The Bush Administration and their Democratic allies believe that the war in Iraq and now Iran is in Israel’s interest.
“If you're a supporter of Israel, I would strongly urge you to help other countries become democracies,” President Bush was quoted as saying in the Forward on December 16, 2005. “Israel's long-term survival depends upon the spread of democracy in the Middle East.”
Democracy by gunpoint that is.
As the search for Weapons of Mass Destruction has waned, Bush and his warmongering allies continue to declare the occupation of Iraq is about democracy. It was on the backburner of justifications before the war, but now the neocons’ false hopes are front and center. Of course, this so-called “democracy” has clear limitations. For starters, what the Bush administration and their Israeli ally have in mind for the Middle East has absolutely nothing do to with any sort of democratic principles.
On Wednesday January 18, Israeli police detained seven Palestinians in Arab East Jerusalem for next week's Palestinian parliamentary election. The group was accused of belonging to an outlawed group with ties to terrorists in Palestine. Among those captured was the head of Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a group that was allegedly involved in attacks on Israelis over the past five years.
That’s the sort of
equal representation Bush is talking about -- shut out voices that counter
your own agenda and call it democratic. That is the real reason why the
war in Iraq is in the interest of Israel, for the occupiers will never
allow a government to form that opposes Israel’s own brutal occupation of
The Iran warmongering that’s become so popular of late has the exact same basis. If there only was democracy in Tehran, cries the Washington Establishment, Israel could sleep better at night. Or so they want us to believe. But anyone with the slightest knowledge of Iran’s history would know that even a democratic Tehran is not likely to befriend Israel’s policies.
President Bush declared on January 13 that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose “a grave threat to the security of the world,” and in particular, Israel.
This exact same rhetoric was invoked prior to the Iraq invasion. But it’s not the world community that really feels threatened. It’s allegedly Israel. So a war on Iran would be a war for Israel’s security, not necessarily the United States’ -- and certainly an invasion would lead to democratization. Never mind that Israel already harbors a nuclear arsenal and has violated Security Council resolutions.
That’s a non-issue.
Many Democrats have joined in, including Senator John Kerry who has also joined the attack-Iran-save-Israel bandwagon, admitting to reporters last week in India that, “Iran has made a dangerous and silly decision of confronting not just the U.S. government but the entire international community . . . If all diplomatic channels fail, we have no choice but to take the issue before the international body.”
The Security Council isn’t likely to back the US and Israel’s disdain for Iran. China and Russia both have huge economic ties to the country, and that is possibly why Tehran feels so comfortable badmouthing Israel and turning their back on the United States.
So, like the invasion of Iraq, the US and Britain will have to go it alone when they decide to give Iran a chin-check. And that is what this conflict may be about. As we know, it’s not about democracy or liberation. It’s about expanding empire.
Joshua Frank is the author of Left Out!: How Liberals Helped Reelect George W. Bush, just published by Common Courage Press. You can order a copy at a discounted through Josh's radical news blog at: www.brickburner.org. He can be reached at: email@example.com.
Other Recent Articles by Josh Frank