The Truth about Immigration

Everything negative you’ve heard about immigration is true. In fact, all the election cycle talk about lazy parasites pouring over borders to leech off another nation’s resources doesn’t go far enough in explaining the gravity of this ongoing crisis. Scream it from the mountaintops (or at least on your blog): Immigrants are destroying any and all hope of for planetary survival. Illegal aliens are Public Enemy #1. Foreigners are terrorists.

If you don’t believe me, just ask any sweatshop worker in, say, Vietnam…

The perfidious colonizers I refer to, of course, are the insatiable transnational corporations setting up camp all across the Third World. Whether it be Nike, The Gap, Wal-Mart, or any other taxpayer-subsidized bloodsucker, these crafty illegal aliens can’t be stopped by constructing a mere wall. They travel with impunity… on the wings of government subvention and cunning, relentless propaganda. Thanks to decades of conditioning, even the victims of these soulless migrants will voluntarily pay for the right to wear a shirt bearing their corporate logo.

One would not be engaging in hyperbole to characterize these illegal invaders as “terrorists.” Forget color-coded alerts, staged arrests, and manufactured scares. Put aside those times you were forced to remove your shoes at the airport. As defined at Dictionary.com: “an overwhelming feeling of fear and anxiety” and/or an “intense, overpowering fear” characterize brand of the terror I speak of.

While the corporate media obscures the real terror and trains its focus on the latest battle between Dubya and Osama (or the current villain of the day), the primary conflict on the planet remains unchanged: globalization from above vs. globalization from below.

“Immigrants” like the World Trade Organization, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and transnational corporations are elements of a mutant form of remote control imperialism. The United States doesn’t always have to send armies into other countries. It sends in Disney and McDonalds with the (usually) unspoken threat of military force backing them up.

Globalization is not intrinsically a bad idea. Mutually beneficial global ties can be essential. As Michael Albert of ZNet has articulated, the goal should be to globalize equity not poverty, solidarity not anti-sociality, diversity not conformity, democracy not subordination, and ecological balance not suicidal rapaciousness. Novelist/activist Arundhati Roy adds: “In the present circumstances, I’d say that the only thing worth globalizing is dissent.”

But perhaps Groucho said it best in Monkey Business: “There’s my argument: restrict immigration.”

Mickey Z. is the author of the forthcoming novel, CPR for Dummies (Raw Dog Screaming Press). He can be found on the Web at MickeyZ.net. Read other articles by Mickey, or visit Mickey's website.

One comment on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Deadbeat said on December 13th, 2007 at 10:39 am #

    As Michael Albert of ZNet has articulated, the goal should be to globalize equity not poverty, solidarity not anti-sociality, diversity not conformity, democracy not subordination, and ecological balance not suicidal rapaciousness

    These are quaint sentiments coming from Michael Albert however the “left” needs much work. Mr. Albert so-called “parecon” is extremely flawed and unfortunately creates disjointness on the left. Susan Rothenthal has an excellent critique of “parecon” in her book <a href=”http://www.powerandpowerlessness.com”Power and Powerlessness.

    In addition, Albert also cowardly supported the flawed “Anybody But Bush” so-called “safe state” strategy in 2004 and promoted other ineffective rhetoric surrounding the War in Iraq.

    The U.S. “left’s” obfuscation of the “elephant” in the room and weakness of commitment to principles are primary reasons why IMO the U.S. “left” may not be a part of any global solidarity. As progressive challenges occur outside the parameters of the U.S. it may take a long time before U.S. catches up to the rest of the world due to these divisions within the U.S. left.

Add to the discussion