Life as a Cog

The disturbing feeling of Cog-ness is slowly creeping into our nation’s educated citizens. By educated, I do not mean those of us with various alphabet soups behind our gentrified names, but those who have begun to realize this American Dream isn’t what we signed up for. And by Cog-ness, I mean the Machine. Much has been written on our quaint and overly mechanized materialistic system and its class slavery, but there is even more ground to cover. The wheel of the world keeps spinning around its eight-to-six slave driving and passionless axis while the outer rim of the super wealthy continues to be supported by the spokes of hard working American types who never take a day off unless they have to and believe in words like Freedom and Justice while possessing neither. And the wheel of America, in its ever accelerating downward roll, continues to squash any country and every culture that happens to wander into its path. For confirmation, examine the tread marks on flattened Iraq, Sudan, and the like. Or google “factory farming” and look at our wonderful factory farmed meat industry. Real warm and fluffy. Hopeful, you know.

We’ve been told that if we work hard, stay honest, do our best, and floss every day we will have good lives. We’ve been told not to complain, believe in God, and keep our heads down; keep a low profile. We’ve heard this our whole lives. The problem, and what inspires considerable stress related gastrointestinal cramps in The Man, is that the inherited sociocultural beliefs of past generations won’t do anymore. They are no longer relevant. Across the country, people are beginning to pay attention and complain with the best of them. But stay in line, we are told. Corporations weed out possible rebels and free spirits with standardized personality and drug testing and the university realm of academia scoffs at any would be teachers lacking multiple graduate degrees on their resumes. As if jumping through various systematic hoops of academic accomplishment proves one dynamic enough, creative enough, and worthy to educate the up and coming troublemakers of tomorrow. The low wage workers, as researchers such as Barbara Ehrenreich tell us, are told to value hard work and not complain and continue to pull the hard unforgiving yoke on the ground floor of the machinery.

And then there is God. Or rather, the popular Americanized version. The drifting vagrant Christ who said Love each other and Do the Right Thing before adorning some knotty pine seems not to be present. America holds God up as a threat to these low wage worker slaves showing them: See? Jesus had it way worse than you, and he didn’t complain. And often the low wage view is skewed as well. Here in East Tennessee, on UT football nights, God is undoubtedly inundated with countless southern inflected twangy voices begging for the Vols to make those two last yards for the first down. This is distressing, and it seems best if we just left the whole subject out of the quest for personal freedom. Often my students are confused, and we examine beliefs on God much like Serge A. Storms’ in Triggerfish Twist: “I’m not saying God doesn’t exist. I believe in God. But he’s not a micromanager, so stop asking Him to drop the crisis in Rwanda and help you find your wallet.”

However, in my experience as a university lecturer in English and the Humanities and an animal advocate, plenty of students are catching on. They are getting the vague and uneasy feeling that overly reductionist religious systems and outdated social codes are selling a comfy cell block box with all the trimmings in which to live, in which to stay in line. Our jailers are masters of deception, and they use chains with such subtle disguising craftsmanship Hephaestus himself would be proud of them. In our comfy ornate boxes, the jailers give us pretty shackles to wear. Not only do we wear them, but we must go out and purchase them and pay for them with our hard earned money (nah, just charge it). Akin to docking a prisoner for his meals, we pull on the woolly snug chains of comfort in complete ignorance. Ipods, absurdly large and flat television screens on which we watch absurdly large and fake heroes. More clothes than anyone could wear, Hummers, overly aggressive predatory student loans, and more. Oh yes, don’t forget the wholesale slaughter of countless animals who think, live, and acutely feel pain. Sure, I realize many feel these purchases are their right. They earned the money or have the credit, so who am I to say these excesses are wrong? Who says we can’t eat animals? I do. The minute you find yourself plopping down huge percentages of your monthly income for unneeded things, you are wrong. I’ve been there as well, so save your righteous indignation. If you have not examined the reasons behind your desire for things, you need to rethink, or perhaps simply think. And that is why my writing and classes often inspire controversy…I feel no reason to subscribe to a hypocritical system of political correctness in which I do not believe. So I feel I am someone who is right and not hesitant to admit it. It is not ego; it is simply truth.

Ah yes, it is a part of my dilettante palm-tree-methodology and life path to live and let live, so don’t expect me to come fire bomb any Hummer dealerships. Been there, done that, so to speak. If you want to eat the cooked flesh of a tortured animal, that is your choice; it is our choice to live as we chose. That, in fact, is one of the only true values America has to offer us. Therefore, hateful small minded responses do not anger me. Rather, I am quite entertained by them because there always is the possibility that my paradigm could be flawed in some way unbeknown to me. You know, I could be wrong. But, materialism, class division, animal slavery, overly reductionist religious institutions, and ignorance are the problems in this society as I see them and unlike so many millions who have came and gone before me quite unnoticed, I don’t have a big interest in faking sincerity and keeping my head down.

Predatory credit card companies, criminal mortgage lenders, slaughterhouses and factory farms, absurd student loan companies, and well spoken politicians who truly do not care about the plight of commoners are all too vocal and powerful and committed to exploiting the lower classes for outrageous financial gain. So why should people who realize the version of Freedom we have been sold has come at the cost of soulless conformity remain politically correct and silent? Why should the cogs keep evenly greased and silently turning? The squeaks of social unrest, class consciousness, and animal/civil rights are quickly greased by cheap government bureaucrats with six part plans efficiently going nowhere. The truth is the poor are simply minor speed bumps on the road to upper class elitism, a minor annoyance with no real teeth, nothing to damage the SUVs of the Very Well Adjusted and Upwardly Mobile. So go ahead, crush them as you ladder climb because it’s completely your right to do so. Go ahead and destroy them and their hopes, you won’t hardly even think about it; it won’t trouble you at all.

Being a system in which one can rise above one’s situation, achieve a higher level of socioeconomic successs, and then haughtily look down on members of one’s previous socioeconomic class, America may not be as Great as they once told us. The present wealth oriented America system depends on the ignorance and placidity of us cogs to stay silent and take what they can give us. Then, after an adult lifetime of crushing labor, we can get a company watch and know that we never started any trouble and kept to ourselves. Perhaps the tombstones of the current American low wage workforce could have a single inscription above a collective mass grave: Good American. Worked Hard. Never Caused Trouble. Socially Accepted. Historically Irrelevant. Not that their one track activism is always the correct approach, but as those mysterious maskers at A.L.F. and E.L.F. would no doubt tell us, there is talking and there is doing. Until the majority of Americans realize our superimposed socioeconomic slavery and decide to raise complete and holy hell, this article — and all others like it — is the worthless talk of self-important academics. Thanks for reading. I’ll be around.

Mike Jaynes is an independent animal advocate who teaches English and Western Humanities at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. His research interests include Animal Advocacy Ethics, Biocentrism, Greek Mythology, Ufology, the cult of the individual, the embraced rogue, experimental fiction, American fiction, and Tom Robbins. He can be reached at: achillesjaynes@gmail.com. Read other articles by Mike.

27 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. bozhidar balkas said on August 30th, 2008 at 6:31am #

    american plutos are united like never before. i’ve said this before but i will repeat it for new readers: the plutos (let’s say 5mn people) control with iron grip WH, senate, congress, cia, fbi, police, armed services, and money.
    these people control the rest of the pop with sea of lies while the aliens are controled by bombs, occupations, warfare, threats, sanctions, blockades, etc. thank u

  2. akula said on August 30th, 2008 at 11:22am #

    This is an amazing article which gives voice to many of the sentiments I’ve had as of late. A short while ago I attended a family reunion in which we all met for dinner at a long term care facility for the elderly… my grandparents are simply too far along to be able to go anywhere so we came to them. As I walked the halls of the facility, it was striking how everyone was, essentially, the same. All of the patients had lived long lives, worked hard, had been socially accepted and will soon be historically irrelevant.

    Now I do not mean to sound judgemental or insensitive when I say that. No doubt many of them were hell-raisers in their younger days and probably lived more vibrant lives than most today ever will, thanks to the fact that they didn’t have mass-media pumping the same illusory dream into their skulls 24/7.

    For the most part they all fit the standard mold, coming from one of the nearby farming communities, working hard their entire lives, keeping their heads down and not making any waves. All of them married between the age of 18-25, had kids no later than 26 (and that’s the outside envelope of acceptable practices!), invested in retirement funds shortly thereafter because their friend the local banker (who also owned and ran farm supply businesses) told them it was a good thing to do.

    Again, I do not want to come off as being a hypocrit. I’ll probably end up being more of a cog in the machine than they ever were…at least with a farm you’ve got a little piece of land you can mostly do with as you wish, more than most city dwellers could ever dream of…. but when I looked into their faces, I saw the same thing. It was a look that said “I’m tired. Is it over yet?”

    It was an expression that comes from a life of the constant “nose pressed to the grindstone” mentality. Their purpose, as cogs in the societal machine that we have created, had been fulfilled. You could see that some of them had realized this, were none too happy about it but had come to terms with the fact that they had spent a lifetime of labor without ever stepping back to see what was going on. They had now become spare parts sitting in a surplus bin, no longer part of the machine but still in the same building which houses it.

  3. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 30th, 2008 at 11:28am #

    Are we living in a Matrix? And if so, is our perception of the external world illusory? Many people, including philosophers from Descartes to Morpheus, say yes: if we’re in a Matrix, then the ordinary objects that we seem to see don’t exist, and we’re radically deluded. I say no: even if we’re in a Matrix, ordinary objects still exist, and most of our beliefs about the external world are correct. Instead, we can see the Matrix hypothesis as a metaphysical hypothesis about the underlying nature of physics in our world.

  4. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 30th, 2008 at 11:32am #

    HEY U ALL:

    is it true that the Lotto games are fixed and that the people who appear on TV as winning the lotto jackpots are not real winngers but gatekeepers and patsies who work for Lotto mafia cartels?

  5. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 30th, 2008 at 11:48am #

    OK FOLKS WATCH THIS ROCK VIDEO WHICH SUMMARIZES AND EXPLAINS LIFE IN USA. AND READ THE LYRICS WHICH TALK ABOUT LIFE IN PREDETERMINIST, NEOLIBERAL CORPORATIST SOCIETIES LIKE MEXICO, USA, UK, COLOMBIA, JAPAN, ETC.:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCqwZ6-x-Wk

    “Subdivisions”

    Sprawling on the fringes of the city
    In geometric order
    An insulated border
    In between the bright lights
    And the far unlit unknown

    Growing up it all seems so one-sided
    Opinions all provided
    The future pre-decided
    Detached and subdivided
    In the mass production zone
    Nowhere is the dreamer or the misfit so alone

    (Subdivisions)
    In the high school halls
    In the shopping malls
    Conform or be cast out
    (Subdivisions)
    In the basement bars
    In the backs of cars
    Be cool or be cast out
    Any escape might help to smooth the unattractive truth
    But the suburbs have no charms to soothe the restless dreams of youth

    Drawn like moths we drift into the city
    The timeless old attraction
    Cruising for the action
    Lit up like a firefly
    Just to feel the living night

    Some will sell their dreams for small desires
    Or lose the race to rats
    Get caught in ticking traps
    And start to dream of somewhere
    To relax their restless flight
    Somewhere out of a memory of lighted streets on quiet nights…

  6. Brian Koontz said on August 30th, 2008 at 3:44pm #

    There are no low wage (legal) jobs in America, since all Americans receive vast imperial benefits. “Poor” Americans aren’t silent because they are deluded, ignorant, or coerced, they are silent because they are complicit in those very imperial benefits that ensure they are not poor.

    “Poor” Americans don’t believe in justice, not because they are ignorant but because they know that if justice in the world truly existed, they would no longer be protected by an imperialist state.

    The breakdown of protection of the American state toward it’s poor will lead to a rise in “compassion” of the American poor for their imperial victims. Only when the American poor join the same pool of victims will they care for them.

    Your concept of “raising holy hell” is the concept of a transfer of wealth from the Mob Boss to the Mob Underlings. That’s what the left means when they deride the “inequality gap” in America. But it’s not the inequality gap in AMERICA that matters - it’s the inequality gap between America and the people America exploits - it’s the inequality gap between the global haves and the global have-nots. It’s the Haitian eating mud cakes and the African starving to death that needs to be addressed (first), not a “poor” American “raising holy hell” to get a few more handouts (for himself, never for the Haitian of course) from the Mob Boss.

    “Poor” Americans are middle-class with respect to the global population. Most of the left refuses to acknowledge this. Until they do and come to understand what it means, they are not living in reality.

    The biggest victims of the American state in America are not the “proletariat” but what’s left of the indigenous population. They are the only people in America who are treated with any similarity to how the American state treats most of the world.

    The American poor are exploited, absolutely. But their exploitation means they can’t buy an Ipod, or take regular vacations. For much of the world exploitation by the American state means they are under constant threat of starvation.

    The cure is bottom-up - let’s deal with the biggest victims first, and work our way up.

  7. David said on August 30th, 2008 at 5:27pm #

    Mike:

    It’s fear. All fear. The serfs shook with it every time the baron of the land rode by their mud and thatch hovels hoping that he wasn’t looking for them.

    Is there really any difference in the worker’s gut reaction between the 12th century baron and the CEO who struts through the assembly line as far as the end result? That horse, that sword, that armor, that hand-tailored suit from Milan, that Bentley and chauffer?

    Fix the fear, change the world!

  8. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 30th, 2008 at 5:59pm #

    Capitalism kills, let’s kill capitalism !! We need a big united socialist party for that. Politics is still the only vehicle to solve our problems, there is no other way

  9. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 30th, 2008 at 6:01pm #

    Communism can only be achieved
    through proletarian revolution

    http://rwor.org/Constitution/constitution.html

    People today are told to “be realistic”: to confine their aims to getting governments to reform, and to “realize the true ideals of democracy.”

    THIS CAN’T WORK! Putting your hopes and efforts into that can only make things worse. Such a course is, in fact, not “realistic”; it is a dead end.

    Why? Bob Avakian, the founding Chair of the RCP, has put it this way: “In a world marked by profound class divisions and social inequality, to talk about ‘democracy’—without talking about the class nature of that democracy and which class it serves—is meaningless, and worse. So long as society is divided into classes, there can be no ‘democracy for all’; one class or another will rule, and it will uphold and promote that kind of democracy which serves its interests and goals. The question is: which class will rule and whether its rule, and its system of democracy, will serve the continuation, or the eventual abolition, of class divisions and the corresponding relations of exploitation, oppression and inequality.”

    The monstrous armies and brutal police forces at the core of today’s state were built up over centuries to protect and serve the interests and goals of the class of capitalist-imperialists. This class alone determines when, how and against whom the army and police will be used, and to what ends. Their monopoly on “legitimate force” reveals American democracy (like all democracies) to be, in essence, a dictatorship of one class over another—in this case, a dictatorship of the imperialists. And the whole history of this country—from the genocidal dispossession of the Native American Indians to the scores of wars and military actions this country has fought…from the horrendous founding crime of slavery to the violent repression directed against every radical movement that has arisen in this country to fight for a better world—has proven this point over and over again.

    The revolution would have to overthrow the state machinery of these capitalist-imperialists and bring into being a new state power that serves the revolutionary interests of the formerly exploited class, the proletariat, in emancipating all of humanity—in moving society, and the world, toward the abolition of class divisions and oppressive and exploitative relations as a whole. This revolutionary state would be the dictatorship of the proletariat—a state that would be radically different from all previous forms of states.

    All previous states have served the extension and defense of relations of exploitation; they have enforced the domination of exploiting classes, and have fortified themselves against any fundamental changes in these relations. The dictatorship of the proletariat, by contrast, aims at the eventual abolition of the state itself, with the abolition of class distinctions and of all antagonistic social relations leading to exploitation, oppression, and the constant regeneration of destructive conflicts among people. And, in order to continue advancing toward that objective, the dictatorship of the proletariat must increasingly draw the masses of people, from many different sections of society, into meaningful involvement in the process of running society and carrying forward the advance toward the ultimate goal of communism throughout the world. This process will be characterized by people thinking and acting in diverse and creative ways…it will be full of ferment and dissent and debate, over both the character of society and its course at any given time…with leadership being exercised to both unleash this and, in an overall sense, to guide this toward the ultimate goal of communism. This state corresponds to, and will be necessary throughout, socialist society; but socialism is not an end in itself—it is the critical and necessary transition aiming for the final goal of a communist world—and the socialist state must continually undergo radical transformations that are in line with, and serve, the advance toward that final goal, which will involve the eventual elimination of the division between the state and the rest of society and the abolition of the state itself, with the abolition of class divisions and oppressive relations among people, throughout the world.

    This socialist state would lead and support people in making radical transformations in every sphere of society. It would construct a socialist economic system, by first taking over the major means of production (factories, land and mines, machinery and other technology, etc.) that have been owned and controlled by the big capitalists as their private property—converting these into socialist state property and utilizing them to meet the needs of the people, while rendering support to revolutionary struggle throughout the world. The socialist state would play a decisive role in moving society, through various waves and stages of multi-faceted struggle and social transformations, toward the communist vision of ensuring a common abundance for the people as a whole and overcoming the age-old division between those who work with their minds and those who work with their hands (between mental and physical labor), as well as all other oppressive divisions among people. It would act to prevent the return of the former exploiters, and resist the attacks of imperialism. It would make possible a different kind of democracy, on a far greater scale and with a much more radical vision and practice of human freedom than anything today, in line with its final goal—a final goal in which democracy itself, as a form of state, is transcended and people together debate and decide the course of things without resort to any kind of apparatus of violent suppression. Finally, this new revolutionary socialist state would be built as a “base area” for the world revolution—a springboard and support base and beacon for revolutionary struggles in other countries, all working together to get to a world without exploitation and oppression.

  10. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 30th, 2008 at 6:14pm #

    Brian Koontz: Americans recieve benefits if you are a conformist american. But most american workers can only eat and drive a car in America. But american workers cannot go to a university for example to study law, political science or philosophy, or cannot go to an endocrinologist doctor if they want to lose weight, because doctors are so expensive in America. So it is evident that the majority of americans are not well and *don’t* receive benefits at all. The only folks who are benefiting from Imperialist USA is Jennifer Lopez, Tom Cruise, the yuppie middle libertarian right wing bourgoeise elitist classes, but the majority of american employees and workers are not doing well at all. That’s why there is a need of socialism in USA so that wealth could trickle down to the masses

  11. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 30th, 2008 at 6:20pm #

    bob avakian has an MP3 related to why many americans cannot be part of a Socialist Revolution to overthrow the capitalist system because many many americans, you can say the majority of american citizens live a materialist, life of sex, drugs and rock and roll american way of life, and giving that up is too hard to choose a revolution

    How can this be a popular revolution when so much is lined up against it … are you nuts?: 35 minutes / 23.9 meg (mp3)
    http://bobavakian.net/sound/slate/popular_revolution_are_you_nuts.mp3

    .

  12. MT Suit said on August 31st, 2008 at 12:52am #

    Hey! Dig the thoughtful comments. Great essay too! You guys and gals are the best.

  13. Brian Koontz said on August 31st, 2008 at 11:10am #

    In reply to Tennessee-Socialist:

    “Brian Koontz: Americans recieve benefits if you are a conformist american. But most american workers can only eat and drive a car in America. But american workers cannot go to a university for example to study law, political science or philosophy, or cannot go to an endocrinologist doctor if they want to lose weight, because doctors are so expensive in America. So it is evident that the majority of americans are not well and *don’t* receive benefits at all.”

    Education and healing should be universal rights, but there’s a massive difference between the welfare of “poor” Americans and the welfare of the global poor.

    Take one huge difference - the minimum wage. Regardless of gender or race at least, most Americans can get a low-paying job. It’s not too difficult once American citizenship is attained for anyone to be a “poor” American. The federal minimum wage is currently $6.55 per hour and will be going up to $7.25 per hour next summer. The concept of a “living” wage in America* is sheer nonsense and political opportunism - it’s easy to live on the minimum wage in America.

    According to even the World Bank (not exactly an unbiased organization), in 2001 1.1 billion people “lived” on less than $1 a day, and 2.7 billion “lived” on less than $2 a day. In other words, nearly half the global population makes less than a third in an entire day what a “poor” American makes in an hour. This was *before* the Bush Administration took it’s toll on the world.

    The minimum wage in America is an *imperial* benefit. It resulted not (just) from “democratic movement”, as Chomsky claims, but from imperial theft and redistribution of that theft. The redistribution from Mob Boss to Mob Underling is what Chomsky calls “democracy”. Third-worlders perhaps have another name for it.

    Life for a poor American is not peaches and cream. But at least a poor American knows what peaches and cream *are*.

    “The only folks who are benefiting from Imperialist USA is Jennifer Lopez, Tom Cruise, the yuppie middle libertarian right wing bourgoeise elitist classes, but the majority of american employees and workers are not doing well at all. That’s why there is a need of socialism in USA so that wealth could trickle down to the masses”

    The American poor are *not* the masses! The masses are the GLOBAL poor, the truly poor, those 1.1 billion “living” in sheer desperation and the 2.7 billion “living” in dire straits and the other billion+ mildly less exploited. The American poor are the Mob Underlings, exploited for sure but with a highly privileged and highly exploitive place in the global system.

    A problem with Americans is that they always compare themselves to other (richer) Americans. Your examples of Tom Cruise and Jennifer Lopez are tragically typical. The American poor consume American media that shows opulence and the “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” and cry out “exploitation!” For the Mob Underling to compare himself to the Mob Boss and ignore the victims of the mob, the *true* victims, is to be blind and to not live in reality.

    The American left is hardly less racist and monstrous than the right, but they have 1000 times the self-righteousness. They are the ones who “know about” Imperialism without actually knowing about it.

    Don’t you think that one point of American media showing the “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” is so that poor Americans will focus on that instead of on attaining solidarity with the global poor? Don’t you think that you yourself have fallen into a capitalist trap, Mr. Socialist?

    “Socialism in the USA” is nothing more than the Mob Underling trying to get more imperial benefits from the Mob Boss.

    * I support a “living wage” in America as well as all other transfers from the Mob Boss to the Mob Underling only insofar as they do not distract the American left away from solutions to the world’s problems. It seems for most of the Imperial left that being distracted by those transfers is the point of their existence.

  14. Tennessee-Socialist said on August 31st, 2008 at 12:19pm #

    Brian: it seems to me that you are conformist citizen. You are labeling the so called minimum wage of 6 dollars an hour as a paradise. First of all most american poors are unemployed and provided that they are unemployed they dont get 40 hrs a week salary, less than 40 hrs a week which times 6 dollars is a misery.

    In a country where every thing is privatized, the poors of Cuba are a lot better than the poors of USA

    I don’t know about you, but I, myself i’m beating the bullets in USA. If i wasn’t poor and living in a hell, i wouldn’t be a socialist, i would probably be a libertarian, democrat or republican.

    But i am socialist, because socialism is the only system that can truely trickle down the GDP created in a country to the masses.

    Life is a complete hell in USA for the majority, even if you earn 6 dollars an hour.

    You are saying that USA is a high salary nation, hahaha. It’s a high salary country if you are a CEO or a rich doctor like i said, but most workers in America earn a lot less than the workers of Spain, UK, Germany and many other countries.

    I don’t know but i think that life is a true hell for the majority and that the only people doing well in America are people who earn more than 50,000 a year (1 thousand a week). And i don’t think that most US workers earn 1000 a week)

    Just find out how much US workers earn, which is a misery compared to developed countries

    By the way don’t compare USA with Haiti. That’s like comparing Mike Tyson with a light-weight boxer

    .

  15. Israel Did 9-11 said on August 31st, 2008 at 12:21pm #

    THIS IS SOME BASIC TENETS OF THE PROJECT CAMELOT, AN ILLUMINATI ZIONIST ORDER PLOT FOR GLOBAL DICTATORSHIP

    The Internet is going to be restructured, and the format and infrastructure is already in place, with the monitoring systems in place as well. Any dissident activities will be corrupted, and eliminated. All I will say about the “seeming” hierarchy changes is that such changes are to expedite (not necessarily change or reverse) the numerous transitions into a more controlled state. There is only one controlling team, and we are not on the team..

    THE AGENDA schedule is as planned on target, and all events are transpiring as planned. There are no mistakes or accidents, or miscalculations. Hard to believe, but you must understand the network involved that knows not only what the right and left hands are doing, but in fact instructs them to perform in their functions… all performed to “persuade and manage”

    the majority into believing that what is happening is right and the best for all involved. Watch… you will see more each day, in some cases, changes by the hour prevail as October approaches. The October event(s) will be the coup d’état of human life as we have known it in this century.

    .

  16. Most Americans are suffering said on August 31st, 2008 at 12:39pm #

    My friend, life is real hard in USA. I bet that the workers and poors of Chile, Venezuela, Spain, France and other countries are a lot better mentally, spiritually and physically than the workers and poors of USA. USA is a hardcore capitalist privatized individualist libertarian system. Which means a hardcore system in which relationships are also *bought and sold*. The free market system of USA is so marketized and privatized that even wives are bought. There is no love, passion and emotions in this system, only money $$$ can buy you a wife, relationships and love in America. This is not so in Venezuela, Cuba, Chile, Spain, Europe, Asia etc. where relationships and spiritual wellbeing doesn’t require for you to have a sports car and money.

  17. bozhidar balkas said on August 31st, 2008 at 1:50pm #

    brian,
    i’m not sure that the comparison in earnings betwn US minimum earners with world poor living on 1$ a day is accurate/adequate.
    in poor countries children may pick berries; gather mushrooms; have no toys and gadgets, etc.
    parents may cook own meals with little or no meat. air and water or even food may be cleaner.
    a cup of beans costing 50c may feed the familyof four for a day.
    in any case, your statement is overgeneralized.

  18. AJ Nasreddin said on September 1st, 2008 at 4:46am #

    Brian, you ought to consider the cost of living for different countries. If you look closely, you’ll find that those earning $1 or $2 a day live a similar miserable life as an American earning $6 an hour. Maybe the difference is in complexity.

    For example in America, if you don’t have a car, you’re generally screwed. No transportation, no work. So ok, maybe the poor dude in America has a car and thus you would argue has more wealth. Really, it’s more of a burden. Someone earning minimum wage cannot afford a new car, however cheap – especially if he or she has a family. Old cars need a lot of money to keep them running. Then by law, you need insurance for that old clunker – more money down the tubes. Of course, you work to fuel your car which also means more money gone.

    Maybe if there were American wages with third world lifestyle, all Americans would be rich. This is the miscalculation many immigrants make when they move – the miscalculation of the cost of living.

    When I was a single student at university, I used to spend about $800 a month on expenses (oil was $30 a barrel). Now, in a “developing” country, my family of four needs a minimum of $600 a month to cover our expenses. Nowadays, could an American family of four live on $20 a day? That’s only four hours of work.

    I had to leave America to escape the Machine. Nice to see people are recognizing it for what it is, but admitting that there is a problem is only the first step.

  19. Brian Koontz said on September 1st, 2008 at 10:16am #

    Tennessee-Socialist - the unemployment rate in the United States is very low relative to the unemployment rate in dominated countries (imperial victims). Obviously for those “poor” Americans who are unemployed for long there are additional hardships, and considering that those Americans consume American media constantly displaying opulence many of those Americans turn to crime to support a material lifestyle. Most Americans have no idea what the “third-world” is really like. The United States may be a hell-hole in some respects, but the material position of it’s poor is not one of them. For some of the third-world (especially the places the American state turns it greedy eye to, like Haiti) a hell-hole is defined as a place of (perpetually) terrible war, starvation, and (untreated) disease, none of which occurs in much frequency in the United States to *anyone*. Some argue that the United States is *getting there*, but it’s not there yet.

    National socialism (what you are proposing) no longer “trickles down GDP”. Those days are gone forever. The reason is capital flight in the age of globalization - if a national socialist system was implemented in the US the massive capital that you are counting on to “trickle down” would *get the hell out of Dodge*. They would simply leave the country - the United States is no longer a special economy and it’s capitalists treat it as just another market. National socialism would destroy the American economy not because it’s not a good system but because multinational capitalists (Americans and many, many others) have the country by the balls.

    That is why, in addition to moral and (additional) practical reasons, only Global socialism works in today’s world. Global socialism means capital has no place to run, no place to hide, since they haven’t colonized outer space. Socialism must exist *everywhere* if it is to exist anywhere. Objections like “Cuba!” and “Venezuela!” don’t apply because they are not socialist systems (socialism is a classless society) and also, Cuba is not a healthy society as it is under constant terror and repression by multinational capitalism.

    As a side note, all degrees of socialism *increase* GDP (when there is no capital flight), so your concept of “trickle down GDP” is an insult to the very system you propose.

    TS: “You are saying that USA is a high salary nation, hahaha. It’s a high salary country if you are a CEO or a rich doctor like i said, but most workers in America earn a lot less than the workers of Spain, UK, Germany and many other countries.”

    Again with the comparisons to wealth - all of those countries you refer to are Imperialist countries as well - Spain and the UK were massive empires at one time and remain completely tied to the dominative global system. Are you really saying you want the United States to be more like them?

    Most Americans are suffering writes: “My friend, life is real hard in USA. I bet that the workers and poors of Chile, Venezuela, Spain, France and other countries are a lot better mentally, spiritually and physically than the workers and poors of USA. USA is a hardcore capitalist privatized individualist libertarian system. Which means a hardcore system in which relationships are also *bought and sold*. The free market system of USA is so marketized and privatized that even wives are bought. There is no love, passion and emotions in this system, only money $$$ can buy you a wife, relationships and love in America. This is not so in Venezuela, Cuba, Chile, Spain, Europe, Asia etc. where relationships and spiritual wellbeing doesn’t require for you to have a sports car and money.”

    I agree and disagree. All Imperial societies, including those in Western Europe, feature (many) women who require men to have substantial wealth for them to mate with. This is a feature of any wealthy capitalist society. It’s clearly true that love is relative - so a poor American male may be shunned by American women and have his potential pool of mates greatly decreased relative to the prospects for a poor Haitian male, since there are very few rich Haitian males for Haitian females to mate with.

    I disagree with your romantic outlook on love, however. Love is ultimately always bought and sold, even in non-capitalist societies. For some of the indigenous Americans, for example, one requirement for love is for the man to be a successful hunter, and present his love interest with one of his kills. Love always has a material basis, despite the presence of other aspects and factors, and that material must be controlled so as to be effectively used in the relationship. Lack of control, lack of effective use, and lack of quantity of material are negatives for women of all societies as far as I am aware.

    AJ Nasreddin writes: “Brian, you ought to consider the cost of living for different countries. If you look closely, you’ll find that those earning $1 or $2 a day live a similar miserable life as an American earning $6 an hour. Maybe the difference is in complexity.

    For example in America, if you don’t have a car, you’re generally screwed. No transportation, no work. So ok, maybe the poor dude in America has a car and thus you would argue has more wealth. Really, it’s more of a burden. Someone earning minimum wage cannot afford a new car, however cheap – especially if he or she has a family. Old cars need a lot of money to keep them running. Then by law, you need insurance for that old clunker – more money down the tubes. Of course, you work to fuel your car which also means more money gone.”

    Those are good points but they aren’t enough. For example, not having a car doesn’t mean one can’t work, it just means one is more limited in their employment. In urban or semi-urban environments public transport is often available (yes, America sucks here relative to most other developed countries).

    It’s possible to live in America on $2 a day. Brad Will for example had minimal expenses (those were mostly related to travel which he could have foregone if he had to), and the homeless in general have very low expenses. Obviously many of these people are shunned by their society (and lead otherwise bad lives) in a way that a $2 a day global worker is not.

    Most Americans can’t *conceive* of trying to live on $2 a day, but that doesn’t mean they can’t actually do it. But I agree that it’s much worse to be an American living on $2 a day than being in many other places living on $2 a day. The reason, ironically, is capitalism. For an American to be living on $2 a day means he is outside the capitalist system and therefore unsupported by that system. But for much of the world, living on $2 a day IS the capitalist system, and thus the system and the societies it creates need to perpetuate themselves and thus need to provide some supportive structures for the people, in the same sense that 18th and 19th century plantation owners had some supportive structures for their slaves.

    bozhidar balkas writes: “i’m not sure that the comparison in earnings betwn US minimum earners with world poor living on 1$ a day is accurate/adequate.
    in poor countries children may pick berries; gather mushrooms; have no toys and gadgets, etc.
    parents may cook own meals with little or no meat. air and water or even food may be cleaner.
    a cup of beans costing 50c may feed the familyof four for a day.”

    Americans can do all of those things - they don’t because they don’t have to - they live in a wealthy society.

    Are you honestly saying that American children cannot live without “toys and gadgets”? Well, you sure sound like an American! ;)

  20. bozhidar balkas said on September 1st, 2008 at 11:34am #

    brian,
    not me; i don’t think children cannot be happy/serene/gentle, etc. w.o. gadgets, toys, etc.
    were u asking me or telling me something? i think you were asking?
    thanx

  21. bozhidar balkas said on September 1st, 2008 at 11:38am #

    i do not relish telling you that you read poorly; jump to conclusions; and that you don’t know how to talk to people or in constant pain of some kind. thank u

  22. akula said on September 1st, 2008 at 2:02pm #

    Brian Koontz-

    I am curious why you’ve launched into a war against the poor, stating that America’s poor are essentially spoiled as far as poor people go in comparison to other countries. This may be true in some regards, but at the end of the day it’s splitting hairs. Access to gadgets changes nothing. In fact, cell-phones and I-pods have done more to destroy rich culture and heritage in developing countries far more than starvation. Overall, yes, the poor in America are better off in some regards than those living in other countries. But what is your point exactly? I would counter that the poor in America are a product of the system, but are not the root of the problem or the solution. It’s the machine that we’ve built that is so damaging!

    Let’s look at some of your comments in your original reply-

    “all Americans receive vast imperial benefits. “Poor” Americans aren’t silent because they are deluded, ignorant, or coerced, they are silent because they are complicit in those very imperial benefits that ensure they are not poor.

    “Poor” Americans don’t believe in justice, not because they are ignorant but because they know that if justice in the world truly existed, they would no longer be protected by an imperialist state.”

    FYI, poor Americans are silent because they’ve been raised in an environment that since birth has been telling them

    A) you live in the best country in the world that is uniquely superior to all others

    B) Happiness is attained by getting lots of stuff

    C) Pray to the almighty that he doesn’t smite us and keeps the big macs flowing until the day of the rapture, when all us good christians will go zipping up in the sky off to heaven so fast that it rips the clothes right off our bodies!

    Poor Americans are some of the nicest, hardest working people you’ll ever meet. Unfortunately, for many of them patriotic music and politics are seen as the same thing. Most of these folks are essentially fodder for the system, mere fuel that is heaped onto the burners at the lowest level. As soon as they stop being economically viable ….whether that be as a profit center for a privately run jail, working several minimum wage jobs or being indebted for the rest of their life as they try to make payments on the trailer they will never own… they become refuse, spare parts for scrap.

    That these folks happen to live in a society in which some of the imperial largesse is ever present (that being in the form of cheap consumer junk, high calorie foods that cause previously unheard of rates of obesity and diabetes) is undeniable. But it in no way makes them better off or complicit in the crimes of the empire!

    This is an entire underclass of people who have had the boot on their neck their entire lives. Working three jobs just to try and make ends meet, while essentially they are debt-slaves.

    As far as the “complicity” you insinuate America’s poor are involved in because they know they’re getting kickbacks from America’s imperial exploits, that simply isn’t true.

    These people have no clue about the coups in Indonesia, Chile, Iran and many other countries that we caused, in which we placed dictators in power who caused the deaths of millions while allowing Ford and Chevron free reign economically.

    These people have no inkling that there even is an American Empire

  23. Most Americans are suffering said on September 1st, 2008 at 7:16pm #

    the workers and poors of Chile, Venezuela, Spain, France and other countries are a lot better mentally, spiritually and physically than the workers and poors of USA

  24. Most Americans are suffering said on September 1st, 2008 at 7:18pm #

    Brian: Europe is no longer an Empire, they are not waging wars nor stealing oil from other countries like USA is. USA is the only global and real terrorist threat in this world. I don’t know any other nation that is doing so much harm to the world like USA is. We gotta get rid of US Israeli-Fascism so that the world can be a good place to live

  25. Most Americans are suffering said on September 1st, 2008 at 7:23pm #

    Brian Koontz: The poors of Venezuela and Cuba are wealthier than the poors of USA. The poors of Venezuela and Cuba have access to health and University and College education.

    What poor in USA can have access to good health and good college education?

    Owning a car means shit, owning a car doesn’t make you a lawyer, a doctor and can’t cure diabetes and a tooth decay

    .

  26. Most Americans are suffering said on September 1st, 2008 at 7:38pm #

    USA is the worst country of this world to live in, if you are not rich. USA is a failed state, society and way of life. This country has 2 options: either a radical divorce and revolution from the old consumerist, greedy lifestyle and system or self destruction and balcanization into 3-5 different independent nation states

  27. Brian Koontz said on September 2nd, 2008 at 11:40am #

    In reply to akula:

    “I am curious why you’ve launched into a war against the poor, stating that America’s poor are essentially spoiled as far as poor people go in comparison to other countries. This may be true in some regards, but at the end of the day it’s splitting hairs. Access to gadgets changes nothing. In fact, cell-phones and I-pods have done more to destroy rich culture and heritage in developing countries far more than starvation. Overall, yes, the poor in America are better off in some regards than those living in other countries. But what is your point exactly? I would counter that the poor in America are a product of the system, but are not the root of the problem or the solution. It’s the machine that we’ve built that is so damaging!”

    A Haitian poor eating mud cakes versus an American poor eating meat is not “splitting hairs”. Feel free to converse with said Haitian if you disagree with that.

    There are many points related to there being no class of poor people in America, and very few individual poor people. One is that because there is no poor class in America, there is no revolutionary movement in America - no serious movement to end the system. Unlike in Venezuela or Haiti or many other countries, the “poor” of America are complicit in Imperialism, complicit in maintaining the current system because of their privileged place in that system relative to the majority of the world’s populace. There will be no revolutionary movement in America until the American “poor” become truly poor.

    Another is that the ignorance of the left concerning the “poor” of America destroys any chance the left has of attaining political power. Power is based on understanding reality. However, the American left itself is imperialist, complicit, and does not WANT to attain political power. It’s always tragic to hear about the left deriding their “failures”, without seeming to realize that they don’t want to succeed. They are getting just what they want. They get to moralize and profess that they don’t like something without actually doing anything to stop it - just what the left has excelled at for decades in America.

    Take a look at the “civil rights” movement in the 1960s, supposedly standing for “justice”. The mainstream of that movement, excluding the last year of MLK and Malcolm X and to some extent the Black Panthers and related forces, was about a transfer of wealth (and power) from the rich Americans to the “poor” Americans. It simply did not address Imperialism, precisely because it was complicit in that Imperialism. As Chomsky himself notes, there was no serious opposition to the Vietnam War until a large section of the elite decided the war was too costly. Millions of dead Vietnamese and an utterly devastated country DOESN’T MATTER to the American left. It’s difficult to draw any other conclusion to such a thing than to say the American left is complicit in imperialism.

    Justice, properly spoken, is global socialism. This is the conclusion that MLK and Malcolm X were arriving at shortly before they were murdered, and it’s what will bring an end to the monstrous system that devastates so many of us, and may even make bozhidar balkas happy since it will mean I’m no longer in “constant pain” ;).

    Take a look at a successful capitalist strategy. Their strategy, since the “civil rights movement”, is white pathos. They go on and on about how terrible it was that whites enslaved African blacks. American blacks have fully embraced this strategy, continuing to portray themselves as terrible victims.

    In every hierarchy there are innumerable points. American blacks are privileged in the *global* system. They indeed were and continue to be victims, but in ignoring those below them on the hierarchy they are consigning them to a fate far more terrible than their own. Simply compare the fate of American blacks to that of African blacks to see the difference in privilege.

    Meanwhile, African blacks themselves have no voice. They have no white-supported strategy to complain and complain and complain about how they are treated. They are utterly ignored by the global community. If this community believed in justice it would give voice to and *understanding to* the victims of imperialism. It would not join a white capitalist strategy to fuel the feelings of victimization in American blacks in order to prevent them from gaining solidarity with the global poor, including, even more tragically, their own flesh and blood.

    Also tragically, take a look at “Invisible Man” by Ralph Waldo Ellison. This book, about the “invisibility” of American blacks, was immediately embraced by whites, but that clearly didn’t signal a problem to American blacks (because of their shared complicity in imperialism). It was embraced by whites because it didn’t threaten their agenda, since their (primary) victims, at least in the 1950s, were the “global black”, who was and still is TRULY invisible, not the American black, who a blind Mr. Ellison claimed was.

    The capitalist system needs to be destroyed. If you’re not living in reality you’ll be easily dominated by the system and will be useless in destroying it.

Add to the discussion