|
November 2006 Articles
|
||
|
DV Articles
November 2003
|
There has been considerable controversy regarding the role of psychologists in coercive national security interrogations at Guantanamo and elsewhere. The American Psychological Association (APA) has steadfastly resisted pressure to come out against psychologist participation in these interrogations. (See my "Psychologists, Guantanamo and Torture" and "Protecting the Torturers: Bad Faith and Distortions From The American Psychological Association.") As a result, a movement of APA members has started to withhold dues from the organization as an additional leverage to change the Association's policy. I have been somewhat reluctant to join this movement as I feel it is important for psychologists to stay in the Association for the time being in order to continue attempts to change its policy. However, I have been reassured that withholding dues does not immediately terminate membership. I have thus decided to sacrifice my discounted APA journals and to withhold my dues for 2007. Here is the letter I wrote to Norman B. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of APA, explaining why I am withholding dues.....(full letter)
In the aftermath of Pierre Gemayel's assassination the Guardian raises a key question: "cui bono" (who benefits)? The paper's answer is typical of the mainstream media response to the event which remains confined in its scope to the usual suspects. While there is ample speculation about who might benefit, the context provided only emphasizes a Syrian (and Hizbullah) motive and avoids mention of possible benefits to any other party -- Israel or the March 14 Alliance for instance. As far as the media is concerned, Gemayel was anti-Syrian, hence a Syrian motive and with its alleged precedent of political murder further investigation is unnecessary. To point out the obvious shortcoming in this approach, it is important to look at the context and parameters which invariably lead to the politically serviceable conclusion of Syrian culpability.....(full article)
As the sectarian bloodletting in Iraq intensifies, it is easy to lose track of the American policies that unleashed the carnage. Even the anti-war movement seems to have accepted the conventional wisdom that the insurgency and the Shiite death squads attired in police uniforms were unfortunate and unpredictable byproducts of a noble neo-con project to establish a progressive western oriented state in a turbulent region. The greatest acts of deception in this war of choice were not the WMD allegations or the canard that Saddam was behind the atrocities of 9/11. The bigger lie is that the United States was on an idealistic expedition to fight tyranny and spread the gospel of democracy.....(full article)
Over
the past several years, people who care about what is happening in the
world and who feel compelled to tell the truth about it have had a
tremendous realization: we have the means of production to make
media. This realization has spurred a media revolution in which the
traditional model of passively consuming the news through a corporate
filter has given way to a new model of active citizenship and aggressive
truth-telling. With at least 60 million blogs in existence, according to
Technorati.com, there are a lot of voices vying for our attention.
Though citizen journalists and alternative media-makers often struggle to
find distribution and reach a substantial audience, their presence has
dramatically and positively altered the media-political complex during
this era of
columnists bribed
by administration officials,
news stories
created and prepackaged by federal government agencies,
increasingly
concentrated ownership over the media, nationalism,
profit-seeking, risk-averse careerism, and censorship.....
It is fair to assume that war resistance may not be popular in a lot of circles, but in the long haul what really are the accomplishments of war? Few to nil in my opinion except for mass destruction and death. The question is: has the time come for war resistance and will it at some point become a force for mighty social change? (full article)
Emilio Estevez’s film Bobby opened in theaters across the country last week. It received mixed reviews from most critics, who nevertheless praised Estevez, the son of actor Martin Sheen, for making a “serious” movie that attempts to capture the political atmosphere in the U.S. on the eve of Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968. Whatever its shortcomings as a film, the major problem with Bobby is political -- it regurgitates all of the myths about Robert Kennedy and his brother, President John F. Kennedy. The greatest of all the myths about the Kennedys is that if the two brothers had lived, then much of the “turmoil” of the 1960s, particularly the U.S. war in Vietnam, would have been avoided. For many liberals, Robert Kennedy’s assassination represented “the end of the ’60s” -- the end of the road for progressive political change and the beginning of three decades of conservative rule. Is any of this remotely true? (full article)
According to Seymour Hersh’s latest New Yorker shocker, the CIA has found no evidence of a secret Iranian nuclear weapons program. The White House, given a draft assessment in the fall, has been “hostile” to the agency’s report. Now why would that be? Why no sighs of relief? Why no, “Thank you guys,” and pats on the back for all their careful intelligence work? (full article)
While Bush administration members have made a sport of breaking the law, both domestically and internationally, their intransigence will come back to haunt -- one way or another. The Bush Doctrine of taking "the battle to the enemy," for example, is a direct repudiation of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits the use of international force unless in self-defense (after an armed attack across an international border) or related to a UN Security Council decision. And that explains why Bush's 2002 National Security Strategy makes a point to "protect Americans" from "the potential for investigations, inquiry, or prosecution" by the International Criminal Court "whose jurisdiction does not extend to Americans and which we do not accept."....(full article)
Top shelf conservative Christian
evangelicals, GOP political leaders, and a host of right wing pundits,
columnists, and radio and television talk show hosts have just about
finished hashing out the whys and wherefores of Election 2006's "thumpin."
Much post-election talk has centered on both the actions of the so-called
"values voters," and what the election results might means for the future
of the Christian right. Some conservatives have moon-walked away from
their defeated GOP brethren faster than Michael Jackson in his prime.
Focus on the Family's Dr. James Dobson has argued -- in a post-election
statement and on a Thanksgiving Eve appearance with CNN's Larry King --
that it wasn't that conservative social issues were rejected by the
voters, it was that the GOP didn't push the conservative social agenda
hard enough. Meanwhile, direct-mail guru Richard Viguerie, and former
Republican congressman and current MSNBC talk shot host Joe Scarborough,
appear to have gotten what they had been touting for months -- a
repudiation of the GOP. They hope, however, that this will lead to a
revitalization of the conservative movement.....(full
article)
Using Words, Not Weapons: Students Weigh
in on the Draft
If politicians and pundits are discussing,
in retrospect, a universal draft as a war deterrent, it would behoove them
to check in with today's prospective draftees to ask what they think about
it. In the process, the draft debate might be replaced with a larger
question. Instead of older adults arguing about how and which young
persons should be used for national defense purposes, the question would
be whether adults can figure out how to get along in the world without
making the unnatural sacrifice of their young. The volunteer organization
with which I work, Nonmilitary Options for Youth, does regular literature
tabling in Austin's public high schools. While we are there, we ask
students what they think about the draft issue, the Iraq war and military
recruitment on campus. Last year, we conducted an informal, anonymous
written survey on these issues, with approximately 600 students
participating across 12 schools. Responses indicated a variety of strong,
reasoned opinions, and students seemed to appreciate being asked....
The Total Surveillance Society is possibly about to get a new boost in Britain where police are considering posting microphones to identify and record aggressive street conversations, the Times reports: "Police and councils are considering monitoring conversations in the street using high-powered microphones attached to CCTV cameras, write Steven Swinford and Nicola Smith. The microphones can detect conversations 100 yards away and record aggressive exchanges before they become violent. The devices are used at 300 sites in Holland and police, councils and transport officials in London have shown an interest in installing them before the 2012 Olympics." The interest in the equipment comes amid growing concern that Britain is becoming a “surveillance society.” It was recently highlighted that there are more than 4.2m CCTV cameras, with the average person being filmed more than 300 times a day. The addition of microphones would take surveillance into uncharted territory.....(full article)
Yesterday [November 23], most of us initiated the “Holidays” by performing the annual rite of gratitude. Millions gave thanks for living in a nation that has become obscenely corpulent by suckling at the teats of genocide, slavery, and imperialism. Sandburg once christened Chicago “hog butcher for the world”. Accounting for a mere 5% of the world’s population while gluttonously devouring a quarter of the world’s resources easily qualifies the United States as “hog to the world.” And meanwhile.....(full article)
Viewers of the November 15, 2006 airing of Democracy Now were given the treat of seeing Amy Goodman's interview with former Senator George McGovern, current Congressman Dennis Kucinich and the American Enterprise Institute's Joshua Muravchik. The subject under discussion was titled: "Out of Iraq or More Troops?" A "treat"? Yes, viewers (or readers of the transcript) were able to see Mr. Muravchik, an acerbic-tongued neoconservative militarist, in action. Mr. McGovern started the debate by recommending a gradual withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, commencing in December and ending in June 2007. Congressman Kucinich supported Mr. McGovern's gradual withdrawal, but proposed to give it teeth by having Congress cut off all future funding for the war. Mr. Muravchik advocated sending "a lot more troops" "until we can bring some order to Iraq.".....(full article)
(Remarks to the first in a series of “Last Sunday” community gatherings in Austin, TX, November 26, 2006) We billed Last Sunday as a place for people to come together to explore the intersections of the political, artistic, and spiritual. The idea came out of conversations among friends: Eliza Gilkyson, a singer/songwriter with interests in politics and spirituality; Jim Rigby, a minister who has a knack for stirring up trouble, theologically and politically; and me, a professor involved in a variety of political groups. There are lots of organizations and movements taking up issues that we care about. Last Sunday was designed not to compete with those, but to create a different kind of space, where people could bring all aspects of themselves for conversation and connection. The name plays off the “First Thursday” tradition on South Congress Avenue, with perhaps an invocation of the Last Supper for some, though I want to be clear that none of us has any messianic inclinations.....(full article)
The good news is that the Republicans lost. The bad news is that the Democrats won. The burning issue -- US withdrawal from Iraq -- remains as far from resolution as before. A clear majority of Americans are opposed to the war and almost all of them would be very happy if the US military began the process of leaving Iraq tomorrow, if not today. The rest of the world would breathe a great sigh of relief and their long-running love affair with the storybook place called "America" could begin to come back to life. A State Department poll conducted in Iraq this past summer dealt with the population's attitude toward the American occupation. Apart from the Kurds -- who assisted the US military before, during, and after the invasion and occupation, and don't think of themselves as Iraqis -- most people favored an immediate withdrawal, ranging from 56% to 80% depending on the area. The State Department report added that majorities in all regions except Kurdish areas said that the departure of coalition forces would make them feel safer and decrease violence.....(full article)
“The
history of the criminal case of Mumia Abu-Jamal, which is by now almost 25
years old, has been characterized by bias right from the start: against a
black man whom the court denied a jury of his peers, against a member of
the economic underclass who did not have a real claim to a qualified
defense, and against a radical, whose allegedly dangerous militancy
obliged the state to eliminate him from the ranks of society.”
So writes German author
Michael
Schiffmann in his new book Race Against Death. Mumia Abu-Jamal: a
Black Revolutionary in White America (an expansion of Schiffmann's PhD
dissertation at the University of Heidelberg), just released in Germany
this past month. In 1982, Abu-Jamal was convicted of killing white
Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner and sentenced to death in a
trial that Amnesty International has declared a "violation of minimum
international standards that govern fair trial procedures and the use of
the death penalty." Schiffmann writes that a third person (not Abu-Jamal
or his brother Billy Cook) most likely shot and killed police officer
Daniel Faulkner on the morning of December 9, 1981. This third person was
Kenneth Freeman (Billy Cook's friend and business partner), who --
according to the available evidence -- was a passenger in Cook's car.
Freeman likely shot him in response to Faulkner shooting Abu-Jamal in the
chest, and was therefore the black male that six eyewitnesses reported to
see fleeing the scene moments before other police arrived....(full
article)
Syria is a Convenient Fall Guy for
Gemayel’s Death Commentators and columnists are agreed. Pierre Gemayel’s assassination must have been the handiwork of Syria because his Christian Phalangists have been long-time allies of Israel and because, as industry minister, he was one of the leading figures in the Lebanese government’s anti-Syria faction. President Bush thinks so too. Case, apparently, settled. Unlike my colleagues, I do not claim to know who killed Gemayel. Maybe Syria was behind the shooting. Maybe, in Lebanon’s notoriously intrigue-ridden and fractious political system, someone with a grudge against Gemayel -- even from within his own party -- pulled the trigger. Or maybe, Israel once again flexed the muscles of its long arm in Lebanon. It seems, however, as if the last possibility cannot be entertained in polite society. So let me offer a few impolite thoughts.....(full article)
There are no “accidents” in Middle East politics. This week’s
assassination of Lebanese Industry Minister, Pierre Gemayel can only be
understood in the context of the ongoing struggle between the competing
political forces in the region. Presently, the United States is the big
loser in this regard due to its failed campaign in Iraq. The war has
severely damaged the perception of US military invincibility and triggered
a stunning rejection of Bush’s policies in the in the midterm elections.
Now, the political paradigm in America has shifted and a phased withdrawal
of American troops could begin in a matter of months. Needless to say,
this is not the outcome that the hawks in Washington or Tel Aviv had in
mind. Could the assassination of Gemayel be an attempt to forestall the
impending withdrawal of American forces?
Egypt remains the kind of police state where people say pretty much what they please -- in cafes, in taxis and at social gatherings. But if you dare to convert public sentiment to ink on the front page of a major opposition paper -- watch out. Because, one way or another, the powers that be are going to figure a way to get their pound of flesh. Stifling political dissent is an art form and some dictators are better at it than others. The thing about Mubarak is that he always goes for quality -- not quantity. They’ve got this Egyptian saying that if you beat down an unshackled man, the guy in leg irons is going to take notice. So, it should surprise no one that the regime is now going after one of the undisputed lions of the Egyptian opposition press -- Wael El-Abrashi, the executive editor of Sawt Al-Umma. In the dock with her boss is Hoda Abu Bakr -- a tigress who is a prominent journalist with Abrashi’s paper. Remember these two names. Because if Egypt ever emerges from its dark night under authoritarian rule, these two scribes will deserve their fair share of the credit.....(full article)
Economic empire building (EEB) is the driving force of the US economy and became more central over the past five years. More than ever before in US economic history, the principal US banks, oil companies, manufacturers, investment houses, pension and mutual funds all depend on exploiting overseas nations and peoples to secure high rates of profit. Increasingly the majority of banking and corporate profits accrue from overseas plunder. As EEB becomes central to the viability of the entire US economy, competition with Europe and Asia for lucrative investment rates and economic resources intensifies. Because of heightened competition, and the crucial importance of overseas profits, corporate corruption has become a decisive factor in determining which imperial centers, MNCs and banks will capture lucrative profit-generating enterprises, resources and financial positions. The centrality of corruption in imperial expansion and in securing privileged positions in the world market exemplifies the increasing importance of politics, in particular relations with states in the imperial re-division of the world. Globalization, so-called, is a euphemism for the increasing importance of competing empires intent on re-dividing the world. Corrupting overseas rulers is central to securing privileged access to lucrative resources, markets and enterprises.....(full article)
When we examine the consequences that have flowed from the creation of Israel, when we contemplate the greater horrors that may yet flow from the logic of Zionism, Israel's triumphs appear in a different light. We are forced to examine these triumphs with growing dread and incredulity. Israel’s early triumphs, though real from a narrow Zionist standpoint, have slowly mutated by a fateful process into ever-widening circles of conflict that now threaten to escalate into major wars between the West and Islam. Although this conflict has its source in colonial ambitions, the dialectics of this conflict have slowly endowed it with the force and rhetoric of a civilizational war: and perhaps worse, a religious war. This is the tragedy of Israel. It is not a fortuitous tragedy. Driven by history, chance and cunning, the Zionists wedged themselves between two historical adversaries, the West and Islam, and by harnessing the strength of the first against the second, it has produced the conditions of a conflict that has grown deeper over time....(full article)
Michele Naar-Obed's open letter to the judge who sentenced her husband, Greg Boertje-Obed, to a year and a day in federal prison in November 2006 for hammering on the concrete lid covering the missile silo which houses the Minuteman III nuclear missile....(full letter)
Is O.J. Simpson more important than the greenhouse effect? Consider this: I just typed "O.J. Simpson" into a Google News search. The first page alone provided links for almost 2500 recent stories. The results for "global warming," however, totaled roughly 300. Thus, by media standards, O.J. Simpson appears to be at least eight times more significant than climate change. Obviously, media coverage doesn't always correlate to value. Douglas Futuyma, a professor of ecology and evolution at the State University of New York in Stony Brook, recently talked to CNN about global warming. "It's not just down the road somewhere," said Futuyma. "It is just hurtling toward us. Anyone who is 10 years old right now is going to be facing a very different and frightening world by the time that they are 50 or 60." And guess what? It's our fault.....(full article)
Recently, we've been plied and pummeled with
the absurd proclamation that "the system worked" -- that our congressional
representatives listened and took note of the collective, antiwar
fulmination of the people, registered in our faux republic's latest, sham
plebiscite. Yes, I suspect, the political classes of Washington did hear
the people's thunder -- and then went running for cover within the comfort
zones of their sheltering smugness, constructed of the brick and mortar of
arrogant power and inequitable privilege. Just ask Joe Lieberman. He's the
self-satisfied fellow seated comfortably upon the large, plush lounge
chair, stuffed with campaign dollars, nearest the door with access to K
Street. But we must not let ourselves -- the true beneficiaries of empire
-- off so easily: Our national tragedies (from all the corpses amassed,
buried and forgotten in our imperial wars to our intransigence and denial
regarding Global Warming) are a collaborative effort with our leaders -- a
joint and living lie of the mind, made manifest by collective desire and
remorseless pursuit. Upon the occasion of our cultural confabulation of
colonial hagiography dubbed "Thanksgiving," a tradition when we stuff our
overweight bellies by devouring big, growth hormone-injected, flightless
birds in order to celebrate, what in truth was a Thanks-taking of this
land by our ancestors from its original inhabitants (but a hearty
salutation of "Happy Genocide Day" doesn't exactly stimulate the appetite,
does it?), I will address the following missive to you my fellow
unindicted (perhaps even unconscious) co-conspirators in the crimes of our
country.....(full article)
No Peace, No Place for Palestine
Finally. Someone has noticed what is going on in the Middle East. The UK
Telegraph
reports
that Britain is "furious" with Israel because of the damage it is causing
in Gaza. Is it because of the wholesale slaughter of innocent Palestinians
-- the bombing of a Gaza beach that turned the entire family of
12-year-old Huda Ghalia into a smoking pile of human flesh and scattered
body parts? No? Then, perhaps it is because of Israel using innocent
Palestinians as human shields, gunning down children as they scurry
fearfully to school, burying the wounded alive
Jenin-style?
Or
maybe Britain is at long last enraged by the
massacre of 19 Palestine refugees, mostly women and children in the
northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun on November 8. Maybe Britain was aware
of the little-reported six-day siege which had ended just the day before
the assault when Israeli ground forces had been withdrawn from Beit Hanoun
after slaughtering 50 and injuring many more. In response to the public
outcry at the November 8 slaughter, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
explained that it was caused by a mere "technical error." Olmert did admit
he was "uncomfortable" with the "event," but said military operations in
Gaza would continue, and that further mistakes "may happen.".....
CBC News ran an article based on Associated Press files that began: “‘Massive’ human rights violations are being committed in the Gaza Strip, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour said Monday as she kicked off a tour of the region.” Human rights violations -- committed by whom and against whom? This passive construction conveys an image of agent-less human rights violations against anonymous victims. The reader is, however, later informed that 19 members of the Al Athamna family in the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun were killed in an Israeli artillery attack. CBC News cited “Israeli officials” who acknowledged an error. CBC News never bothered to tabulate the numerous zionist errors/massacres over the years, such as at Qana, Nablus, Jenin, Beit Lahiya, etc. Even if the Beit Hanoun massacre were an error -- and the only error -- should that exculpate the zionist regime from condemnation and sanction? (full article)
Let’s face it, while the Palestinian and Arab resistance evolves into an absolute example of the ultimate heroism and collective patriotism, the Palestinian solidarity movement in the UK and around the world is not exactly what could be called a profound success story. In fact, it would be erroneous to state that this is really the fault of those who dedicate their time and energy to it. Supporting the Palestinians is a complicated subject. Though the crimes against the Palestinians have taken place in broad daylight and are not some well-kept secret, the priorities of the solidarity movement are far from being clear. When thinking about Palestinian society we are basically used to thinking of some sharp ideological and cultural disputes between the Hamas and PLO. Not that I wish to undermine that staunch disagreement, but I am here to suggest an alternative perspective that perhaps could lead towards a different understanding of the notion of Palestinian activism and solidarity both ideologically and pragmatically.....(full speech)
If Big Pharma cared one iota about the unborn fetus, at a bare minimum, it would call off its hired guns traveling around the country peddling SSRI antidepressants to pregnant women by convincing doctors to prescribe the drugs and ignore the studies and FDA warnings that say SSRIs are associated with serious birth defects. On October 16, 2006, the first lawsuit in the nation was filed against GlaxoSmithKline in which an infant charges that his life-threatening lung disorder was caused by exposure to the SSRI Paxil in the womb during his mother's pregnancy.....(full article)
When I first began hearing CNN journalist and news anchor Lou Dobbs being interviewed a month or so ago on radio and TV about his new book, “War on the Middle Class,” I was interested in learning more. I’ve never been a fan of Dobbs given what I’ve picked up were his racially discriminatory -- racist -- views on illegal immigration of Latinos from Mexico and Central America. But I was intrigued when, in the media interviews, I heard him castigate the Democrats and Republicans as parties bought and controlled by big business. He called for action to address the health care crisis and took other generally progressive positions. So I bought and read his book.....(full review)
In this remarkable year of attention to many
hot issues, especially political corruption and the Iraq war, voter
turnout was just over 40 percent, no better than the previous midterm
election. One valid view of why 60 percent of eligible voters did not vote
is that they saw little difference between the two major parties and,
therefore, that their votes do not matter. It’s “they’re all a bunch of
crooks and liars” belief, bolstered this year with so much evidence of
crooks in congress and liars in the Bush administration. Where supporters
of Republicans or Democrats see different positions on issues, cynical
citizens see nothing but campaign propaganda and civic distraction through
divisive issues. So they do not vote their conscience or for lesser-evil
candidates. Most have too little information about third party candidates
to vote for them. . . . The 2006-midterm elections showed the importance
of votes for third party candidates who keep fighting for a place in the
American political system, despite being intentionally disadvantaged by
very little money and media coverage......
The Kipplization of Mankind Are you drowning in a sea of meaningless words, gestures, and products? Is unfettered inanity driving you to the brink? Will you be rendered a catatonic, drooling, postmodern zombie by superfluous information? Author Philip K. Dick coined the term “kipple” in his 1968 sci-fi novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? It is defined as “unwanted or useless objects” and is capable of reproducing on its own. Dick asserts in the book, via the character of Buster Friendly, that the earth will eventually succumb to an all-encompassing layer of kipple. The concept of kipple has been compared to the second law of thermodynamics, which is known as entropy (the degradation of all matter and energy in the universe to an ultimate state of inert uniformity). Try to imagine all of the junk currently occupying the world. I mean every useless tchochtke, every synthetic doodad, every single physical object that serves no discernable function or purpose. Now try to imagine this massive store of junk together in one place. Picture a veritable sea of refuse that will surely outlive us all.....(full article)
With a newly elected Democratic Congress trying to put the brakes on the worst American president in history, many are breathing a sigh of relief. A number of Democratic legislative goals would impact working people positively: increasing the minimum wage, decreasing student loan rates, negotiating for lower Medicare drug prices, and promoting alternate energy sources. To prove they are tough on national security, Democrats will tighten security at ports and vulnerable industrial plants, and possibly increase the size of the military. Egregiously destructive Republican environmental policies will be stymied and small positive steps will be taken to decrease our ravenous appetite for oil. A mild ethics law may be passed. Republicans will fight each issue with every political weapon in their arsenal. Unfortunately, Bush and the Republicans dug the country into a hole so deep, we may never recover. After an orgy of deregulation, globalization, free-market pirating, privatization and the unprovoked invasion of Iraq, Americans will have to cope with the destructive long-term results.....(full article)
Last week President Bush appointed Dr. Eric Keroack to serve as the Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for Population Affairs. This position is primarily responsible for overseeing the Office of Family Planning, which is charged with providing access to contraceptive information and supplies to low-income individuals. But Dr. Keroack has a long-standing opposition to contraception and abortion. Through this appointment, President Bush will severely limit contraceptive information and choices to many of America’s poorest women.....(full article)
“Some propositions are so dangerous that it may even be ethical to kill people for believing them.” Who penned this ugly little medievalism? The Taliban? Stalin? A National Socialist contemplating what to do with German labor organizers? Perhaps a puritanical do-gooder off to purge satanic elements hidden under the foliage's bright taches shrouding sleepy seventeenth century Salem in a gorgeous autumnal firestorm? No, this winsome sentiment was recently expressed by yet another of America's just-add-water "public intellectuals," one Sam Harris, atheism's would-be heresiarch in the politically incoherent age of War for Oil on Terror. In his The End of Faith, a short work the careless might take for a polemic against organized religion, Harris’s central theme is that "all reasonable men and women have a common enemy . . . Our enemy is nothing other than faith itself.".....(full article)
In a world of spin, no one expects truth from corporate executives or the politicians who serve them, but many of us hold out hope that in the classroom and sanctuary we can engage one another honestly in the struggle to understand the world and our place in it. So, while I’ve had my share of squabbles with schools and churches over the years, I remain committed to them as important truth-seeking institutions. As a university professor who has recently returned to church membership, I have a lot riding on those hopes, which is why it was particularly disappointing in recent weeks to be scheduled for speaking engagements and then abruptly canceled by a Catholic diocese and a private high school in Texas. In both cases, some people in the institutions were eager to have me share my knowledge and experiences, only to have the leadership give in to complaints from conservatives. My disappointment wasn’t personal -- I’ve been rejected enough to be able to roll with these punches -- but about a concern for the future if the institutions we count on to create space for dialogue are so easily cowed. The problem isn’t that I lost chances to speak, but that everyone lost a chance for engagement.....(full article)
On November 9, 2006, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-Peoples Army, (FARC-EP) sent an “Open Letter to the People of the United States.” It was specifically addressed to several Hollywood producers and actors (Michael Moore, Denzel Washington and Oliver Stone) as well as three leftist academics (James Petras, Noam Chomsky and Angela Davis) and a progressive politician (Jessie Jackson). The purpose of the open letter was to solicit our support in facilitating an agreement between the US and Colombian governments and the FARC-EP on exchanging 600 imprisoned guerrillas (including two on trial in the US) for 60 rebel-held prisoners including three US counterinsurgency experts.....(full article)
For some time now we’ve been hearing about
the so-called housing bubble and what effect it could have on your net
worth and future. Well, the numbers are finally in and you can decide for
yourself whether its time to sell now or try to ride out the storm. In
2000 the total value of homes in the US was $11.4 trillion. Today that
number has shot up to $20.3 trillion, nearly double. At the same time,
mortgage debt in 2000 was a trifling $4.8 trillion (about half) while in
2006 it skyrocketed to a whopping $9.3 trillion. So, how do we explain
these enormous increases in value? After all, wasn’t the housing boom just
the natural outcome of “supply and demand”? No it wasn’t. That’s an
unfortunate myth that should be interred with the withered remains of
Milton “free market” Friedman.....(full
article)
Respect for All So it seems Republican voters have finally turned. With the arsenal of election-rigging techniques the Republican Party has been working up since 2000 -- including caging and purge lists, push polls, insufficient machines in Democratic areas, uncounted provisional ballots, robocalls, unfair rules from corrupt secretaries of state -- it has long been abundantly clear that Democrats will never take office with a narrow win. And those are just the surface obstacles. The deep structure of our electoral system tilts to the right: the senate is an anti-democratic institution with empty-box red states getting the same number of senators as far more populous blue states; the mid-census gerrymandering of districts favors Republicans across the country; and the electoral college’s winner-take-all rules and weighting in favor of smaller states blunt liberal gains. Given all of that, it’s hard to fault Howard Dean’s fifty-state strategy of putting up conservative Democrats to run in conservative states. It worked. That’s the good news and the bad news....(full article)
A typical day in Iraq will see two or three U.S. troops and dozens of Iraqis killed. That day will be followed by many more of the same. All because our government leaders cling to the nationalistic vanity of futilely seeking to “win” a despicable war that’s absolutely wrong and utterly indefensible by universally accepted standards. Meanwhile, antiwar activists chant “Peace, now!” in our streets. They do so because peace deferred means indefinite death, terrible dismemberment, and long years of suicide inducing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Many more Americans who served in Vietnam committed suicide, after returning home, than were actually killed in combat. That grim reality should haunt us all during uneasy, pensive moments before our nightly sleep. How do we exit Iraq? There’s only one correct way.....(full article)
On Friday, George W. Bush arrived in Vietnam with the intention of strengthening business ties with that nation and used his photo op to make one of the most jaw-dropping statements of his presidency regarding the subject of history. “History has a long march to it,” he banally proclaimed as we all yawned, recalling that his major at Yale, where he barely managed to maintain a 2.3 average, was history. Then came the clincher as Bush was asked if any lessons from Vietnam apply to the war in Iraq: “One lesson,” he babbled, “is that we tend to want there to be instant success in the world, and the task in Iraq is going to take awhile. It’s just going to take a long time for the ideology that is hopeful, and that is an ideology of freedom, to overcome an ideology of hate. We’ll succeed unless we quit.” Oh really, the “lesson” of Vietnam is that we shouldn’t “quit”? There it is again, that Orwellian mindset that has pervaded this administration; war is peace, and evil is good. No one should be shocked that Bush has no sense of history, that he has never read anything beyond the Reader’s Digest version of it, and that he willfully ignores the genuine lessons of the Vietnam era, but every American should be outraged by this statement, but one of the myriad reasons the vast majority of Americans have allowed the most criminal administration in the history of this nation to continue unabated, with nary a peep of indignation, is that they themselves have so little knowledge of their history.....(full article)
Against the Day is the story of a quest. Perhaps for reason, perhaps for reasons beyond reason. Perhaps for an understanding of the human experience. The story of a family named Traverse, which must be more than a mere family name. The father, Webb Traverse, ostensibly an itinerant miner in North America's West a couple decades after the US civil war, he is also a bomber whose sympathies lie with those opposed to the robber baron capitalists that populate the estates and boardrooms of the United States. The men whose general perception of the men from whose sweat and blood they make their millions is a perception that sees those workers as unworthy of life. Pynchon doesn't exactly condemn capitalism as much as he describes the inevitable progression of that system of economics to its ultimate expression in war and bloodshed. Which is condemnation enough. To the robber baron Scarsdale Vibe, Webb Traverse is somehow different. He is considered not just an opponent, but an opponent that must be sought out and killed. Once dead, he is brought to a place that is beyond boot hill, beyond Tombstone -- a place where vultures of the human and avian type rule. Reading this particular section, I was reminded of William Burroughs' grotesque visions of the western lands. As it turns out, the youngest Traverse is provided an education by the same robber baron that ordered Webb's death. The daughter, meanwhile, marries the triggerman. Of course, the desire for justice cum revenge reveals its head along the plot line. Indeed, two of the brothers begin their travels with exactly such a thought. The Traverse family finds itself part of every facet in the tale. Mathematics and monopoly capitalists. Anarchy and anal sex. Airships and manned submarines built by Italian anarchists. Meteors that change the earth and murders accompanied by grotesque tortures that defy belief. It is not a pretty world provided here, but it is an interesting one that is full of adventure and surprise.....(full article)
The October issue of
Harper’s Magazine contains an essay by George McGovern (the
Democratic anti-war presidential candidate who ran against Nixon in 1972,
he carried one state -- Massachusetts) and William Polk (founder of the
Center for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Chicago). This
essay “The Way Out Of War: A Blueprint For Leaving Iraq Now” is an attempt
to give a workable liberal democratic exit strategy to extricate the U.S.
from the chaotic mess the Bush Administration has gotten us into in Iraq.
Unfortunately the “blueprint” is unworkable and unrealistic.....(full
article)
The Lincoln Group: Unethical Weapon of
Mass Deception Since the inception of the Iraq war, and even during the run-up to the invasion, the Bush Administration aimed to control the news about, and from Iraq. Early on, embedded reporters told stories about the toppling of the statue of Saddam and the heroism of individual soldiers as the military quickly seized Baghdad. Over the course of the subsequent three-plus-year occupation, several hundred million dollars have been spent on an assortment of media projects that were specifically designed to sell "good" news about the occupation. Perhaps the most notorious U.S. effort involved a U.S. public relations company that was contracted to pay for positive news stories -- written by U.S. military personnel -- to be placed in Iraqi publications. In late-September, the Pentagon once again turned toward that company, and inked a two-year contract with the Lincoln Group (website), which "put together a unit of 12-18 communicators to support military PR efforts in Iraq and throughout the Middle East from media training to pitching stories and providing content for government-backed news sites," ODwyerspr.com reported....(full article)
David Grossman’s widely publicized speech at the annual memorial rally for Yitzhak Rabin earlier this month has prompted some fine deconstruction of his “words of peace” from critics. Grossman, one of Israel’s foremost writers and a figurehead for its main peace movement, Peace Now, personifies the caring, tortured face of Zionism that so many of the country’s apologists -- in Israel and abroad, trenchant and wavering alike -- desperately want to believe survives, despite the evidence of the Qanas, Beit Hanouns and other massacres committed by the Israeli army against Arab civilians. Grossman makes it possible to believe, for a moment, that the Ariel Sharons and Ehud Olmerts are not the real upholders of Zionism’s legacy, merely a temporary deviation from its true path. In reality, of course, Grossman draws from the same ideological wellspring as Israel’s founders and its greatest warriors. He embodies the same anguished values of Labor Zionism that won Israel international legitimacy just as it was carrying out one of history’s great acts of ethnic cleansing: the expulsion of some 750,000 Palestinians, or 80 percent the native population, from the borders of the newly established Jewish state.....(full article)
November 7, 2006 New York Times news
article about a Human Rights Watch report on domestic violence against
Palestinian women brings welcome attention to human rights
issues. Unfortunately, the same article, viewed in the context of The
New York Times’ reporting on Israel/Palestine over the last six years,
provides a powerful example of typical US mainstream media bias against
Palestinians. Research shows clearly that The New York Times pays
little attention to human rights in Israel/Palestine, downplays the larger
context in which violence against Palestinian women occurs and generally
silences Palestinian women’s voices. By omitting crucial details and
emphasizing certain others, The New York Times, one of the US’ most
respected and powerful media outlets, has turned a valuable piece of human
rights reporting into a tool that can be used to reinforce a Western
agenda that has cynically exploited “saving Muslim women” as an excuse for
dominating and abusing the rights of people from other cultures.....
Blood-Pouring Anti-Nuke Clowns Sent to Prison:
Three men protesting the presence of weapons of mass destruction in North Dakota were sentenced to federal prison terms of over three years and ordered to pay $17,000 in restitution by a federal judge in Bismarck. The three dressed as clowns and went to the Echo-9 launch site of the intercontinental Minuteman III nuclear missile in rural North Dakota in June 2006. They broke the lock off the fence and put up peace banners and posters. One said: "Swords into plowshares - Spears into pruning hooks." They poured some of their own blood on the site, hammered on the nuclear launching facility and waited to be arrested....(full article)
Unless they’ve been living under a rock, smokers know that cigarettes are bad for them and for the people in their homes. But not everyone realizes that cigarettes are harming animals too. Dogs, rats, primates and other animals are forced to inhale smoke and injected with nicotine in experiments funded by the tobacco industry. These experiments should be stopped now. The companies say that they just want to determine how harmful cigarettes are to human health. But we’ve already determined that smoking can be deadly, and as everything we know about lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses has come from human epidemiological and clinical studies -- not from animal experiments -- there must be another reason.....(full article)
This is a reply to
Robert Jensen’s Dissident Voice article of November 14, “Pornographic
Query: Is a DP Inherently Sexist?” . . . Before I sat down to write my
response, I decided to solicit the opinion of a female friend of mine,
with whom I was at one time extremely close. I’ll call her Colleen, though
that is not her real name (she asked that I not mention her name, for
reasons that will become apparent in a moment). Here is how she opened her
e-mail to me, after reading Jensen’s latest article for herself.....
A Skeptic’s View of the Midterm Elections Forget political correctness. As a progressive that did not drink the Democratic Kool-Aid I remain skeptical about what will now happen. To begin with, the revolution has NOT arrived! Bush is still president. The corporate state is safe. The Upper Class has little to fear. Lobbyists will be writing different names on checks. Winning Democrats will entertain more than they will produce historic restorative reforms. Did Republicans deserve to lose? Of course! Was there a set of promised political and policy reforms by the Democrats to justify enthusiastic voting for them? No. Appropriate rejection of Republicans should not be conflated with passionate embrace of Democrats. Those Americans who thought their votes would bring much needed systemic change to our political system lost. They just don't know or admit it yet. As usual, the third-party movement lost, because the two-party duopoly maintained its stranglehold on our political system. Populists and true progressives lost. Who or what was the biggest winner? The short-term and delusional tactic of lesser-evil voting won big.....(full article)
Today the NFL announced plans to form a
second league specifically for Native American reservations. The
commissioner proclaimed at today’s press conference, “Native Americans
have been outraged over the disrespectful use of their heritage. I am
proud to declare in reconciliation we will give the Native Americans their
own league. Team names and symbols will only disrespect non-Native
Americans.” He went on to say, “This gesture goes a long way towards
honoring Native Americans and leveling the playing field.” There are
currently plans to have a new league with 12 teams based at Indian
Reservations. None of these teams will be hosted by a reservation with a
casino. The chief of one reservation with a casino stated, “We would not
want to be a part of this.” A tribal counsel elder from another
reservation said, “While some reservations with sovereignty over their
land have been allowed to open casinos, the rest of our sovereign nations
are denied the freedom to rule ourselves. The United States is a great
land of freedom and it has denied us this freedom. We are allowed football
and we could use this to generate income. Besides, I think a lot of us
would love to paint ourselves and go half naked to something as sacred as
a football game. Cheering our team would help us forget about how bad we
have been treated.”......
That is the deal with Nancy Pelosi and John Conyers’ impeachment paranoia? We finally get a woman and a black man in positions of power and the first thing they want to do is give Bush a Get Out of Jail Free card? Talk about a cold dash of post-election reality. Pelosi made it clear right before the election that as far as she was concerned, impeachment was “off the table” and a recent letter from Conyers reiterates that the Democratic leadership has no plans to defend the Constitution. In Conyers' view, impeachment seems to be some sort of immature act of retribution.....(full article)
If
a national movement calling for the impeachment of the President is
rapidly emerging and the corporate media are not covering it, is there
really a national movement for the impeachment of the President? (full
article)
-- Poetry --
To impeach or not to impeach:
that is the question.
Rumsfeld is gone. Mehlman is gone. Delay is gone. Yet let's not have our progressives' version of a strutting on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier moment. Because mission has not been accomplished. For those who haven't noticed, while we were busy with other concerns, many of our rights and liberties went missing. Moreover, along with them have gone or are going fast: our planet's polar ice caps; accountability of the corporate sector (our nation's true power brokers); as well as, a sense of place, history, and even a cursory understanding, among a large percent of the populace of the US, of the precepts of civilization and of democratic discourse. These circumstances, like the melting of the polar ice caps, have transpired, incrementally, and have been going on for longer than that Reign of Terror in Tiny Town known as the Bush presidency. For example, regarding the increasingly authoritarian terrain we negotiate our way through daily: In American work places, bosses routinely snoop into underlings' personal e-mails and monitor our web-surfing practices. How did it come about that so many Americans have grown to accept such demeaning intrusions into our privacy? (full article)
In his farewell address in 1796, George Washington warned that America must be constantly awake against “the insidious wiles of foreign influence…since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government.” Today, foreign influence, that most baneful foe of our republican government, has its tentacles entrenched in almost all major decision making and policy producing bodies of the U.S. government machine. It does so not secretly, since its self-serving activities are advocated and legitimized by highly positioned parties that reap the benefits that come in the form of financial gain and positions of power.....(full article)
Does modern femininity strike you as schizophrenic? On one side we have the leftover feminists, a dying breed still doggedly insisting to be taken seriously and failing miserably. Their opponents, ladies having come down from their brief taste of freedom brought to you by sexual revolt, are now reclaiming their roots as delicate flowers to be admired and handled gently. This is exemplified by former new woman icon Sara Jessica Parker. Remember those heady days Mrs. Parker and crew assured women everywhere that it was OK to be as brash and vulgar as men, to sleep around and carouse, and to sow those wild oats on Sex and the City? Parker opted out of the revolution and now is a proud stay at home mom. Apparently she was unable to further the feminist agenda via casual sex. I could have told you this along time ago. Casual sex is no revolution. Any woman can throw on hooker heels and stalk their male prey through seedy bars and the wastelands of night life. But come morning, these ladies are still prostrate under ancient mores regarding love, sex, and gender. Once the novelty of anonymous fucking wore off, it was business as usual. Women went back to pining for their uninterested lovers, labeling each other sluts and whore for their indiscretions, and thusly passed on these values to their daughters.....(full article)
The forced resignation of Donald Rumsfeld the day after the midterm elections says as much about the Secretary of Defense as it does about the President of the United States. Almost seven months before the elections, six retired generals, including two who commanded divisions in Iraq, called for Rumsfeld’s resignation. In response, President Bush said that Rumsfeld was “doing a fine job.” Two months before the midterm elections, Josh Bolten, the President’s chief of staff, told the Democratic leadership, who had demanded Rumsfeld’s resignation, “We strongly disagree.” By the President’s direction, he told the opposition party that Rumsfeld “is an honorable and able public servant [who] retains the full confidence of the President.” One week before the midterm elections, President Bush said that Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney “are doing fantastic jobs and I strongly support them.” Lying through his ever-present smirk, he said he planned to keep Rumsfeld until the end of his term; with Cheney, a constitutionally elected politician, he had no choice. The only comment the President hadn’t made the previous few weeks was, “Rummy, you’re doing a heckuva job.”....(full article)
On the surface, the election in Vermont to replace retiring U.S. Sen. Jim Jeffords was a classic battle between capitalists and workers. In one corner loomed the Republican’s forward Richard Tarrant, a multimillionaire and former CEO of the software company IDX. Nicknamed “Richie” Rich, he spent nearly $7 million of his own money to create the illusion of popular support, blanketing the state with obnoxiously large campaign signs. In the other corner thundered Independent Bernard Sanders, known throughout Vermont as simply “Bernie.” Sanders served four terms as mayor of “the People’s Republic of Burlington” during the 1980s, and eight terms after that as Vermont’s lone representative in the House of Representatives. He built a reputation for attacking corporate interests, supporting universal health care and defending union jobs. Sanders knocked out “Richie” Rich, winning the vote by a whopping 2-to-1 margin. Everyone -- from the British newspaper, the Guardian, to Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman -- has heralded the election of the first socialist senator in U.S. history, an independent who will stand up to the two mainstream parties, oppose war, roll back corporate power and lead the fight for workers and the oppressed. While it was fantastic to see Tarrant humiliated, Sanders’ election to the Senate doesn’t represent a radical departure from politics as usual. He may have a portrait of Eugene Debs hanging in his office, but his politics have little in common with that great American socialist....(full article)
There was no shortage of opportunists present as they broke ground the other day for the $100 million Martin Luther King memorial in Washington, DC. Charlatans from Oprah to Hilfiger lined up in the hope a little of Dr. King's integrity might rub off on them. But the most out of place speaker was, of course, President George W. Bush, who told the crowd, "our journey to justice is not complete. There are still people in our society who hurt, neighborhoods that are too poor . . . there's still prejudice that holds citizens back." That whirring noise heard in the background . . . well, you know the rest....(full article)
The antiwar movement is often accused in
mainstream media discourse of lacking any viable peace plan for Iraq.
Ahmed Amr puts the lie to this charge and offers a well thought out
proposal to end the war and occupation, and give the people of Iraq hope
for a brighter future.....(full article)
Pornographic Query: Is a DP Inherently
Sexist? Is the sexual practice in which two men penetrate a woman anally and vaginally at the same time -- a “DP,” or double penetration in the vernacular of the pornography industry -- inherently sexist? When I first got into academic life, I couldn’t have predicted some of the questions that would come my way. But after nearly two decades of writing and speaking about the contemporary pornography industry, not much surprises me. This question was posed to me recently by a man who had read an essay of mine in which I had argued that men’s ability to achieve sexual pleasure by masturbating as they watch DP scenes in pornographic movies was an example of a failure of empathy. Is a DP inherently degrading and therefore sexist, as my essay implied? After corresponding a bit with the man, I realized I had never addressed the question directly in print. He pressed for a simple yes-or-no answer, but it seems more useful to walk through a careful response to the question.....(full article)
Kim Petersen comments on a recent exchange between DV contributing writer Neve Gordon and Jeff Blankfort (a friend of DV's whose work has also been published here) over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.....(full article)
After a decade of conflict and more than 13,000 deaths, Pushpa Kamal Dahal, better known as Chairman Prachanda, leader of the Communist Party of Nepal and commander of arguably the most successful modern-day anti-feudal rebellion, has signaled an apparently abrupt ideological change of course. In an interview with Thomas Bell of the Telegraph, Prachanda declared that he and his party "are not fighting for socialism." Interpreted in the article as a move to the "centre," the statement went conspicuously further. While reiterating his party's opposition to feudalism, the communist leader claimed to be "fighting for a capitalist mode of production," with the aim "to give more profit to the capitalists and industrialists.".....(full article)
As conservative Christian evangelical leaders continue to sift through the ashes of Tuesday's overwhelming electoral defeat, some are playing the blame game, others are already in attack mode, and still others are planning for the next battle. Some leaders are blaming Republican Party corruption for the defeat, while others are again rallying their troops by continuing to hammer away at the "Beware of Nancy Pelosi and her San Francisco values" theme -- a theme that didn't resonate with voters -- as if they preferred that the atmosphere in Washington continued to be poisoned by partisan politics.....(full article)
Democrats are
dancing around the head of Donald Rumsfeld like a scene from Lord of
the Flies, heating up the tar buckets and plucking the goose in eager,
nay, wild anticipation. Personally, I love the smell of tar and
feathers in the morning and am quite willing to march on the White House
as we speak. I like revenge as well as the next guy. But I also consider
myself a compassionate man, one perfectly willing to let Bush's cabinet
choose whether they wanna play the mommy or the daddy in the Big House,
then move on to the real problems, such as the fact that a gallon of Old
Grandad is nearly 50 bucks here in Virginia, or the fact that we are still
a nation of people, half of whom were happy to elect a bunch of war
criminals -- TWICE! -- and still are. Ah, but lo and beshit, the Democrats
have rescued us. If you can call running around like chickens with their
heads up their asses while the Republicans did what they always do -- get
caught stealing the national silverware, while bombing the hell out of
some miserable piece of dirt as a distraction, thereby self-destructing in
12 years as usual, but getting obscenely rich in the process. Pardon my
cynicism, but the view is pretty damned sorry from here in the cheap
seats. From down here it looks like every Yankee liberal north of Virginia
seems convinced they are now shitting in such tall cotton that all they
need do from here on out is foist Hillary Clinton on the many poor
miserable bastards unfortunate enough to be called heartland Democrats
because we don't have the balls to become heavily armed libertarians.
Nominating Hillary might just drive us to it.....
Fundamental, revolutionary, political and social change is clearly needed in the USA and the world. Corporate domination of the economic and political system and mass culture is a huge threat to the possibilities for a decent and sustainable future for humankind and for all forms of life on the earth. King Coal and Big Oil continue to use their power and vast wealth to keep us locked into a reliance on earth-heating fossil fuels that, if not quickly reversed, will lead to a steady escalation of catastrophic climate events and a breakdown of an already-stressed ecosystem. The dominance of the Pentagon and corporate-supporting, militaristic approaches to problems, the immense amounts of money wasted in weapons production, robs the masses of people of badly-needed resources for housing, health care, education and economic development. It also generates armed resistance, including the terrorism of the stateless that, in a nuclear age, is indeed terrifying. And the widening gulf between the ever-richer, tiny ruling elite of the world and the vast majority of the world’s population, almost half of whom try to get by on no more than $2 a day, is an obscenity justifying rebellion on a wide scale. What happened on November 7, Election Day, was not that rebellion. It was not the revolution. But it could be a start, an opening up of prospects for strengthening independent, issue-oriented movement building......(full article)
The BBC websites reporting of the judgment was big, bold and triumphal: “Celebrations hail Saddam verdict in Baghdad's Shia-dominated Sadr City.” (BBC news online, November 5, 2006) The following day, the New York Times website echoed the emphasis: “Quotation Of The Day: ‘This is a very great happiness. I will never forget this day.’ Abdul Razzaq Hassan, a laborer, on the sentencing of Saddam Hussein.” A few lines below, however, a more realistic version of events could be found: “In a Divided Iraq, Reaction to Saddam Death Sentence Conforms to Sectarian Lines -- The guilty verdict was met with carefree celebration in Shiite towns and brooding bitterness in Sunni ones.” (Sabrina Tavernise, New York Times, November 6, 2006) In other words, the response in Iraq was, of course, mixed. But both the BBC and the New York Times chose a focus that presented the verdict as a joyous success for the occupying forces.....(full article)
The significance of the electoral tr | |
