Gary Revel
Martin Luther King Assassination Investigation News Feed
http://www.garyrevel.com/news2.xml

I met a man. His name was Tupper Saussy. He happened to have been the ghost writer for a book by James Earl Ray, entitled “ Tennessee Waltz” published in 1987. The book gives Ray’s account of the events to state that he did not kill Dr. King.

Saussy’s view, in his long conversations with me, was that James Earl Ray was not Dr. King’s murderer and he explained to me in considerable detail why Ray was not the killer, then gave me a copy of the book which I then read.

On Thursday, the 3rd April, 2008, I watched a CNN special on the eve of the anniversary of Dr. King’s assassination. The book came back to mind and I asked myself on conclusion of the CNN special – why is CNN trying to confuse the public?

Before I return to the book’s contents, I would invite the reader to look at the physical location at the Lorraine Motel, where Dr. King was shot, and consider the photographs of the positioning of surrounding buildings, the trajectory of the bullet, and the direction that the witnesses present were all pointing to when the single shot rang out that killed Dr. King. The web site is worth a visit and it is at :-(http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE1/overlooked.html).

The reasoning at the web site is sound, the pictures are clear and the conclusions can logically be drawn.

Back to the book. Read Ray’s own story for yourself and draw your own conclusions. The points I would leave you with are these:-

A. Why would the witnesses present all be pointing in the direction they heard the shot come from, and CNN be leading the unsuspecting public in 2008 towards some alternative belief that they were pointing elsewhere to a window at a rooming house across the street, from where Ray is supposed to have shot Dr. King?
B. Is there anything to be made of Ray’s reference to an operative or handler called “Raoul”, and if Ray was this perfect sniper shot who assassinated Dr. King – did he simply conveniently drop all his evidence outside the doorway of the rooming house, to link him to the crime?
C. If, it was Ray’s doing from reference to B above – then why don’t the test bullets fired from the weapon attributed to Ray not ballistically match the bullet taken from Dr. King – so who did fire the weapon that killed Dr. King?

Conclusion

A single person cannot be in two places at the same time. There are two (2) vantage points for the location of the sniper who did the shooting (1) a window from the rooming house and (2) the Gattis penthouse ( to which Andrew Young and all other witnesses are pointing at the time of the shooting).

Again, carefully review the photographic evidence at the web site:- (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE1/overlooked.html).

Now – you decide – who killed Dr. Martin Luther King?

When the state is confronted with legitimate challenges against its destructive polices:-

“…I knew that I could not ever again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greater purveyor of violence in the world: my own government.” Martin Luther King in his “Beyond Vietnam” 1967 speech.
it has the power to destroy those who dare speak truth to power. The agents of the government of the United States of America did first attempt to destroy the reputation of Dr. Martin Luther, and used its FBI’s COINTELPRO program to try by criminal means to destroy the credence of those who fought for and sought equal rights and justice. When that failed – well – simply stated, the agents of the state just murdered Dr. King.
Courtenay Barnett – 4th April, 2008
________________________________________________
Courtenay Barnett is a graduate of London University. His areas of study were economics, political science and international law. He has been a practising lawyer for over twenty years, has been arrested for defending his views, and has argued public interest and human rights cases. His web site: http://www.globaljusticeonline.com
________________________________________________

I find the Dept. of Justice lacking in credibility. I find the U.S. government systematically lying to the American people, by both omission and secrecy, and overt lying and misrepresentation. A government that continually twists the meaning of constitution, law and treaty, torturing people, snooping without warrants, holding prisoners without habeas corpus, lacks credibility.

The track record of the U.S. government in past crimes is poor. We were told Oswald acted alone, a magic bullet hit both victims, we were told America was under attack in the Tonkin Gulf, that Saddam harbored Al Qaida and was preparing to detonate nuclear bombs in American cities. The entire federal government from Bush and Congress, down to the local IRS or FCC or military recruiters, continually talks to as if we were children or imbeciles. Meanwhile killing millions of people in imperial wars of aggression.

So the DOJ can take their “conclusion” and shove it. We have learned, long ago, not to expect any justice from the Dept of Justice. And we are not surprised by their “opinion” that Bill Pepper and his witnesses are “not credible”. Lacking a real rebuttal they apparently fall back on smear and ad-hominem.

I remain open to factual rebuttal if there is any.

TUC is among te very best independent radio programs in the world. If one hasn’t listened one has missed a lot!

Maria is herself one of the most brilliant, fascinating and beautiful people I’ve ever had the pleasure to meet.

Here’s a snapshot of her last year at an event in Oakland:

http://tinyurl.com/54egqv