<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kucinich to Introduce New Article of Impeachment Against Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: evie</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24776</link>
		<dc:creator>evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24776</guid>
		<description>boz,
You rascal you.  My hubby thinks I'm still a 10, but probably b/c I fog up his glasses and ply him with brandy after I dim the lights.

Haha - 39? My oldest son is 38. But I still feel like I'm 39 - never let the mind get old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boz,<br />
You rascal you.  My hubby thinks I&#8217;m still a 10, but probably b/c I fog up his glasses and ply him with brandy after I dim the lights.</p>
<p>Haha - 39? My oldest son is 38. But I still feel like I&#8217;m 39 - never let the mind get old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24677</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24677</guid>
		<description>evie, 
my wife was  a TEN. now that she's 77 she's still  a NINE. so she lost just 1 POINT in 60 yrs.  that's good news. but i have even better news for u. i like to give people good news first  and after that  even better news.
the better news being that at that rate isabella will have been in 20 yrs' time still an EIGHT AND  ONE  HALF .  
how ab u?  the way u write i think u'r still a NINE  AND  ONE HALF.
and probably 39!?  which means i'm not buying u. thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>evie,<br />
my wife was  a TEN. now that she&#8217;s 77 she&#8217;s still  a NINE. so she lost just 1 POINT in 60 yrs.  that&#8217;s good news. but i have even better news for u. i like to give people good news first  and after that  even better news.<br />
the better news being that at that rate isabella will have been in 20 yrs&#8217; time still an EIGHT AND  ONE  HALF .<br />
how ab u?  the way u write i think u&#8217;r still a NINE  AND  ONE HALF.<br />
and probably 39!?  which means i&#8217;m not buying u. thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evie</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24664</link>
		<dc:creator>evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24664</guid>
		<description>Chuckle, grin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuckle, grin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24523</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24523</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Hue.  Why don't you send an email to Sunil and Kim telling them you would like to read a "Lloyd Rowsey article today."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Hue.  Why don&#8217;t you send an email to Sunil and Kim telling them you would like to read a &#8220;Lloyd Rowsey article today.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24421</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24421</guid>
		<description>All right, Sunil.  A post by Bozidhar B. appeared subsequent to several of my failed attempts and before several of my failed attempts.  And now you tell me you DO exercise posting controls based on content.  

Possibly BB was more patient than I was.  On the other hand, I tried about four "tricks" I have learned to use to shorten wait periods and none of them worked, over a period of about two hours.

But all right, Sunil.  You have the power.  I have to trust you.  Or at least I trust you to allow me to post as long as in your judgement my postings, net, promote Dissident Voice's objectives. 

Now let me ask you, Sunil.  When you or Kim saw my "Fuck You" comment (repeated above), why didn't you no-post it and contact me by email?  With the very information you so publicly posted above?  Do you think I enjoy being reprimanded like a child, in public?  

You don't deny that you and Kim have my email, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right, Sunil.  A post by Bozidhar B. appeared subsequent to several of my failed attempts and before several of my failed attempts.  And now you tell me you DO exercise posting controls based on content.  </p>
<p>Possibly BB was more patient than I was.  On the other hand, I tried about four &#8220;tricks&#8221; I have learned to use to shorten wait periods and none of them worked, over a period of about two hours.</p>
<p>But all right, Sunil.  You have the power.  I have to trust you.  Or at least I trust you to allow me to post as long as in your judgement my postings, net, promote Dissident Voice&#8217;s objectives. </p>
<p>Now let me ask you, Sunil.  When you or Kim saw my &#8220;Fuck You&#8221; comment (repeated above), why didn&#8217;t you no-post it and contact me by email?  With the very information you so publicly posted above?  Do you think I enjoy being reprimanded like a child, in public?  </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t deny that you and Kim have my email, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Longer</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24397</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Longer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24397</guid>
		<description>I'd rather read the Lloyd Rowsey article today than the Lloyd Rowsey Manifesto tomorrow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather read the Lloyd Rowsey article today than the Lloyd Rowsey Manifesto tomorrow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24369</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 04:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24369</guid>
		<description>Lloyd Rowsey said on July 10th, 2008 at 6:42 am: "Fuck you, Sunil Sharma. I’ve tried to post a comment following bb’s EIGHT TIMES."

Good grief, Lloyd, settle the fuck down or I'll permanently ban you from the comments board. Sheesh. Comments don't immediately appear when you hit the submit button. They go to a queue where an editor has to log in on-line and approve or reject them. We work day jobs and try to lead normal lives and can't always be at a computer to check the comments queue; sometimes there's a long delay and you just gotta be patient. Your eloquently worded post appeared at 6:42 am. So if you were trying to post comments in the wee hours of the morning, chances are I'm going to be sound asleep and it's daytime in S. Korea where Kim is off to labor camp toiling for slave wages. Apparently, Kim found your comment amusing enough to post. 

On another topic, if your article submissions to DV have gone unpublished, it means we just weren't all that dazzled by them. Nothing personal, that's life. Try another publication. One day you might send one we like and post it. 

Regards,

-- Sunil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd Rowsey said on July 10th, 2008 at 6:42 am: &#8220;Fuck you, Sunil Sharma. I’ve tried to post a comment following bb’s EIGHT TIMES.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good grief, Lloyd, settle the fuck down or I&#8217;ll permanently ban you from the comments board. Sheesh. Comments don&#8217;t immediately appear when you hit the submit button. They go to a queue where an editor has to log in on-line and approve or reject them. We work day jobs and try to lead normal lives and can&#8217;t always be at a computer to check the comments queue; sometimes there&#8217;s a long delay and you just gotta be patient. Your eloquently worded post appeared at 6:42 am. So if you were trying to post comments in the wee hours of the morning, chances are I&#8217;m going to be sound asleep and it&#8217;s daytime in S. Korea where Kim is off to labor camp toiling for slave wages. Apparently, Kim found your comment amusing enough to post. </p>
<p>On another topic, if your article submissions to DV have gone unpublished, it means we just weren&#8217;t all that dazzled by them. Nothing personal, that&#8217;s life. Try another publication. One day you might send one we like and post it. </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>&#8211; Sunil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24304</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24304</guid>
		<description>No, Arch, the contempt Americans have for Congress is not the result of Congresspersons behaving like Kucinich, McKinney, and Barbara Lee.  Your anger against all nationally elected representatives is understandable but...I almost didn't ask...what would you have them do?  Commit hari-kari?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Arch, the contempt Americans have for Congress is not the result of Congresspersons behaving like Kucinich, McKinney, and Barbara Lee.  Your anger against all nationally elected representatives is understandable but&#8230;I almost didn&#8217;t ask&#8230;what would you have them do?  Commit hari-kari?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadbeat</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24303</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadbeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24303</guid>
		<description>Another farce is the War on Afghanistan.  The reason is that Al Quida does not and never did represent the Afghan government nor her people.  It was also known at the time that the FBI has NO solid evidence linking Bin Laden to 9-11 and that the Afghan gov't offered their assistance to extradite Bin Laden should the U.S. provide evidence of his involvement.

Only Barbara Lee chose not to give Bush the authority to illegally invade Afghanistan.  Clearly both Kucinich &#38; McKinney sided with the illegal invasion.  Apparently that means Kucinich should be filing an article of impeachment against himself for the sake of "fairness" and "balance".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another farce is the War on Afghanistan.  The reason is that Al Quida does not and never did represent the Afghan government nor her people.  It was also known at the time that the FBI has NO solid evidence linking Bin Laden to 9-11 and that the Afghan gov&#8217;t offered their assistance to extradite Bin Laden should the U.S. provide evidence of his involvement.</p>
<p>Only Barbara Lee chose not to give Bush the authority to illegally invade Afghanistan.  Clearly both Kucinich &amp; McKinney sided with the illegal invasion.  Apparently that means Kucinich should be filing an article of impeachment against himself for the sake of &#8220;fairness&#8221; and &#8220;balance&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24291</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24291</guid>
		<description>“We owe it to our troops who even at this hour stand as sentinels of America because they love this country and will give their lives for it.”

Good one, Dennis.  Preface serious charges against egregious criminals guilty of numerous counts of violating domestic and international law (not to mention the Nuremberg Principles) with jingoist drivel.


“What are we willing to do to match their valor and the valor of their successors?"

You mean aside from empty gestures, meaningless posturing and pious hypocrisies?  I think most everyone knows the answer to that question. 


"Are we at least willing to defend the Constitution from the comfort and security of our Washington, D.C. offices?”

Fuck no.  That's the whole point of having a comfy DC office.


“The way to make sure [the Bush administration] doesn’t attack Iran is to move forward with impeachment now.”

The Bush administration won't attack Iran.  The next admin might but that's doubtful, and not just because these people are sniveling second-rate fascists either.  Check the link for additional details.

http://tonykaron.com/2008/07/09/asking-the-wrong-questions-on-iran-again/


I suppose Kucinich is going to maintain his lib/rad credentials with this pathetic dog and pony show.  No wonder the approval rating of congress is on par with Bush and Cheney's.  Maybe some psychedelic svengali in the democratic party will come up with some brilliant three-fisted scheme to buy a seat in congress for someone who can state clearly, without any trace of bullshitese, WHAT COMES AFTER FARCE because "our" leaders, congress, and yes, troops are about three steps beyond that right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We owe it to our troops who even at this hour stand as sentinels of America because they love this country and will give their lives for it.”</p>
<p>Good one, Dennis.  Preface serious charges against egregious criminals guilty of numerous counts of violating domestic and international law (not to mention the Nuremberg Principles) with jingoist drivel.</p>
<p>“What are we willing to do to match their valor and the valor of their successors?&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean aside from empty gestures, meaningless posturing and pious hypocrisies?  I think most everyone knows the answer to that question. </p>
<p>&#8220;Are we at least willing to defend the Constitution from the comfort and security of our Washington, D.C. offices?”</p>
<p>Fuck no.  That&#8217;s the whole point of having a comfy DC office.</p>
<p>“The way to make sure [the Bush administration] doesn’t attack Iran is to move forward with impeachment now.”</p>
<p>The Bush administration won&#8217;t attack Iran.  The next admin might but that&#8217;s doubtful, and not just because these people are sniveling second-rate fascists either.  Check the link for additional details.</p>
<p><a href="http://tonykaron.com/2008/07/09/asking-the-wrong-questions-on-iran-again/" rel="nofollow">http://tonykaron.com/2008/07/09/asking-the-wrong-questions-on-iran-again/</a></p>
<p>I suppose Kucinich is going to maintain his lib/rad credentials with this pathetic dog and pony show.  No wonder the approval rating of congress is on par with Bush and Cheney&#8217;s.  Maybe some psychedelic svengali in the democratic party will come up with some brilliant three-fisted scheme to buy a seat in congress for someone who can state clearly, without any trace of bullshitese, WHAT COMES AFTER FARCE because &#8220;our&#8221; leaders, congress, and yes, troops are about three steps beyond that right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hp</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24289</link>
		<dc:creator>hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24289</guid>
		<description>Shouldn't the Shrub be prosecuted for defaming old Glory? 
That ought to be one of them there misdeameanors, oughtin it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the Shrub be prosecuted for defaming old Glory?<br />
That ought to be one of them there misdeameanors, oughtin it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24278</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24278</guid>
		<description>lloyd, 
i meant to say  that  sit'n is too perilous for the house  of horrors  for me  to be frivolous, etc., and not for cuchinich.  he's croatian like me. so i have even deeper respect for him.
i'm gonna try to find out  where  kuchinichi come from
his  surname indciates his family is  from dalmatia or other coastal regions of croatia. thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lloyd,<br />
i meant to say  that  sit&#8217;n is too perilous for the house  of horrors  for me  to be frivolous, etc., and not for cuchinich.  he&#8217;s croatian like me. so i have even deeper respect for him.<br />
i&#8217;m gonna try to find out  where  kuchinichi come from<br />
his  surname indciates his family is  from dalmatia or other coastal regions of croatia. thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24276</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24276</guid>
		<description>GREAT PIC of the Chipmunk, hp.  It goes directly into my "Politics" folder and to the best of my knowledge is the only picture there of any Ivy League graduate, however privileged or blighted by elitism.   (Separate categories.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT PIC of the Chipmunk, hp.  It goes directly into my &#8220;Politics&#8221; folder and to the best of my knowledge is the only picture there of any Ivy League graduate, however privileged or blighted by elitism.   (Separate categories.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24274</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24274</guid>
		<description>Well, I've not saved the reference to a BBC headline of several hours ago, saying Rice and the boys warned Iran abou that nasty testing of missles that can reach the Levant over Iraq.  My comment was that I was not trying to change the subject from that of Jason Leopold because Kucinich's new resolution was "spot-on" as they say.  I also mentioned in passing, to bozhidar, that Dennis Kucinich for one does not consider the situation (sit'n) to be frivolous, nor is he being sarcastic, or to engag(ing) in stupidities. 

Now, what could Sunil Sharma find offesnive about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve not saved the reference to a BBC headline of several hours ago, saying Rice and the boys warned Iran abou that nasty testing of missles that can reach the Levant over Iraq.  My comment was that I was not trying to change the subject from that of Jason Leopold because Kucinich&#8217;s new resolution was &#8220;spot-on&#8221; as they say.  I also mentioned in passing, to bozhidar, that Dennis Kucinich for one does not consider the situation (sit&#8217;n) to be frivolous, nor is he being sarcastic, or to engag(ing) in stupidities. </p>
<p>Now, what could Sunil Sharma find offesnive about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24272</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24272</guid>
		<description>so, hp, you suggest I try the post...now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, hp, you suggest I try the post&#8230;now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hp</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24267</link>
		<dc:creator>hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24267</guid>
		<description>Lloyd, Lloyd, Lloyd.
Now is that any way for a Harvard man to talk?
We expect it from those Yalies like Bush, but aw c'mon now.

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/w/b/bush_finger_flip.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd, Lloyd, Lloyd.<br />
Now is that any way for a Harvard man to talk?<br />
We expect it from those Yalies like Bush, but aw c&#8217;mon now.</p>
<p><a href="http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/w/b/bush_finger_flip.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/w/b/bush_finger_flip.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24244</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24244</guid>
		<description>Fuck you, Sunil Sharma.  I've tried to post a comment following bb's EIGHT TIMES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck you, Sunil Sharma.  I&#8217;ve tried to post a comment following bb&#8217;s EIGHT TIMES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/kucinich-to-introduce-new-article-of-impeachment-against-bush/#comment-24230</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2329#comment-24230</guid>
		<description>impeach them, yes. but it wd have been better if we cd impeach that funny uncle who is getting funnier by day.
it's the UNCLE, uncle sam, stupid; we'l never get him!
don't get me wrong, kucinich  deserves praise. but the most we can get out of this is impeachment of al-bushi, al-cheni, la khondi, et al.
but,but, but;  next time the funni uncle simpli arms self  w. the thruth and off  he goes and wages  at least  10 more wars.
sorry if i sound cynical.  that is not my intention. i seriously aver that that might happen. 
the sit'n is just  too perilous to be frivolous, sarcastic,  or to engage in stupidities. thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>impeach them, yes. but it wd have been better if we cd impeach that funny uncle who is getting funnier by day.<br />
it&#8217;s the UNCLE, uncle sam, stupid; we&#8217;l never get him!<br />
don&#8217;t get me wrong, kucinich  deserves praise. but the most we can get out of this is impeachment of al-bushi, al-cheni, la khondi, et al.<br />
but,but, but;  next time the funni uncle simpli arms self  w. the thruth and off  he goes and wages  at least  10 more wars.<br />
sorry if i sound cynical.  that is not my intention. i seriously aver that that might happen.<br />
the sit&#8217;n is just  too perilous to be frivolous, sarcastic,  or to engage in stupidities. thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
