Comments on: Zionism’s Dead End

By: bozhidar balkas

bozhidar balkas — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:05:04 +0000

by rewarding ashkenazic volk, we do, i deduce, encourage other peoples to do what ashkenazic people have done and do now.
these acts may be viewed as rewards:
letting illegal immigrants into palestine stay.
letting them stay and approving of it after they attack indigenes and expelling ab. 700,000 pals.
doing nothing to free some 8-10td kidnapped people who have been i jail for decades or yrs.
doing nothing to bring criminals to justice
two-state ’sol,n’
one-state ’solution’ w. ashkenazim/w’jewry/US in control.
reduction of palestine to wisps/shreds of ab. possibly 10% of its original size and just possibly touching here and there and maybe not even that.
i say world should demand these bastards’ expulsion from palestine before israel’s probable demise or perils to all of us.
yes. w’jewry endanger all of us. one way out is to expel zionists.
this is not racism to me but basically justice. thank u

By: bozhidar balkas

bozhidar balkas — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:23:49 +0000

kim petersen,
the crimes of christo-ashkenazic people r too numerous to enumerate.
let’s go down to basics. when shaken or in doubt i choose simplicity over comlexity; ie, i go to basics.
eg, US has no right to attack another land no matter what prediction, rationalization, demonization, evocation of perils, etc. US makes.
in case of w’jewry/christian-pals/arab/muslim conflict, it is to me of utmost import that we never reward people like ben gurion, rabin, sharon and their numerous partners in crimes some of which r unique such as child-,woman, and manhunt.
i know of no such precendent. even some christians r now horrified ab it.
so, we reward them as league of nations and UN prior to ‘49 had done.
even a two-state ’sol’n’ amounts to rewarding some of the worst war criminals we’v ever had.
nat, i wd prefer all criminals stand trial. but the law today is EU/US; thus most criminals most likely will never face humanities to answer for their (mis)deeds.
in case of eventually destruction of the criminal state, most ashkenazim will flee.
in add’n, most ashkenazim live outside israel.
i hope i have explained my concerns. as said before, they r basic; ie, undefinable. thank u

By: hp

hp — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:45:15 +0000

“Immorality: The morality of those having a better time.”
Mencken

By: evie

evie — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:30:58 +0000

Problem is … one man’s definition of “principles and morality” (doctrine and conduct) may be at odds with another man’s definition.

One man’s idea of progress and justice may interfere with another man’s definition. For example - who am I, or you, or anyone to tell believers in clitorectomy they are morally and socially ignorant and unjust? Is that practice any more backassward than women who pay to have silicone shoved under their chest wall and into their lips?

It’s puerile to think stinginess and borders are what divides. You could erase borders tomorrow and grant unlimited freedom of movement - and most of the human race would still divide itself by race, religion, dogma, politics, social class, income, age, gender, sexual orientation, personal proclivities, etc. etc.

And then, what to do, what to do - with the millions among us who are completely devoid of principles and morality? Those millions who have no sense of connection to humanity outside their own personal circle jerk.

An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it is also more nourishing. -H. L. Mencken.

By: Kim Petersen

Kim Petersen — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:17:26 +0000

In response to some comments in this thread: the fight for justice and against racism toward Palestinians must not be carried out by evoking another racism. All forms of racism are abhorrent. Progressivism and social justice mean nothing if principles and morality are not adhered to.

Furthermore, sending people back to where they originated is no solution either. It is unprincipled. We are all humans. Many of us are curious what lies elsewhere. Freedom of movement is a right. National borders serve to divide humanity, and encourage some people to greedily hang on to resources and wealth that lie within borders instead of sharing.

By: hp

hp — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:28:27 +0000

dan e, whatever it is, it will ultimately amount to psychopathic miscreant-ism.
It always does. Why would ‘next time’ be any different?

By: bozhidar balkas

bozhidar balkas — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:12:08 +0000

dan e,
according to historians i read, hitler in early 30s wanted jews out of germany. thus he suggested ashkenazic people (an euro-asian folk who latched onto zionism/judaism) settle in madagaskar.
the final sol’n idea came later.
by judenfrei (german for free of jews) i mean that ashkenazic people now living in israel should be expelled back to europe and elsewhere.
i have no objection to mizrahic jews staying in expalestine.
mizrahic people r pure semites.
they may also be pure jews. be it as it may, jews have lived continuously in that region for possibly 3td yrs.
thus have the right to remain. they r culturally similar to arabs and pals as well.
i am s’mwhat surprised that it never dawned on me that the ” judenfrei” wd be interpreted that i meant to slaughter all israelites.
thank u for bringing up the confusion. my apology to u. thank u

By: dan e

dan e — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:55:48 +0000

Baldizar B, I object to your use of the term “judenfrei”. I’m sure you don’t really mean what the term implies , that you want to kill all the Jews? Not that there are in my opinion more than a handful of completely innocent Israelis, but guilty parties must be held responsible for their criminal acts, not punished for their “Jewishness” or other ethnic/religious identity.

Please clarify what you meant? Thank you.

hp — How about Tikkunism? Actually I think what we’ll see will be called “Socialism” by its creators/recruiters/PR flaks, and be largely based on ideology now current among various soi-disant “Trotskyist” tribes.

By: hp

hp — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:47:09 +0000

The question is what new “ism” will these psychopathic miscreants morph into next, when Zionism burns out or is extinguished?

By: bozhidar balkas

bozhidar balkas — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:17:19 +0000

excellent piece, an elucidation by cook.
but even if all gazans ‘leave’ and US accepts it as voluntary exodus, israel does not obtain much of value.
it wd have been still too tiny/poor, in danger. in danger, because none of the arabs wd ever gladhand it.
being hated, assiduously criticized/exposed by at least 5bn ( and growing in number) people is not an easy burden to carry.
what they have sewn, they wd have reaped unless they agree to one-state sol’n.
thank u