Based on a pattern which started in 1979, it is correct to consider the governments of the following countries as responsible for Benazir’s assassination:

US/ UK/ Germany/Austria/Switzerland/Israel/China/Netherlands/
Saudi Arabia/ Iran/Qatar/Kuwait/Egypt/U.A.E./Pakistan.

1979, is the year that Brzezinski, on behalf of the Trilateral Commission, started the implementation of the imperialist “Green Crescent” theory, against socialism, by creating Islamist regimes! That is also the year that Zia declared Pakistan as an Islamist regime in conformity with his imperialists masters! You know the rest…

“But the neo-Talibs and their al-Qaeda sponsors did not rise on their own. US intelligence and senior intelligence sources in India both accused elements of Pakistan’s intelligence establishment and the army of giving succor to the new movement. A hard-core group had emerged that was alleged to have consorted, coached, and sheltered the neo-Taliban et al. They included General Mohammed Aziz, who until October 2004 was Musharraf’s chairman of the joint chiefs of staff; General Hamid Gul, the former director general of the ISI, forced out of office by Benazir Bhutto after planning with Osama bin Laden to assassinate her; General Javid Nasir, the former director general of the ISI who blocked CIA attempts to recall Stinger missiles from Afghanistan; General Mahmood Ahmed, another former ISI director who had been linked by the FBI to the World Trade Center bombers; General Zahir-ul-Islam Abbasi, who had plotted a coup against Benazir Bhutto in 1995 and was pardoned by Musharraf in October 2001; and Squadron Leader Khalid Khawaja, a former ISI officer, a man accused of knowingly leading the Jewish-American reporter Daniel Pearl to meet Islamists in Karachi before they decapitated him in February 2002. Khawaja was already in jail on another matter, having instigated a band of female students at the Jamia Hafsa madrasah in central Islamabad, a seminary very closely connected to the Taliban (and to the ISI’s headquarters in the capital), to demonstrate in support of Osama bin Laden. On 28 March 2007 the same women students stormed a building they said was a brothel, taking three women and two police officers hostage. The deputy imam of the Lal Masjid, Maulana Abdul Aziz, teacher to the students, supported the actions and went even further, telling his congregation that they should become suicide bombers if the government ever decided to move against them. This was not the tribal areas - this was happening, with no reaction from Musharraf, in the nation’s sophisticated capital.” - from Levy, Adrian & Scott-Clark, Catherine. “Deception: Pakistan, the United States, and the Secret Trade in Nuclear Weapons.” New York: Walker & Co., 2007, pg. 434.

Examining the situation, though, as with any murder case, we have to look at who would have a motive to commit the assassination, and who would support such an act. Elements of the Pakistani government had a reason to eliminate Bhutto, as well as the Islamic militants who are connected to the military and state apparatus. It will be interesting to see whether the groups acted on orders from the ISI/Musharraf, or the assassination was tacitly acceded to by said groups.

Do you deny that Musharraf had the most to lose from a PPP victory in the elections, which would certainly have brought Bhutto into the position of PM, or that the Pakistani state has the resources to conduct such assassinations (and has done so in the past)? Or, that militant religious zealots in the government have ties with Pashtun/Taliban militants and other elements in Waziristan and the Kashmir?

I would encourage independent analysis and research on this event. It is difficult to trust fully what any government says, and it is likely that the official story emanating from Pakistan and the US government will either be false or only partially true. Yet, unlike events such as 9/11, it is quite possible to believe a military government would have ordered a hit on a prominent and vocal critic of their policies, even she had initially aided them in her previous two terms.

When you say, “As will no doubt turn out to be the case, Ms. Bhutto has also been assassinated by the Pakistani government, etc…” you effectively put the nails in the coffin of your analysis. You proposed a limited-vision hypothesis as a model for the assassination of Bhutto, and my question is, based on what yardstick of data you reached that conclusion? And why did you exclude external forces with interest in the occupation of Afghanistan such as the American neocon establishment as recently evidenced by F. Kagan calling for contingency plans to seize Pakistan nuclear weapons, and the Zionist Obama prospecting the use of nuclear weapons in the same country? Why, instead of theory we can rely of Rice’s “creative chaos” theory whereby the assassination of Bhutto could provoke upheaval in the country thus providing the rationales to implement Kagan’s exhortation?

In Short, what is the source of yours, “No Doubt”? And then you tried to convince the reader that the things are the way to describe them, by calling on us that “must understand that the inter-twining of the Pakistani government and militant Islamist groups has been common practice (and common knowledge within international circles)”

Excuse me Sir, but can you identify these circles? And why is that Pakistani matters are known to these circles? Are you Sir, a part of these circles?

This article has the same assumptions which are the basis of 911 Truth Movement. Because if something happens it only means someone powerful pulled the strings. There is no place for randomness, no place for the initiatives taken from someone adventurous.

It is highly unlikely that militant groups inside Pakistan would carry out an attack on Benazir Bhutto without at least tacit acceptance by high-ranking figures inside the Pakistani government. To do so would invite retribution from their allies in Islamabad, who would be displeased with unrest for which they were unprepared.

Really, By this standard Musharraf faked assassination attempts
on himself. There has already been 2 or 3 attempts on his life. The Jehadi elements have escaped control. These guys have their own ideas. It is stupid to expect all these jehadi elements will obey orders from higher ups. There is a great deal of unrest in Frontier Province. Hundreds of soldiers have been kidnapped by militants. We wouldn’t know that from this piece.
The writer also says ISI created Taliban. He probably doesn’t know this move was approved by Benazir Bhutto. She vetoed military’s plans to invade Indian held Kashmir but approved the Taliban Plan.
Her Interior Minister Nasirullah Babar was the driving force behind the Taliban. She enthusiastically supported Taliban during her second stint as PM.