<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pete, Nancy, George and WWIII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike McNiven</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8219</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McNiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8219</guid>
		<description>During the Algerian anti-colonial war, Jean-Paul Sartre called the members of the French cabinet, the members of  its parliament, the voters and the taxpayers "complicit in the war crimes."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Algerian anti-colonial war, Jean-Paul Sartre called the members of the French cabinet, the members of  its parliament, the voters and the taxpayers &#8220;complicit in the war crimes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8169</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8169</guid>
		<description>Jim --

Democrats are clearly complicit in war crimes.  They --vote-- for the crimes.  They --fund-- the crimes.  If you act in such a way as to help put these people in a position to continue their war crimes, say for example by, I don't know, voting for them and giving them money... then what do you want to call it?   

You want to call it an "outrageous charge" but then you next call Rosemarie an agent provocateur... nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim &#8211;</p>
<p>Democrats are clearly complicit in war crimes.  They &#8211;vote&#8211; for the crimes.  They &#8211;fund&#8211; the crimes.  If you act in such a way as to help put these people in a position to continue their war crimes, say for example by, I don&#8217;t know, voting for them and giving them money&#8230; then what do you want to call it?   </p>
<p>You want to call it an &#8220;outrageous charge&#8221; but then you next call Rosemarie an agent provocateur&#8230; nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8132</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8132</guid>
		<description>I wonder, Hue.  I've been considering asking, "How much you wanna to bet?  Well then, how about a quinella with....?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder, Hue.  I&#8217;ve been considering asking, &#8220;How much you wanna to bet?  Well then, how about a quinella with&#8230;.?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Longer</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8123</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Longer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8123</guid>
		<description>Lloyd,

Will your attorney friend vote for her anyways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p>Will your attorney friend vote for her anyways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Longer</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8122</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Longer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8122</guid>
		<description>Bert,

While I agree that amusement doesn't enter in to the equation, the position of "it's about oil" means many things.

Regarding bio fuels being any kind of answer, the amount of agricultural land needed to replace oil (not factoring in how much oil is needed for the agriculture itself) seems to indicate that it's an impossible pipe dream if consumption were to continue at anything close to the present pace, much less get worse.

I think it's a mistake to entirely blame third world countries for their agricultural circumstances when the US makes damn sure that they are in those circumstances through subsidized US agriculture being forced on markets whose peoples are at the mercy of proxy governments installed or controlled by the US and its empirical trade policies.

The best farmers in the world are having their seeds and crops destroyed directly and indirectly and saying that they need instruction manuals sounds like you're telling them to eat cake.  Suggesting that US corporate  robbers growing gen mod bio-corn in slave states will be feeding people ignores or misunderstands history</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert,</p>
<p>While I agree that amusement doesn&#8217;t enter in to the equation, the position of &#8220;it&#8217;s about oil&#8221; means many things.</p>
<p>Regarding bio fuels being any kind of answer, the amount of agricultural land needed to replace oil (not factoring in how much oil is needed for the agriculture itself) seems to indicate that it&#8217;s an impossible pipe dream if consumption were to continue at anything close to the present pace, much less get worse.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a mistake to entirely blame third world countries for their agricultural circumstances when the US makes damn sure that they are in those circumstances through subsidized US agriculture being forced on markets whose peoples are at the mercy of proxy governments installed or controlled by the US and its empirical trade policies.</p>
<p>The best farmers in the world are having their seeds and crops destroyed directly and indirectly and saying that they need instruction manuals sounds like you&#8217;re telling them to eat cake.  Suggesting that US corporate  robbers growing gen mod bio-corn in slave states will be feeding people ignores or misunderstands history</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McNiven</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McNiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8121</guid>
		<description>"Cindy's dreaming" ! We are lucky that she is dreaming to change the soul-less status quo! As Einstein said, : " Imagination is more important than knowledge."  By the way, in addition to the US population, hundreds of millions of others on this planet need freedom from the harmful effecets of these R&#38;D parties' imperialist policies! Borrowing from Dr.King, "I have a dream,..."!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cindy&#8217;s dreaming&#8221; ! We are lucky that she is dreaming to change the soul-less status quo! As Einstein said, : &#8221; Imagination is more important than knowledge.&#8221;  By the way, in addition to the US population, hundreds of millions of others on this planet need freedom from the harmful effecets of these R&amp;D parties&#8217; imperialist policies! Borrowing from Dr.King, &#8220;I have a dream,&#8230;&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8117</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8117</guid>
		<description>Bert.  I think you make many interesting and valid points.  And I refer you to a wonderful article by Freeman Dyson in his speculative mode in the New York Review of Books.  

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20370

But I think Cindy Sheehan won't have time or the inclination to raise such admittedly fascinating speculations in her campaign in San Francisco for Pelosi's seat in 2008.

And the primary factoid supporting my thought is:  I know an attorney who works in San Francisco, and I emailed him Friday about yesterday's anti-war rallies in San Francisco; he replied simply, "Cindy's dreaming."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert.  I think you make many interesting and valid points.  And I refer you to a wonderful article by Freeman Dyson in his speculative mode in the New York Review of Books.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20370" rel="nofollow">http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20370</a></p>
<p>But I think Cindy Sheehan won&#8217;t have time or the inclination to raise such admittedly fascinating speculations in her campaign in San Francisco for Pelosi&#8217;s seat in 2008.</p>
<p>And the primary factoid supporting my thought is:  I know an attorney who works in San Francisco, and I emailed him Friday about yesterday&#8217;s anti-war rallies in San Francisco; he replied simply, &#8220;Cindy&#8217;s dreaming.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeepPeace</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8111</link>
		<dc:creator>DeepPeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8111</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much Cindy.  When I read that Congressman Stark had apologized, especially tearfully as did Biden after he expressed his shock when the Abu Ghraib torture scandal with photos of the atrocities broke.  Bushco is threatening our Congresspersons and we need to talk about it and get some real protection for them.

It was very out of character for Rep. Stark to not only apologize but grovel and say he would go back to a well-deserved obscurity.  Are they showing Congresspersons photos of Americas who have been spied on and arrested by NSA being tortured?  Is that the NSA scandal that James Comey and the still operating FBI Chief threatened to resign over?

This issue of safety for our Congresspersons and even our Governors and the Don Siegalman case shows needs to be addressed now.  These threats cannot continue, we have to express what we suspect and have some type of investigation - our votes are not going to be counted if we do not stop the intimidation of our Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much Cindy.  When I read that Congressman Stark had apologized, especially tearfully as did Biden after he expressed his shock when the Abu Ghraib torture scandal with photos of the atrocities broke.  Bushco is threatening our Congresspersons and we need to talk about it and get some real protection for them.</p>
<p>It was very out of character for Rep. Stark to not only apologize but grovel and say he would go back to a well-deserved obscurity.  Are they showing Congresspersons photos of Americas who have been spied on and arrested by NSA being tortured?  Is that the NSA scandal that James Comey and the still operating FBI Chief threatened to resign over?</p>
<p>This issue of safety for our Congresspersons and even our Governors and the Don Siegalman case shows needs to be addressed now.  These threats cannot continue, we have to express what we suspect and have some type of investigation - our votes are not going to be counted if we do not stop the intimidation of our Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8105</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8105</guid>
		<description>I kind of agree with Pelosi that what Stark said was 'over the top',
I think he should have looked at the old choice of words, there,
but I think his heart was in the right place on saying it anyway.

Free speech and good taste have never really quite lined up, there,
either on Main Street or in Congress,  and, when all was said and done,
more was said THAN done, as is usually the case in Congress or
elsewhere. 

MY opinion is different from Starks, not that anyone cares, but I'll
share it ANYway. MY opinion is the same as Greenspans, namely
that the war is about OIL, not anyone's amusement, but rather was
an oil war from the outset. My reasoning is underscored(in my little
world, anyway) by the recent UN statement talking about how 
biofuel development and production would cause starvation. I think
that's a crock. I think biofuels have GREAT potential to a) feed the 
world sustainably by helping people to develop crops that have
dual purpose, as with grain, corn, or sugar, if you need to get somewhere you distill em, if you're hungry, eat em, either way the
farming is good practice for doing both jobs. At SOME point, people
 are going to have to get more proficient with the old local food
production. There's a lot of different ways to get that done, the 
simplest is hothouses, where you spend your water pretty frugally
maintaining a humidity level that'll let your seeds jump up, and you
can use some of that oil or your recycled plastic to build em out of.
Any way you slice it, though, more countries are going to have to
get 'happy' with the ag production on their own behalf, and stop trying
to live off our grain exports or whatever, and the Big Global Hurdle
is going to be ocean desalinization, taking seawater, and cleaning it
up to where it's suitable for human, animal, and general ag use. Murkuh
can't do it all for everybody, the 21st century represents a lot of 
change for everyone, we need to develop our biofuels, a lot of other
nations need to just plain develop, and stop waiting for UN/US handouts. Sometimes 'help' doesn't, and instead of rockets and bombs
and promissory gimmebucks, maybe we need to send out literature
on farming, take notes from the best ag countries, bind it all up, call it
a 'how to' book, and distribute those instead. Make it all-inclusive,
multiple languages, and get a lot of people in a lot of different countries
involved in local self-sustaining farming initiatives. When people can
support themselves, then they can be independent and take care of
business on their own behalf and stuff. Doesn't get much better than that, and if we can start producing our own energy, that'll just help
things along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of agree with Pelosi that what Stark said was &#8216;over the top&#8217;,<br />
I think he should have looked at the old choice of words, there,<br />
but I think his heart was in the right place on saying it anyway.</p>
<p>Free speech and good taste have never really quite lined up, there,<br />
either on Main Street or in Congress,  and, when all was said and done,<br />
more was said THAN done, as is usually the case in Congress or<br />
elsewhere. </p>
<p>MY opinion is different from Starks, not that anyone cares, but I&#8217;ll<br />
share it ANYway. MY opinion is the same as Greenspans, namely<br />
that the war is about OIL, not anyone&#8217;s amusement, but rather was<br />
an oil war from the outset. My reasoning is underscored(in my little<br />
world, anyway) by the recent UN statement talking about how<br />
biofuel development and production would cause starvation. I think<br />
that&#8217;s a crock. I think biofuels have GREAT potential to a) feed the<br />
world sustainably by helping people to develop crops that have<br />
dual purpose, as with grain, corn, or sugar, if you need to get somewhere you distill em, if you&#8217;re hungry, eat em, either way the<br />
farming is good practice for doing both jobs. At SOME point, people<br />
 are going to have to get more proficient with the old local food<br />
production. There&#8217;s a lot of different ways to get that done, the<br />
simplest is hothouses, where you spend your water pretty frugally<br />
maintaining a humidity level that&#8217;ll let your seeds jump up, and you<br />
can use some of that oil or your recycled plastic to build em out of.<br />
Any way you slice it, though, more countries are going to have to<br />
get &#8216;happy&#8217; with the ag production on their own behalf, and stop trying<br />
to live off our grain exports or whatever, and the Big Global Hurdle<br />
is going to be ocean desalinization, taking seawater, and cleaning it<br />
up to where it&#8217;s suitable for human, animal, and general ag use. Murkuh<br />
can&#8217;t do it all for everybody, the 21st century represents a lot of<br />
change for everyone, we need to develop our biofuels, a lot of other<br />
nations need to just plain develop, and stop waiting for UN/US handouts. Sometimes &#8216;help&#8217; doesn&#8217;t, and instead of rockets and bombs<br />
and promissory gimmebucks, maybe we need to send out literature<br />
on farming, take notes from the best ag countries, bind it all up, call it<br />
a &#8216;how to&#8217; book, and distribute those instead. Make it all-inclusive,<br />
multiple languages, and get a lot of people in a lot of different countries<br />
involved in local self-sustaining farming initiatives. When people can<br />
support themselves, then they can be independent and take care of<br />
business on their own behalf and stuff. Doesn&#8217;t get much better than that, and if we can start producing our own energy, that&#8217;ll just help<br />
things along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Longer</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8089</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Longer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8089</guid>
		<description>Watch Bill Clinton or even Al Gore (if he doesn't run for pres) come running to defeat Cindy (remember Gonzalez)...I hope they do too, because unless this thing is fixed beyond belief, Nancy will go down and they'll be stuck looking like the lying shills they are when the world doesn't end like they promised it would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch Bill Clinton or even Al Gore (if he doesn&#8217;t run for pres) come running to defeat Cindy (remember Gonzalez)&#8230;I hope they do too, because unless this thing is fixed beyond belief, Nancy will go down and they&#8217;ll be stuck looking like the lying shills they are when the world doesn&#8217;t end like they promised it would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8086</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8086</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:United_States_House_of_Representatives%2C_California_District_8.png

For those who may be wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:United_States_House_of_Representatives%2C_California_District_8.png" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:United_States_House_of_Representatives%2C_California_District_8.png</a></p>
<p>For those who may be wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8083</guid>
		<description>"complicit in the war crimes - and so is every voter who continues to vote for Republicans and Democrats"

You will never get anywhere if you make such outrageous charges against every person voting for Democrats. Do keep in mind that Pete Stark is a Democrat.

Then again, perhaps rosemarie is an agent provocateur, for whom such a charge is straight out of the playbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;complicit in the war crimes - and so is every voter who continues to vote for Republicans and Democrats&#8221;</p>
<p>You will never get anywhere if you make such outrageous charges against every person voting for Democrats. Do keep in mind that Pete Stark is a Democrat.</p>
<p>Then again, perhaps rosemarie is an agent provocateur, for whom such a charge is straight out of the playbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McNiven</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8080</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McNiven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8080</guid>
		<description>Good luck Ms.Sheehan!

(and thank you Ms. Jackowski for your very brave comment!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck Ms.Sheehan!</p>
<p>(and thank you Ms. Jackowski for your very brave comment!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8076</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8076</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Rosemarie Jackowski, for elegantly summarizing the options for me and my fellow voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Rosemarie Jackowski, for elegantly summarizing the options for me and my fellow voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Longer</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Longer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>I remember Dems getting excited about Pelosi, and all I could see was her insane grin at having obtained her seat...I had to ask dems if they were THAT happy, and the response was usually a measured, "no, we have to hold her accountable and there is a lot of work to do".  Then it begged, "what the fuck was she so face splitting happy about"?  

I hope Cindy kicks her when she's down and says, "Nancy you are not my fucking constituent, get off my porch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Dems getting excited about Pelosi, and all I could see was her insane grin at having obtained her seat&#8230;I had to ask dems if they were THAT happy, and the response was usually a measured, &#8220;no, we have to hold her accountable and there is a lot of work to do&#8221;.  Then it begged, &#8220;what the fuck was she so face splitting happy about&#8221;?  </p>
<p>I hope Cindy kicks her when she&#8217;s down and says, &#8220;Nancy you are not my fucking constituent, get off my porch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8069</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8069</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the American people do obtain a source of entertainment from the abstract images and cheerleader slogans of the mass media.

War games, video games, wars in foreign countries populated by people with strange sounding names.  Why else would the American public support every war that the Bush Foggy Folks conjure up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the American people do obtain a source of entertainment from the abstract images and cheerleader slogans of the mass media.</p>
<p>War games, video games, wars in foreign countries populated by people with strange sounding names.  Why else would the American public support every war that the Bush Foggy Folks conjure up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8066</link>
		<dc:creator>dan elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8066</guid>
		<description>Thank you Rosemary, my  sentiments exactly. 

Props to the CodePink member who confronted Condoleeza waving bloody hands in her face! Next move : confront Pelosi the same way? Or Hillery first,  Nasty Pelousi next? 

CodePink wouldn't be giving any Dumockrats a free ride while they focus exclu. on Bush Admin? Naaww, I'm just paranoid, shame on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Rosemary, my  sentiments exactly. </p>
<p>Props to the CodePink member who confronted Condoleeza waving bloody hands in her face! Next move : confront Pelosi the same way? Or Hillery first,  Nasty Pelousi next? </p>
<p>CodePink wouldn&#8217;t be giving any Dumockrats a free ride while they focus exclu. on Bush Admin? Naaww, I&#8217;m just paranoid, shame on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosemarie jackowski</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8053</link>
		<dc:creator>rosemarie jackowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8053</guid>
		<description>Nancy Pelosi is complicit in the war crimes - and so is every voter who continues to vote for Republicans and Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Pelosi is complicit in the war crimes - and so is every voter who continues to vote for Republicans and Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8050</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8050</guid>
		<description>Cindy for Congress;   Does your Mission statement include the
Israel./Palestine conflict?

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy for Congress;   Does your Mission statement include the<br />
Israel./Palestine conflict?</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony murschel</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8047</link>
		<dc:creator>tony murschel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pete-nancy-george-and-wwiii/#comment-8047</guid>
		<description>It's good to see that you're going to starting writing AND cashing your own checks!!  It's about time that a person with your stature stands up and gets in the ring,  instead of trying to win the fight from the crowd--which I'm sure you realized is impossible.  I do hope that you take away Pelosi's seat.  I am also looking forward to a time when C-SPAN will be rated higher than Heroes.  Why bother tuning into a fake show when you could see a real hero live on C-SPAN pushing the buttons that will make all of these career politicians' sweat like they're up on charges for indecency or corruption?  England may have more surveillance, less rights, and worse weather than the U.S., but at least their PM has to converse directly with the people's representatives.  Could you imagine 'W' being part of a live debate where his 'handlers' don't have time to prescreen questions and the crowd isn't chosen based on their ability to write checks to the RNC?  That would be bigger than any UFC or WWF PPV event, ever!  So here's to the future of our country and the return to Democracy (not Democratic) based values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see that you&#8217;re going to starting writing AND cashing your own checks!!  It&#8217;s about time that a person with your stature stands up and gets in the ring,  instead of trying to win the fight from the crowd&#8211;which I&#8217;m sure you realized is impossible.  I do hope that you take away Pelosi&#8217;s seat.  I am also looking forward to a time when C-SPAN will be rated higher than Heroes.  Why bother tuning into a fake show when you could see a real hero live on C-SPAN pushing the buttons that will make all of these career politicians&#8217; sweat like they&#8217;re up on charges for indecency or corruption?  England may have more surveillance, less rights, and worse weather than the U.S., but at least their PM has to converse directly with the people&#8217;s representatives.  Could you imagine &#8216;W&#8217; being part of a live debate where his &#8216;handlers&#8217; don&#8217;t have time to prescreen questions and the crowd isn&#8217;t chosen based on their ability to write checks to the RNC?  That would be bigger than any UFC or WWF PPV event, ever!  So here&#8217;s to the future of our country and the return to Democracy (not Democratic) based values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
