Comments on: President Sarkozy’s One Man Show: A Very Limited Run

By: hp

hp — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:55:07 +0000

Last but not least, everyone should see this.
A perfect example of the absolute power Israel and her treasonous minions in our country exert over everything from TV news and newspapers to movies, telecommunications, finance, and even college curriculum.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRZSzdQuOqM&feature=related#

By: hp

hp — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:42:17 +0000

Here’s a little taste of the rotten truth of our “special friend.”
Our Israeli “friends” also ran the security at each airport the hi-jacked planes were hi-jacked from. And on and on and on.
Special, isn’t it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo#

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwckJoP7-wg&feature=related#

By: hp

hp — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:14:03 +0000

Nothing like a little humor with which to tell the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gawcd4Pq-M#

By: Lloyd Rowsey

Lloyd Rowsey — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:40:46 +0000

My ignorance encompassed that also, hp.

And don’t let this get around, but I tried to read James Petras’ The Power of Israel in the United States and found it so poorly done I didn’t get past about page 40. I say “don’t let this get around” because, you may note, I complimented Petras highly in a post (above). Apparently, when you praise some authors one place and criticize them in another, it’s not because their writing and general presentations differ from one work to another, instead it’s because you are inconsistent (or worse).

By: hp

hp — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:19:16 +0000

All three candidates for POTUS and half the Congress on their knees before AIPAC this week says it all.
Lloyd, what about the fact that AIPAC isn’t even required to register as a foreign lobby?
Because it isn’t a foreign lobby, it just seems like one…
Isn’t that special?

By: Lloyd Rowsey

Lloyd Rowsey — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:34:09 +0000

And regarding Binyamin Netanyahu, hp, there’s possibly a discussion brewing about academics in politics over at Robert Jensen’s article of June 6 - “Masculine, Feminine or Human?”

By: Lloyd Rowsey

Lloyd Rowsey — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:42:29 +0000

A pic is worth a 1,000… Thanx for this info, hp, and not a diatribe. As we close in on nut-cutting time (with no slight intended to the ladies), everyone seriously concerned to get a message across, mayby should (1) assume their readers know nothing, and (2) pare down their critiques as much as humanly possible. My ignorance encompassed, for example, not only the name Martin Peretz and the fact of his editorship at The New Republic, but his equating foulness with being non-Kosher.

By: hp

hp — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:31:40 +0000

Here’s Bernie boy with some pretty righteous war criminals.
Hashim (I’ll sell you a kidney cheap) Thaci, …Bernie (Zion’s little helper) Kouchner,…General Michael (I’m not starting world war III for the likes of you) Jackson,… Agim (call me ’snake’) Ceku,.. and last but certainly not least Wesley (I just found out last week that I’m Jewish) Clark.

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/events-images/a328_clark_ceku_2050081722-5981.jpg

By: hp

hp — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:39:34 +0000

Well, you can take the “boys” (both Sarkozy and Kouchner) out of the “country,” but you can’t take the “country” out of the “boys.” So to speak.
Betrayal, subterfuge, deceit and treason is their birthright. They’ve done absolutely nothing to disprove this, everything to prove it. They’re both Zionists and that’s all anyone needs to know.

Here’s Sarkozy:
“Should I remind you the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as a second mother homeland? There is nothing outrageous about it. Every Jew carries within him a fear passed down through generations, and he knows that if one day he will not feel safe in his country, there will always be a place that would welcome him. And this is Israel.”
Must be very comforting for Frenchmen to know that their President has already relegated them to questionable (second) status and is convinced that one day he and his brethren will have to flee for their lives to their “true” home. Isn’t this a classic example of neurotic behavior?

Here’s an endorsement from an ultra-Zionist and one of the vilest men alive:
Likud chairman Binyamin Netanyahu has said that with the coming to power of his friend Sarkozy, he expects French Middle East policy “will no longer be characterized by reflective anti-Israelism.”

Sarkozy’s choice for Foreign Minister seems to have delighted some — the extreme-right Free Republic, and Zionist hawk and anti-Arab/Islamophobic editor of The New Republic, Martin Peretz, for instance. Peretz magnanimously forgives Kouchner’s socialist past; it does not make ’make him foul or “treyf” (non-Kosher)’, because ”Kouchner and Sarkozy have intellectual and political bonds that cross party lines”. (wink wink)

“Israel got lucky [with Kouchner]. Israelis should thank God it’s him and not Vedrine“.

To be French and have these Jewish-Zionist wolves “looking out for your country” is about as comforting as having Zionists John McCain and Joe (Israel first) Lieberman “looking out” for the USA.
If anything Mr. Petras is far to kind, treats these Zionist cretins with kid gloves. I’d advise the French to sharpen those blades and oil those hinges.

By: Lloyd Rowsey

Lloyd Rowsey — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:48:57 +0000

I may be wrong Michael, but I read the piece as almost a classic of ironic “detached” description. Sort of a Gourevitch’s “We Wish to Inform You…” condensed to the length of an article.

I don’t possess sufficient data to respond to the points you make in your third paragraph. So I’ll shut up after repeating — although I agree with you 100% that Sarko is a tinhorn politico, I disagree that Petras’ article shows he has been taken in by the man’s recent performances.

No wait, I’ll add in regard to your final sentence. I too base posted comments on my recollections. But I’m very chary of doing this when the article in question is by an academic.

By: Michael Kenny

Michael Kenny — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:17:30 +0000

Something that has struck me recently, on both the left and the right of the American political spectrum, is that the extremists are getting ever more frantic, ever more hysterical, ever more virulent.

It doesn’t seem to have dawned on Professor Petras that hostage negotiations are, of their very nature, conducted in secret. The fact that Sarko has played all this out in public (unlike what he has done in other hostage situations) tells us that he doesn’t give a damn what happens in Colombia, one way or the other. He doesn’t give a damn either what happens to Ingrid Betancourt. Indeed, his conduct suggests that he expects her to die in captivity. He is merely playing to the French political gallery, so as to be able to say that did “all he could” when we hear that she is dead. The fact that Professor Petras fell for the trick hook, line and sinker suggests considerable political naiveté on his part.

As for Kouchner, his name is Bernard. The French do not normally abbreviate first names and sneering or personal insuts should be beneath the dignity of those who engage in serious political discussion. More specifically, he did not “announce his backing of US troops”, he announced his backing for the reconstruction of Iraq after the war was over. That the US media might have falsely reported him would be nothing new. It already claimed he had called for an attack on Iran when he said that the world should prepare itself for a US/Israel attack on Iran. If I recall correctly, Professor Petras fell for that piece of propaganda hook, line and sinker as well!