<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The World’s Fastest-Growing Refugee Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/05/the-world%e2%80%99s-fastest-growing-refugee-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/05/the-world%e2%80%99s-fastest-growing-refugee-crisis/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Petersen</title>
		<link>http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/05/the-world%e2%80%99s-fastest-growing-refugee-crisis/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 05:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/05/the-world%e2%80%99s-fastest-growing-refugee-crisis/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Dahr is great, but he might be more careful and accurate with his terminology -- rather than seizing upon the terminology of the imperialists. In this interview, he says, "So you can imagine that the sentiment toward the United States was already quite anti-American, long before they had to leave." In another instance, he says, "That compounded with what’s happened in their country, and there’s really nothing but broad anti-American sentiment now."

First, the term "anti-American" is used in a most biased manner. Dahr does not refer to the "anti-Arabism" of US-sponsored or direct aggression against Arabs. Second, it seems absurd to expect "pro-American" sentiments from victims of US aggression. Third, to the extent that there is ill will against US imperialism, the term "anti-American" is very broad, general, and imprecise. I submit "anti-occupation" or "anti-imperialism" are much more precise descriptions of what Arabs are feeling, as opposed to the wide-tarring "anti-American."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dahr is great, but he might be more careful and accurate with his terminology &#8212; rather than seizing upon the terminology of the imperialists. In this interview, he says, &#8220;So you can imagine that the sentiment toward the United States was already quite anti-American, long before they had to leave.&#8221; In another instance, he says, &#8220;That compounded with what’s happened in their country, and there’s really nothing but broad anti-American sentiment now.&#8221;</p>
<p>First, the term &#8220;anti-American&#8221; is used in a most biased manner. Dahr does not refer to the &#8220;anti-Arabism&#8221; of US-sponsored or direct aggression against Arabs. Second, it seems absurd to expect &#8220;pro-American&#8221; sentiments from victims of US aggression. Third, to the extent that there is ill will against US imperialism, the term &#8220;anti-American&#8221; is very broad, general, and imprecise. I submit &#8220;anti-occupation&#8221; or &#8220;anti-imperialism&#8221; are much more precise descriptions of what Arabs are feeling, as opposed to the wide-tarring &#8220;anti-American.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
