Comments on: Billions for Wall Street, A Kick in the Pants for You and I http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:15:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: D. R. Munro http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16565 D. R. Munro Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:42:21 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16565 Wow, talk about invasion of the English pedants. . . Anyways . . . Perhaps a good old kick in the pants is what people need? Wow, talk about invasion of the English pedants. . .

Anyways . . .

Perhaps a good old kick in the pants is what people need?

]]> By: Michael Kenny http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16543 Michael Kenny Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:45:47 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16543 It's totally peripheral but please, please, the English language! "For" takes the accusative. "For you and me", therefore. (Would you say "a kick in the pants for I"?) It’s totally peripheral but please, please, the English language! “For” takes the accusative. “For you and me”, therefore. (Would you say “a kick in the pants for I”?)

]]> By: HR http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16513 HR Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:18:19 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16513 Gee, what a surprise. Who'd a thought, in a country populated by fools -- and I mean damned fools -- who elected monster trash like Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and pick any of the three corporate candidates running now. People get the government they deserve. And, Obama appears to be a disciple of Reagan. Sickening how that corporate lackey of a "Democratic" candidate can babble about supposed excesses in the 70s (yeah, excesses of increasing salaries for corporate executives while workers lost ground, excesses of corporate consolidation, excesses of inflation, excesses of murder in Southeast Asia, and the like) and then essentially give praise to one of the worst monsters ever to occupy the White House. Gee, what a surprise. Who’d a thought, in a country populated by fools — and I mean damned fools — who elected monster trash like Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and pick any of the three corporate candidates running now. People get the government they deserve. And, Obama appears to be a disciple of Reagan. Sickening how that corporate lackey of a “Democratic” candidate can babble about supposed excesses in the 70s (yeah, excesses of increasing salaries for corporate executives while workers lost ground, excesses of corporate consolidation, excesses of inflation, excesses of murder in Southeast Asia, and the like) and then essentially give praise to one of the worst monsters ever to occupy the White House.

]]> By: Arch Stanton http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16491 Arch Stanton Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:43:03 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16491 So let me get this straight here: You're saying that Bush and Wall Street don't have our best interests at heart? Doh! I guess we better do something about it. So let me get this straight here: You’re saying that Bush and Wall Street don’t have our best interests at heart? Doh! I guess we better do something about it.

]]> By: simuvac http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16482 simuvac Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:41:08 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16482 For you and "me". It is the objective case here. For you and “me”.

It is the objective case here.

]]> By: Don Hawkins http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16479 Don Hawkins Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:26:03 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/billions-for-wall-street-a-kick-in-the-pants-for-you-and-i/#comment-16479 Something is rotten in the state of Denmark Something is rotten in the state of Denmark

]]>