire for oil would help rein
in American imperialism and aggression. Any such reduction is unlikely to
occur in the military, by the very nature of its purpose. So, Americans
opposed to the Iraq War and American imperialism favor a significant
reduction in the civilian consumption of petroleum, most particularly as
gasoline fueling transportation....(full
article)
The Occasional Media Ritual of Lamenting
the Habitual Dan Rather caused some ripples when he spoke at a law school in New York on Sept. 19 and warned that politicians have been putting effective pressure on the corporate owners of major broadcast outlets. Summarizing his remarks, the Hollywood Reporter said that the former CBS anchor contended “there is a climate of fear running through newsrooms stronger than he has ever seen in his more than four-decade career.” When a network TV correspondent makes noises that indicate a possible break with the corporate media establishment, I think of something that Mark Twain said: “It’s easy to quit smoking. I’ve done it hundreds of times.”....(full article)
Republicans like to brag that, as a political party, they are more fiscally responsible than their Democratic counterparts. Well, thanks to President Bush’s four years in office that theory can now take up residence in the urban legend department. If anything, Bush’s tenure as president proves that the Republican tax cuts (which everyone knows truly benefits the wealthiest one percent), drastically slashing funds in the federal budget for much needed improvements to the country’s aging infrastructure (a perfect example being the outdated power grid), and trying to get away with launching wars on the cheap, have cost taxpayers and their unborn grandchildren more money than anyone could have ever imagined....(full article)
The
movement for peace and justice in the USA has been transformed during the
past two months. But what is the nature of the change, and how will it
help to move us forward? The short answer, I think, is that we have been
enriched by sorrow; we gather upon a sorrow plateau. Because of this place
we have come to, we have new opportunities to broaden the scope of our
power to sustain lasting change for freedom. Sorrow is the new power that
Cindy Sheehan brought into the movement last month. And the power of our
sorrow has grown in response to the sufferings caused by hurricane
Katrina. This sorrow has not overcome us, but it has infused our
motivations. Out of this sorrow comes a renewed sense of our struggle's
significance....
This headline appeared in the London Independent in early February of 2005, following a conference at the Hadley Centre in Exeter, England, where 200 of the world’s leading scientists issued the most urgent warning to date: that dangerous climate change is taking place today, and not the day after tomorrow. Floods, storms, and droughts. Melting polar ice, shrinking glaciers, oceans turning to acid. Scientists from the fields of glaciology, biology, meteorology, oceanography, and ecology reported seeing a dramatic rise over the last 50 years of all the indicators of climate change: increase in average world temperatures, extreme weather events, in the levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and in the level of the oceans. The award winning environmental writer Geoffrey Lean wrote: “Future historians, looking back from a much hotter and less hospitable world . . . will puzzle over how a whole generation could have sleepwalked into disaster -- destroying the climate that has allowed human civilization to flourish over the past 11,000 years.”....(full article)
I have a word of advice I would like to offer Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon chieftains who currently preside over the 200 or more hunger strikers at Guantanamo Bay, 20 of whom are near death. For God’s sake, let them die. What more could you possibly want from them? They’ve already provided you with the subjects you needed for your newly perfected sense-deprivation techniques and your sadistic methods of torture. They supplied you with the lab rats for your new drugs, your improved methods of psychological torment, and your sexually deviant abuses. Now, let them die. The experiment is over. Show that there is some speck of humanity left in your withered heart by allowing these men to pass away with dignity, the dignity you deprived them of in life....(full article)
In more than two years since the United States initiated hostilities against Iraq, there has never been a positive identification of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Never. That doesn’t mean that he doesn’t exist; it simply suggests that prudent people will challenge the official version until his whereabouts and significance in the conflict can be verified. At present, much of the rationale for maintaining the occupation depends on this elusive and, perhaps, illusory figure. It’s odd how Al-Zarqawi appears at the precise coordinates of America’s bombing raids, and then miraculously vanishes unscathed from the scene of the wreckage. This would be a remarkable feat for anyone, but especially for someone who only has one leg....(full article)
They
can’t stop the antiwar movement, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t trying.
On Monday, September 19 Cindy Sheehan spoke in New York City’s Union
Square to a group of supporters and onlookers when police rushed in to
break up her speech as it was winding down. “I was speaking and
someone grabbed my backpack and pulled me back pretty roughly,” Sheehan
told the Associated Press. “I was shoved around.” Police arrested
organizer Paul Zulkowitz, who was charged with disorderly conduct as well
as for using an unauthorized sound device. For anybody that has been
through Union Square in the past few weeks, you’ve probably seen Zulkowitz
(a.k.a. Zool) who heads up “Camp Casey NYC,” a small group of local
activists who set up an encampment over a month ago to show their
solidarity for Sheehan’s quest to end the Iraq war. Zool’s arrest was most
likely a coordinated effort meant to disrupt the ongoing antiwar
vigil....
Advertising gurus Gerald Rafshoon and Doug Bailey, who were on opposing sides during the Jimmy Carter-Gerald Ford campaign in 1976, have come up with a pretty good alternative to financing Katrina reconstruction with taxpayer money. They propose a 90-day moratorium on fundraising by political parties and members of Congress. That would free up more than enough money to pay for Katrina. Here’s another: Instead of closing 22 major military bases and “realigning” others, we should keep those facilities open so that no one has to flee to anything like the New Orleans Astrodome or the Convention Center ever again....(full article)
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon showed his true colors earlier this week as his normative praise of “democratic values” subsided. “I announced as clearly as I could that we formally oppose Hamas’ participation in the election as long as it is not disarmed and has not cancelled the Hamas charter, which is a horrible document,” Sharon stated on last Wednesday. On Saturday, he went further in an interview with reporters in New York, rejecting calls for democratic elections in the Occupied Territories, “We will make every effort not to help [the Palestinians]. I don't think they can have elections without our help.”....(full article)
In a 1973 court case involving General
Motors, documents showed that a GM engineer had created a cost-benefit
analysis to decide whether or not to correct a serious defect in the
company’s Malibu model. The analyst calculated that GM would pay $200,000
in legal costs for each of the projected 500 lives lost each year due to
the defect. Fixing the defect, the study showed, would be more expensive
than paying the costs of litigation. So they didn’t fix it. .
. . George Bush’s failure to protect
against the predicted attacks of September 11 and now Hurricane Katrina
can only be understood if we’re willing to follow the same unimpeachable
logic GM used -- just think in dollars and cents; ask yourself who
benefits. Hint: White House political guru Karl Rove has been put in
charge of the massive post-Katrina reconstruction effort, and already it
is clear that the same folks who got all those sweetheart, no-bid
contracts in Iraq will be inking the really big deals....
It’s anybody’s guess what happens next in Iraq. After thirty months of experimentation with the pet theories of the neo-con political fantasy labs, even diehard supporters of the invasion can’t escape the reality that the outcomes thus far are light years away from the rosy predictions of a ‘cakewalk.’ At every juncture, the administration and neo-con think tanks have bamboozled the public with best case scenarios of how events might unfold. The fact that the policy makers in Washington have been so ‘wildly off the mark’ has not deterred Bush from issuing new rationales for his imperial misadventures along with optimistic forecasts of how the conflict might yet evolve. Despite the monotonous public pronouncements of ‘progress’ in Iraq, even George Bush must have his doubts. As the draft of the Iraqi Charter was being finalized, the president phoned Abdul Aziz Hakim, the Shia cleric who heads the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI). The purpose of the call was to convince Hakim to lighten up a bit and accommodate some Sunni demands for a few changes to the draft. By all accounts, the SCIRI chief refused to give the president an inch....(full article)
On the
specific subject of violence and atrocities, from the Korean and Vietnam
Wars until present, no one can deny there has been a remarkable sliding of
the American state into adopting torture comparable to Nazi and Israeli
standards of practice. Namely, torture, rape, racial anger, religious
anger, mass murder, destruction of property, collective punishment, and
disdain for established civilizations have become institutionalized,
codified, taught, and are the preferred method for putting down liberation
movements, which the US and other imperialists propagandistically call
“insurgencies”. However, laying the blame solely at the feet of the
troops and the political-economic elites is an attempt at abrogating the
responsibility of the citizenry to oppose war, aggression, or occupation.
Opposing wars of aggression is an individual and a societal
responsibility, especially the overtly illegal mayhem and chaos that the
US has been fomenting in Iraq. One antiwar writer argued, “Because the
civilian leadership unlike the military is always indebted to public
opinion for its existence, it’s ultimately public approval rather than
military need that drives air war against civilians, which is why the
corporate media obligingly does its bit to keep that approval going.”.....
Ward Churchill is a professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and recently came under fire for an article he wrote following September 11, 2001 titled, "Some Push Back." He is also the author of numerous books, including On the Justice of Roosting Chickens and A Little Matter of Genocide. Churchill recently sat down with Joshua Frank to discuss his ordeal, and this is the first part of their five-part interview....(full article)
Dissident Voice has received many reader accolades for our coverage of Hurricane Katrina and its grim aftermath. We've also received letters from a few readers that -- as a matter of sheer ideological blindness rather than genuine sympathy and solidarity with their countrymen and women -- defend the Bush administration's utterly pathetic response, and pose the question as to what solution(s) would we have come up with in dealing with the hurricane. In response, we offer this fictional account of how a humane, organized government can work in the face of such a disaster, by the President of Accent on Travel-USA....(full article)
Blackwater represents the globalization of repression: a free market progeny that is transforming the people’s army into privately owned militias for multinational corporations. The deployment of these armed units is a clear threat to public safety and personal liberty. The decision to send Blackwater mercenaries to New Orleans was not made haphazardly. A recent Washington Post article indicated that Donald Rumsfeld would use the military more extensively within the US if there were another terrorist attack on American soil. It’s clear now that the use of mercenaries was integral to that plan and that Rumsfeld wants Americans to acclimate to the idea of seeing troops deployed within their cities....(full article)
The day after Hurricane Katrina hit, exposing much of the public to the tragic conditions of poverty in America, the Census Bureau quietly released its annual report entitled, “Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States.” In some respects, it provided a demonstrable backdrop to the pockets of poverty common to New Orleans and other cities. It also explained why, despite President Bush’s assertion last month that, “Americans have more money in their pockets,” many people aren’t faring as well as they once did. The report indicates that in 2004 there was no increase in average annual household incomes for black, white, or Hispanic families. In fact, this marks the first time since the Census Bureau began keeping records that household incomes failed to increase for five consecutive years. Since President Bush took office, the average annual household family income has declined by $2,572, approximately 4.8 percent....(full article)
The brilliant and prolific left sociologist C. Wright Mills once said that the core purpose of meaningful analytical work on social and political affairs was to make relevant connections between individual pain and structural inequality. The point of such work, by Mills' reckoning, was to de-atomize personal difficulty and relate it to broader contextualizing forces of class, race, bureaucracy, and unjust power and authority. The dominant authoritarian and neoliberal ideology of our time works in the opposite direction. It tells us to separate the personal from the societal. It expects us to think of ourselves and others as purely autonomous sole actors -- a veritable mass of self-produced Robinson Crusoes (with Crusoe's slave Friday deleted from the formulation), each living on his or her own island of possessive-individualist economic rationality and "personal responsibility."....(full article)
Hugo Chavez’s
performance at the UN was greeted with the bucket loads of bile that
one expects from America’s rightward-titling media. Washington Post
hatchet man Colum Lynch provided a typical summary of the speech by
dismissing it as “a rant” from the Venezuelan “bad-boy”. But, Lynch isn’t
alone in his hostility. The outpouring of venom came from all corners,
appearing in many newspapers across the nation, invoking the hackneyed
expressions of contempt for any foreign leader who rebuffs Washington or
who follows redistributive economic policies. In fact, the speech was a
brilliant and impassioned analysis of the current state of the world and
of the United Nations. Chavez noted that the original intention of the
gathering had been “completely distorted” by the so-called reform process
introduced by John Bolton. The reforms are entirely designed to transform
the UN into a cats paw for American power creating greater flexibility for
Washington’s preemptive wars and for dismantling the foundations of
international law. They signal the demise of the UN as a legitimate forum
for world development and an invitation for Bush and co. to act with even
greater impunity....(full article)
Iraqis to Bush -- Where Did All Our Money
Go? I have come to the conclusion that even if I live to be 100, I will never be able to track down every Bush-connected profiteer involved in this phony war on terror scheme. According to a report released in March 2005 by Transparency International (TI), an international organization that focuses on matters of corruption, Iraq could become "the biggest corruption scandal in history."....(full article)
Statement of Ralph Nader, on
the nomination of John G. Roberts Jr. by President George W. Bush to be
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States submitted to the
Senate Judiciary Committee, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., September 12,
2005....(full article)
US Military in Paraguay Prepares To
“Spread Democracy”
Controversy
is raging in Paraguay, where the U.S. military is conducting secretive
operations. 500 US troops arrived in the country on July 1st with planes,
weapons and ammunition. Eyewitness reports prove that an airbase exists in
Mariscal Estigarribia, Paraguay, which is 200 kilometers from the border
with Bolivia and may be utilized by the US military. Officials in Paraguay
claim the military operations are routine humanitarian efforts and deny
that any plans are underway for a US base. Yet human rights groups in the
area are deeply worried. White House officials are using rhetoric about
terrorist threats in the tri-border region (where Paraguay, Brazil and
Argentina meet) in order to build their case for military operations, in
many ways reminiscent to the build up to the invasion of Iraq....(full
article)
Japan Deeper into Neo-Liberalism Here in Japan, it is the aftermath of the snap elections called by Prime Minister Koizumi, held on September 11, no doubt double-milking the symbolism; an election that was won by the ruling Liberal Democratic Party by a landslide, enabling the LDP and its coalition partner, New Komeito, who now together hold 327 of the Lower House of the Diet's 480 seats, to pass any laws they please. If the ruling class in Japan decided tomorrow that they wish to legislatively categorize the status of the working classes as slaves, they can now pass the law to do so!! As it happened, the Koizumi strong-handling of the LDP rebels who voted against his “postal reform” bill, and his use of “assassin candidates” to run against the rebel members (all 37 of them), paid off. It also must have been quite helpful to have had the encouraging help of the New Komeito, who, despite their supposed pacifist doctrine of Buddhism, have been strong supporters of Koizumi’s leading of Japan down the path of more militarism....(full article)
Cindy Sheehan's courageous
actions in Texas have captured the imaginations of an American public
desperate for an end to this madness. We must give them something they can
get behind, while the Bush/PNAC Regime is vulnerable, and before the next
big Distraction we all sense is imminent. Let's send an unmistakable
message of unity and determination to the world, and end this now before
things get any worse. Since the demonstrations which reversed the
electoral decision in the Ukraine, I've heard and seen many Ukrainians
talking about large groups of foreigners who were pivotal to their
planning. Many of these groups were the ones responsible for paying for
the food, shelter, and orange banners used by the protestors. I didn't
think much of this, or the accusations of funding from agencies such as
the CIA, until I saw the same thing occurring in Lebanon. Then, a reporter
for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Carol Off, did a piece
explaining that the "spontaneous, grassroots" protests in the Ukraine were
the result of CIA funding and planning over a period of ten years. Sadly,
the report lauded these tactics of Regime Change, but nonetheless, proved
my point....
As most people know, George W. Bush has thought of a way to make up for his most recent display of corruption-based incompetence. He declared a Day of Prayer. It was held this past September 16, and no doubt will become an annual event, complete with lucrative contracts for private security companies to maintain order. But in any case, Bush’s brainstorm gave me an idea, too. And, as they say in old movies, it’s crazy but it just might work. I propose that every sane person still remaining in the U.S. start asking God to rid us, once and for all, of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the rest of their crime syndicate. It doesn’t matter HOW they disappear. We can let God work out the details....(full details)
In the last few days, I have received e-mails that are routinely issued by journalist Greg Palast. These concerned the British MP (Member of Parliament) in the House of Commons, George Galloway. Mr. Palast admixed criticisms of Mr. Galloway with generous helpings of name-calling abuse; examples of the latter included such things as “Brit-hole”, “arse-licking”, “self-promoting fart,” and “swamp-thing”…among others. I didn’t expect this. Even in his most trenchant criticism of that other George, the one we Americans know better than we’d like, Mr. Palast has never, to my knowledge, engaged in similar flame-throwing. Mr. Palast -- Greg -- are you all right? (full article)
Since the so-called Gaza disengagement, US President George W Bush has reiterated his call that people ought to be "thanking Ariel Sharon" for keeping Israel's word about dismantling its occupation of Palestinian territory. What does Sharon's history tell us? (full article)
Judging by the coverage of Louisiana’s watery inferno, though the left and
right keep tearing each other apart on everything else like endlessly
divorcing spouses, on the inhumanity of man left to his own devices, they
coo in one voice....(full article)
Division of Funeral Corp. Charged With
Desecrating Corpses A funeral services company which recently learned that one of its subsidiaries is negotiating a lucrative contract with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to remove dead bodies in areas ravaged by Hurricane Katrina, paid $100 million to settle a class-action lawsuit several years ago alleging the company desecrated thousands of corpses and dumped bodies into mass graves. Moreover, the company paid $200,000 to settle a whistleblower lawsuit that sought to expose that two members of the Texas funeral commission, the agency which regulates the funeral industry, were actually employees of the company they were supposed to monitor -- an obvious conflict-of-interest....(full article)
The United States
Supreme Court declared that the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance in
schools was unconstitutional. Some will be happy about this, while many of
us will not care in light of the fact that this same court struck down the
appeals of an innocent woman on Texas’s death row. Last Wednesday night,
the Supreme Court enabled the state of Texas to execute Frances Newton.
Pat Robertson did not ask the governor to spare her life as he did with
Karla Faye Tucker years ago, for only white women who frequently proclaim
Jesus as their own personal savior need apply....
For the most part, the Senate Judiciary Committee's inquiry into John Roberts' nomination to the Supreme Court is just window dressing. His nomination was assured in November 2004 -- as were the next three nominations to the Supreme Court -- when the Republicans gained hegemony in the executive and legislative branches of the government. Notwithstanding all our angst about who we believe should and should not be appointed to the Supreme Court, the reality is that George Bush and his Republican majority in the Senate will appoint anyone they like for a lifetime tenure on the federal bench. Unless photographs appear showing Mr. Roberts in bed with a live boy or a dead girl, or unless the Democrats are willing to finally play their filibuster card (and the odds are 10,000 to 1 that they will not), there is simply no way for the minority party to prevent these judicial appoints. If you think that John Roberts is bad, he will soon have more bad company. As the left exhausts itself in vetting and opposing his nomination, it will wear itself out for the time when Mr. Bush gets around to nominating the ultra extreme right-wing ogres to the judiciary. However, this next batch of judicial nominees also will take their cue from John Roberts. They will be ciphers about how they might rule and they will cloak themselves in ambiguous judicial platitudes....(full article)
Will the Administration's shameful abandonment of New Orleans's African
Americans torpedo its carefully calibrated campaign to woo black voters?
President Bush frequently compares the war in Iraq to World War II. While giving the commencement speech at the U.S. Air Force Academy in June of last year Mr. Bush noted, “Like the Second World War, our present conflict began with a ruthless surprise attack on the United States.” Last month, while speaking at a ceremony commemorating the 60th anniversary of World War II, Mr. Bush again made comparisons between the two conflicts. He said, “As we mark this anniversary, we are again a nation at war. Once again, war came to our shores with a surprise attack that killed thousands in cold blood.” While many Americans are dubious about these comparisons, perhaps we should take the president at his word. Maybe we are engaged in a global war. If that’s the case, then there is ample precedent for Mr. Bush to limit oil profits. Americans expect the president to do something that will lower the cost of gasoline....(full article)
An August 2 report showing that a full third of America’s 8.4 million uninsured children go without any medical care for at least a year is the latest reminder of the inhuman consequences of our broken health system. Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly clear that the Bush administration’s preferred reforms will actually exacerbate existing problems while victimizing the neediest....(full article) September 14
The siege of Tal Afar follows a familiar pattern of brutal American incursions into densely populated areas under the pretense of fighting terrorism. It is a ritual that is repeated endlessly despite the dismal results. The Pentagon seems to prefer these grand displays of military strength to anything that might produce a political solution. It brings to mind the old saw, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again: expecting a different result.” This appears to be the guiding principle of the Defense Department with Tal Afar serving as the most recent example....(full article)
The American Red
Cross addresses attempted fraud on their website by listing their
authorized internet donation sites (CONVIO, MSN, Network for Good, Yahoo,
Amazon.com, and Apple I Tunes) “All
official sites collecting money on behalf of the American Red Cross should
link to one of the approve sites listed below.” the Red Cross’s web page
reads. Further down the page, in bold print, the American Red Cross
emphasizes: “If the web address you are about to make a
donation through does not exactly match one of these websites, do not
donate through that website.” On his
website Frontpagemag.com, David Horowitz took it upon himself to
collect money for the American Red Cross. But is the money really going to
the Red Cross? (full article)
News From Behind The Facade
When I lived in the
United States in the late 1960s, my home was often New Orleans, in a
friend's rambling grey clapboard house that stood in a section of the city
where civil rights campaigners had taken refuge from the violence of the
Deep South. New Orleans was said to be cosmopolitan; it was also sinister
and murderous. We were protected by the then District Attorney, Jim
Garrison, a liberal maverick whose investigations into the assassination
of John Kennedy were to make powerful enemies behind The Facade. The
Facade was how we described the dividing line between the America of real
life -- of a poverty so profound that slavery was still a presence and a
rapacious state power that waged war against its own citizens, as it did
against black and brown-skinned people in faraway countries -- and the
America that spawned the greed of corporatism and invented public
relations as a means of social control; the "American Dream" and the
"American Way of Life" began as advertising slogans. The willful neglect
of the Bush regime before and after hurricane Katrina offered a rare
glimpse behind The Facade. The poor were no longer invisible; the bodies
floating in contaminated water, the survivors threatened with police
shotguns, the distinct obesity of American poverty -- all of it mocked the
forests of advertising billboards and relentless television commercials
and news sound-bites (average length 9.9 seconds) that glorify the "dream"
of wealth and power. A word long expropriated and debased -- reality --
found its true meaning, if briefly....
Considering the entrenchment
of ideological supremacy inside the American polity, is there any relation
between the government’s war options and the American people’s response to
them? Yes, a relation does exist. In fact, once the government goes to war
for its own reasons, the American people, with the exception of a
minority, approve of it, thus becoming extremely vociferous war activists
through their uninformed opinions as reflected in opinion polls. American violence seems
atavistic in nature; i.e., inherited and transmitted from one generation
to the next. This could explain why the system always defends the status
quo. Nevertheless, throughout modern American history, the voices that
opposed US imperialism and its violence have always remained an ostracized
intellectual faction without significant mass movement that could stop or
reverse US insanity in the world. In the case of Iraq, although the
American people now know that US aggression is a product of deception,
although many know about the tens-of-thousands of civilians that the US
forces slaughtered in that hapless nation, the voices that rise up to stop
that insanity are confined to progressive media and scattered fringes of
the American society. Where are the American people and where are those
mythical “values” that Bush fulminates about ad nauseam?
Iran has yet to be declared to be in formal breach of any of its NPT obligations, which raises the basic question: What is it the EU-3 wish to accomplish vis-à-vis their diplomatic intervention? The real purpose of the EU-3 intervention -- to prevent the United States from using Iran's nuclear ambition as an excuse for military intervention -- is never discussed in public. The EU-3 would rather continue to participate in fraudulent diplomacy rather than confront the hard truth -- that it is the US, and not Iran, that is operating outside international law when it comes to the issue of Iran's nuclear program....(full article)
La Jolla, California: An earthquake measuring 5.6 on the Richter scale rumbled through La Jolla last night, shattering windows, uprooting shrubbery, and catapulting startled residents from their beds. President Bush immediately declared La Jolla a disaster area and boarded Air Force One for the scene of the temblor, adamant that the quiet paradise by the sea would receive national disaster funds as soon as possible and that he would visit the distraught survivors and comfort them in person. Thousands of troops from nearby Camp Pendleton and a host of FEMA personnel are assisting in the evacuation of several hundred La Jolla residents. Most were relocated to the Orange County Westin South Coast Plaza, the St. Regis Monarch Beach Resort and Spa, and the Four Seasons at Newport Beach where Northern California vintners, Korbel and Clos Dubois, as well as Wolfgang Puck of Newport Beach, have provided wine and catered gourmet meals for the stranded evacuees....(full satire)
In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, women whose lives were disrupted by the storm face numerous gender-specific vulnerabilities that commonly occur with disasters of this magnitude. For instance, while it will be sometime before the final death toll from Katrina is known, women and children are more likely to die in natural disasters than men (the Tsunami in southeast Asia late last year is the most recent example of this). Female victims of catastrophic events are more likely to lack mobility and resources as well as having care-taking responsibilities that make it more difficult for them to flee. Pregnant women and mothers of newborns in particular face greatly increased health risks. There is also a significantly increased risk of sexual assault, particularly for those who relocated to shelters to escape the storm. Economic uncertainty, increased stress, powerlessness and the scarcity of basic necessities are all contributing factors to the increased risks faced by women. In the aftermath of Katrina, women who were living in violent relationships before the storm hit may experience increased violence in its aftermath and may find themselves dependent on the perpetrators of the violence for their basic survival, particularly if they have been separated from family and social networks....(full article)
Did it really take “Katrina” (or “Corina,” as Bush’s clueless wife, Laura, kept calling it until they stopped her) to demonstrate the utter bankruptcy of the Bush enterprise? And if it did -- why? Why did it take something like this, when the evidence was already plain for everyone to see, in every area and every direction of our national life? (full article)
Save yourselves. America, my native country, a place I no longer recognize, is now an irredeemably wretched land shot through with lunacy and idiocy, a rogue nation on the prowl controlled by murderous madmen enthusiastically supported by tens of millions of spiritually-impaired, common senseless, mentally ill, blood-lusting yahoos. But why mince words? America is a menace....(full article)
We recommend that our readers print out
this incisive special report and read it in print. The author is an
award-winning syndicated columnist, professor of journalism, and a former
emergency management official. This article is an in-depth look at the
Bush policies that created the atmosphere not only for an ineffective
FEMA
response during the Katrina catastrophe, but which may have contributed to
additional property destruction and deaths than should have occurred....(full
article)
Zero Tolerance Even though the Bush administration is now in full spin-and-smear mode, the truly striking thing about their languorous response to Katrina is how little they disguised their lack of concern for residents of the Gulf Coast. That picture of Bush playing the guitar in San Diego during the magic 72-hour window of opportunity for saving lives just doesn’t compute as a lapse in judgment. This administration is nothing if not media- and image-conscious. They do not lose control of the visual. Their slow-walking of aid to Louisiana, the continuing focus on law and order over search and rescue, the alternately stern -- “zero tolerance for lawlessness” -- and forgetful attitudes toward people who were literally dying for want of help: all this was right out in the open. As far as I’m concerned, it reads like a warning. What it says is we are entering a new phase in this rightwing takeover, a phase that is marked, appropriately enough, by a new, glitzier approach to the anniversary of 9/11. While the Bushitters have been shameless in their exploitation of this catastrophe from the fi | |
