<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Removing a Failed President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/removing-a-failed-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/removing-a-failed-president/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/removing-a-failed-president/#comment-3753</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 02:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/removing-a-failed-president/#comment-3753</guid>
		<description>Here are the main features of the amendment: The recall procedure would begin by obtaining a 60 percent vote in the Senate and House. Public pressure on Congress could help it shift decisionmaking to the electorate. Congressional support would initiate a national referendum that would be open to all eligible voters in state elections. "

If Congress is not willing to impeach them, why do you it would be willing to vote 60 percent to give "we the people" the option of impeaching them?

But wow, what a joy it would be to work on such a project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the main features of the amendment: The recall procedure would begin by obtaining a 60 percent vote in the Senate and House. Public pressure on Congress could help it shift decisionmaking to the electorate. Congressional support would initiate a national referendum that would be open to all eligible voters in state elections. &#8221;</p>
<p>If Congress is not willing to impeach them, why do you it would be willing to vote 60 percent to give &#8220;we the people&#8221; the option of impeaching them?</p>
<p>But wow, what a joy it would be to work on such a project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/removing-a-failed-president/#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/removing-a-failed-president/#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>Sadly, even were such an amendment in place, it would not be sufficient to remove Bush and Cheney. The Republican minority has demonstrated repeatedly that it can prevent the majority from achieving 60% votes to end debate, certainly it would do the same to prevent a referendum for removal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, even were such an amendment in place, it would not be sufficient to remove Bush and Cheney. The Republican minority has demonstrated repeatedly that it can prevent the majority from achieving 60% votes to end debate, certainly it would do the same to prevent a referendum for removal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
